Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/188,115

LIGHTING DEVICE FOR VEHICLES

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 24, 2025
Examiner
TAYLOR, APRIL ALICIA
Art Unit
2876
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Hella GmbH & Co. KGaA
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
541 granted / 687 resolved
+10.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
708
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
36.2%
-3.8% vs TC avg
§102
33.4%
-6.6% vs TC avg
§112
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 687 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is responsive to the application filed 04/24/2025 which claims 1-15 have been presented for examination. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in Germany on 04/30/2024. It is noted, however, that applicant has not filed a certified copy of the DE 102024112051.7 application as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 04/24/2025 has been considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claims 1-15 are objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 1, substitute “the inner surface” with – an inner surface (see line 9); and “the outer surface” with – an outer surface – (see line 12). In claim 2, substitute “an exposed end thereof” with -- an exposed end of the optical waveguide -- (see line 2); “the first part thereof” with – the first part of the optical waveguide – (see line 2); and “the waveguide” with – the optical waveguide – (see line 4). In claim 3, substitute “the waveguide” with – the optical waveguide – (see line 1). In claim 4, substitute “the upstream end of the waveguide” an upstream end of the optical waveguide – (see line 2). In claim 9, substitute “the back of the cover lens” with – a back of the cover lens – (see line 3); and “it” with – the component material – (see line 4). In claim 11, substitute “the waveguide” with – the optical waveguide – (see line 2). In claim 12, substitute “the extension” with – an extension – (see line 2); and “the edges” with – edges – (see line 2). In claim 13, substitute “the main beam direction” with – a main beam direction – (see line 3); and “the at least one flat surface” with – an at least one flat surface – (see line 3). In claim 15, substitute “the surface” with – a surface – (see lines 2 and 3, respectively). Claims 5-8, 10, and 14 are objected to since they are dependent upon an objected claim. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the light source" in lines 8 and 11, respectively. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the light-directing optical element source" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 10 recites the limitation “a second light module” which renders the claim indefinite because the claim fails to establish a “first light module”. Therefore, there is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 15 recites the limitation "the diffusing optical structure" in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 2-8, 7-9, and 11-14 are rejected to since they are dependent upon rejected claim, and inherit the problems of that claim Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-8 and 11-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wasilewski et al. (US 10,473,303) (hereinafter referred to as Wasilewski). Re claim 1, Wasilewski discloses a lighting device (10) comprising: a housing (12) with an opening (see fig. 3); a cover lens (14) that covers the opening in the housing (see fig. 3); a light module (32) that contains a number of light sources and an optical unit (portions 34, 36 are configured to transmit light therethrough and can be referred to as the light guide) for generating a predefined light distribution, the optical unit containing an optical waveguide that has a light entry surface and a light emitting surface (portions 34, 36 are configured to transmit light therethrough and can be referred to as the light guide), the optical waveguide being connected to the cover lens (see fig. 3; col. 4, lines 19-66), wherein a first part (36) of the optical waveguide, facing the light module (32), protrudes from an inner surface (40) of the cover lens (14), or the light entry surface of the optical waveguide is flush with the inner surface of the cover lens (see fig. 3; and col. 4, line 62 to col. 5, line 31), and wherein a second part of the optical waveguide (34), facing away from the light module (32), protrudes from an outer surface (38) of the cover lens (14), or the light emitting surface of the optical waveguide is flush with the outer surface of the cover lens (see fig. 3; and col. 4, line 62 to col. 5, line 31). Re claim 2, Wasilewski discloses the lighting device according to claim 1, wherein the light entry surface on the optical waveguide is formed by an exposed end of the optical waveguide or the first part of the optical waveguide (see fig. 3, portion 36), and the light emitting surface of the optical waveguide is formed by an exposed end of the optical waveguide or the second part of the waveguide (see fig. 3, portion 34). Re claim 3, Wasilewski discloses the lighting device according to claim 1, wherein the optical waveguide (portions 34, 36 are configured to transmit light therethrough and can be referred to as the light guide) is integrally connected to the cover lens (14) (see fig. 3). Re claims 4 and 5, Wasilewski discloses wherein there is a light-directing optical element on an upstream end of the waveguide; and wherein the light-directing optical element lens (fig. 3 shows lens 14 having outer surface (38) on an upstream end of the first and second portions 34, 36). Re claim 6, Wasilewski discloses the lighting device according to claim 1, wherein there are numerous light sources upstream of a light-directing optical element (col. 6, lines 41-67). Re claim 7, Wasilewski discloses the lighting device according to claim 1, wherein the light emitting surface on the optical waveguide has a diffusing optical element or optical structure (col. 4, lines 19-61). Re claim 8, Wasilewski discloses the lighting device according to claim 1, wherein the cover lens and optical waveguide are produced in an injection molding process from a single transparent (col. 5, lines 11-22). Re claim 11, Wasilewski discloses the lighting device according to claim 1, wherein the optical waveguide is a flat waveguide with opposing flat surfaces where the light that enters the waveguide undergoes total internal reflection, and wherein the light entry surface and light emitting surface of the optical waveguide each form a narrow linear surface (see fig. 3; and col. 4, lines 19-58). Re claim 12, Wasilewski discloses the lighting device according to claim 1, wherein the cover lens (14) is curved in a plane at a right angle to an extension of the optical waveguide, wherein edges of the cover lens meet at an angle of 40° to 90° (see fig. 3). Re claim 13, Wasilewski discloses the lighting device according to claim 1, wherein the light emitting surface of the optical waveguide is horizontal, at an angle to, or curved in relation to a main beam direction, and an at least one flat surface of the optical waveguide bordering the light emitting surface has a diffusing optical structure (see fig. 3; and col. 4, lines 19-61). Re claim 14, Wasilewski discloses the lighting device according to claim 1, wherein an outer surface of the cover lens has a diffusing structure (see col. 4, lines 19-58). Re claim 15, Wasilewski discloses the lighting device according to claim 1, wherein a diffusing optical structure is formed by the cover lens (see col. 4, lines 19-58). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Please refer to the attached PTO-892 form. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to APRIL A TAYLOR whose telephone number is (571)272-2403. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday between 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, STEVEN S PAIK can be reached at 571-272-2404. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /APRIL A TAYLOR/Examiner, Art Unit 2876 /THIEN M LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2876
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 24, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Apr 02, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602558
AUTHENTICATION AND SECURE COMMUNICATION USING LED ARRAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592113
Dual Cassette
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585911
Optical Anti-Counterfeiting Element and Optical Anti-Counterfeiting Product
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579393
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS AND SERVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12562019
CASSETTE HOLDER FOR AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+8.1%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 687 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month