Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 22, 2026
Application No. 19/189,493

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING COMMUNICATION SIGNAL OF PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER GENERATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §101§102§103
Filed
Apr 25, 2025
Priority
Apr 30, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0057640
Examiner
CORRIELUS, JEAN B
Art Unit
2633
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Hanwha Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
894 granted / 998 resolved
+27.6% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
1015
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
§103
34.2%
-5.8% vs TC avg
§102
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§112
30.3%
-9.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 998 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 5-6, 15 and 16 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 5, please spell out “SNR” as recited in line 3. As per claim 6, 15 and 16, see claim 5. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because claim is directed to a “computer-readable recording medium”. The broadest reasonable interpretation of “computer-readable recording medium” includes “a signal” per-se. Claims directed to “signal” per-se are non-statutory. Accordingly, claim 10 is non-statutory. The rejection maybe overcome if the claim is amended to recite “ non-transitory computer-readable recording medium”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – Claim(s) 1, 2 and 11-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Han et al US Patent Application Publication No. US20190115868 A1. As per claim 1, Han et al discloses a method and apparatus (fig. 1) for controlling a communication signal of a photovoltaic power generation system(10), the method comprising: acquiring data on a communication status by monitoring a plurality of devices (50) included in the photovoltaic power generation system (10) (note para. [0045]; deriving information related to communication of each of the devices (50) based on the acquired data (para. [0046]); and controlling a communication signal of at least one of the devices (50) based on one of the acquired data or the information related to the communication (note para. [0045]). As per claim 2, Han et al further teaches the acquiring comprises acquiring the data on the communication status by monitoring the communication status among the devices (50) connected by a power line communication method (see at least para. [0033] and para. [0040]). As per claim 11, see rejection of claim 1. In addition, Han et al teaches the apparatus comprises a memory 860 and a controller 820. As per claim 12, see claim 2. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Han et al US Patent Application Publication No. US20190115868 A1 in view of Hadar et al US 8,751,053. As per claim 10, as applied to claim 1 above Han et al discloses every feature recited in the claim but fails to explicitly teach that the invention can be implemented in a computer readable medium storing a program to execute the method. Hada et al provides a computer readable medium storing a program to execute a method see col. 8, lines 1-30. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skill in the art to incorporate a computer readable medium storing a program to execute a method in Han et al in order the enable the invention to be used using existing computer hardware to reduce implementation cost and improve consumer experience. Claim(s) 8 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Han et al US Patent Application Publication No. US20190115868 A1 in view of ( translated abstract) Zhang CN 113050495 A. As per claim 8, as applied to claim 1 above, Han et al discloses every feature recited in the claim but fails to explicitly teach providing a user with an alarm indicating a result of controlling the communication signal. Zhang et al teaches generally providing an alarm to a user based on analyzing (controlling) the communication signal(s) (Zhang et al, translated abstract). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skill in the art to have modified Han et al by providing the additional step of teach providing a user with an alarm indicating a result of controlling the communication signal so that the user can conveniently retrieve and check the results so as to improve maintenance efficiency (Zhang, translated abstract). As per claim 18, see rejection of claim 8. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-7, 9, 13-17 and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEAN B CORRIELUS whose telephone number is (571)272-3020. The examiner can normally be reached 10:00AM-3:00PM Monday-Thursday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sam K Ahn can be reached at 571-272-3044. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEAN B CORRIELUS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 25, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12771580
RECEIVER INCLUDING NEGATIVE COVARIANCE GENERATION FILTER AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12763991
Signal receiving apparatus and method having channel identifying mechanism
1y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12754237
DATA CORRECTION AND PHASE OPTIMIZATION IN HIGH-SPEED RECEIVERS
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12750264
DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744565
Precoding Matrix Feedback Method, Terminal and Network Side Device
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.5%)
2y 4m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 998 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month