Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/188,439

Optical-Fiber Stylet Holders and Methods Thereof

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 24, 2025
Priority
Nov 18, 2020 — provisional 63/115,442 +1 more
Examiner
JOHNSON, GERALD
Art Unit
3797
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Bard Access Systems Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
531 granted / 676 resolved
+8.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
692
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§103
56.1%
+16.1% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 676 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 05/08/2025, 08/08/2025, 11/20/2025, 02/19/2026, and 06/17/2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species B (FIG. 8) to include claims 4, 5, 11, and 20 in the reply filed on 06/09/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4, 5, 11, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Osman (Pat. No.: US 11,559,646) in view of Salamini et al. (Pub. No.: US 2020/0281503). Consider claim 4, Osman discloses an optical-fiber stylet holder (col. 8, lines 22-61, Figs. 1, 2, connection hub 128), comprising: a housing including a housing through hole dimensioned to accept an optical-fiber stylet therethrough (col. 8, lines 22-61, Figs. 1, 2, a stylet port 134 dimensionally adapted for receiving a fiber optic stylet 116); an insert partially disposed in the housing and partially extending as a button from a side of the housing perpendicular to the housing through hole, the insert including an insert through hole coincident with the housing through hole (col. 8, line 62 thru col. 9, line 16, Figs. 1, 2, release lock 138 that removably extends within the stylet port 134 to selectively engage the fiber optic stylet 116); and a spring configured to push or pull the insert toward the side of the housing from which the insert extends (col. 8, line 62 thru col. 9, line 16, Figs. 1, 2, release lock 138 may comprise a spring-toggle member), the optical-fiber stylet acting as a stop to the insert being pushed or pulled toward the side of the housing when the optical-fiber stylet is inserted through both the housing through hole and the insert through hole, the optical-fiber stylet holder thereby providing a locking mechanism configured to lock the optical-fiber stylet in the optical-fiber stylet holder and prevent distal movement of the optical-fiber stylet while the optical-fiber stylet is disposed in a hollow needle (col. 8, line 62 thru col. 9, line 16, Figs. 1, 2, the release lock 138 is used to prevent the fiber optic stylet 116 from moving when the distal end 166 of the fiber optic stylet 116 is coplanar with the beveled tip of the hollow needle 132). Osman does not specifically disclose the optical-fiber stylet is disposed in a catheter. Salamini discloses the optical-fiber stylet is disposed in a catheter (paragraphs [0119], [0136], a stylet that runs through the catheter). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to replace the hollow needle as disclosed by Osman with the catheter as taught by Salamini in order that the vascular catheter may be advanced so that the distal tip of the catheter is at a known position relative to the distal tip of the stylet/guidewire (Salamini, paragraph [0136]). Consider claim 5, Osman does not specifically disclose wherein the optical-fiber stylet holder is configured to couple to a Luer connector of the catheter. Salamini discloses wherein the optical-fiber stylet holder is configured to couple to a Luer connector of the catheter (paragraph [0146], Fig. 10, locking device 1022 may be used to lock the stylet to the proximal end of the catheter using luer lock 1020 at the proximal end of catheter 1018). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to replace the optical-fiber stylet holder as disclosed by Osman with the optical-fiber stylet holder as taught by Salamini so that the stylet/guidewire won't move with respect to the vascular catheter (Salamini, paragraph [0146]). Consider claim 11, Osman discloses a method of an optical-fiber stylet holder (col. 7, lines 41-54, a method including a fiber optic port for receiving a fiber optic stylet), comprising: inserting an optical-fiber stylet into the optical-fiber stylet holder (col. 8, lines 22-61, Figs. 1, 2, a stylet port 134 dimensionally adapted for receiving a fiber optic stylet 116); advancing the optical-fiber stylet through a hollow needle (col. 8, lines 22-61, Figs. 1, 2, the fiber optic stylet 116 to passes through the inner space of the connection hub 128, and slide within the hollow needle 132); advancing a distal tip of the optical-fiber stylet through a vasculature to a target anatomical location in a patient (col. 8, line 62 thru col. 9, line 16, Figs. 1, 2, the fiber optic stylet 116 end enters a patient's anatomical regions or area such as through the skin or when entering the cricothyroid membrane, or to advance the distal end 166 of the fiber optic stylet 116 into a patient's trachea lumen); and holding the distal tip of the optical-fiber stylet in the target anatomical location without at least distal advancement of the distal tip by locking the optical-fiber stylet in the optical-fiber stylet holder (col. 8, line 62 thru col. 9, line 16, Figs. 1, 2, the release lock 138 is used to prevent the fiber optic stylet 116 from moving when the distal end 166 of the fiber optic stylet 116 is coplanar with the beveled tip of the hollow needle 132). Osman does not specifically disclose advancing the optical-fiber stylet through a catheter. Salamini discloses advancing the optical-fiber stylet through a catheter (paragraphs [0119], [0136], a stylet that runs through the catheter). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to replace the hollow needle as disclosed by Osman with the catheter as taught by Salamini in order that the vascular catheter may be advanced so that the distal tip of the catheter is at a known position relative to the distal tip of the stylet/guidewire (Salamini, paragraph [0136]). Consider claim 20, the combination of Osman and Salamini discloses comprising: pressing a button of an insert extending from a side of a housing of the optical-fiber stylet holder to pull or push a spring to allow the optical-fiber stylet to freely move through both housing and insert through holes for adjusting a position of the optical-fiber stylet holder on the optical-fiber stylet (col. 8, line 62 thru col. 9, line 16, Figs. 1, 2, release lock 138 may comprise a spring-toggle member and a push in and out contactor used so that the fiber optic stylet 116 and needle ends can simultaneously enter a patient's anatomical regions or area such as through the skin or when entering the cricothyroid membrane, or to advance the distal end 166 of the fiber optic stylet 116 into a patient's trachea lumen); and releasing the button to push or pull the insert by way of the spring toward the side of the housing from which the insert extends, thereby locking the optical-fiber stylet in the optical-fiber stylet holder as a stop in the housing and insert through holes and holding the distal tip of the optical-fiber stylet in the target anatomical location (col. 8, line 62 thru col. 9, line 16, Figs. 1, 2, release lock 138 may comprise a spring-toggle member and a push in and out contactor used to prevent the fiber optic stylet 116 from moving when the distal end 166 of the fiber optic stylet 116 is coplanar with the beveled tip of the hollow needle 132). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GERALD JOHNSON whose telephone number is (571)270-7685. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Carey Michael can be reached at (571)270-7235. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Gerald Johnson/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3797
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 24, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12733868
DEPTH DATA-BASED PRESSURE ULCER DIAGNOSIS SYSTEM AND METHOD USING MULTISPECTRAL LIGHT SOURCE
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12730475
WEARABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12731385
QUALIFICATION OF A DERMASCOPE IMAGING DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12728288
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRETREATEMENT IMAGING IN ADAPTIVE RADIATION THERAPY
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12721558
MEDICAL IMAGE ACQUISITION UNIT ASSISTANCE APPARATUS
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+9.4%)
2y 8m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 676 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month