Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/189,740

MOTOR VEHICLE WITH A LIGHTING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Apr 25, 2025
Examiner
TAYLOR, APRIL ALICIA
Art Unit
2876
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Audi AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
541 granted / 687 resolved
+10.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
708
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
36.2%
-3.8% vs TC avg
§102
33.4%
-6.6% vs TC avg
§112
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 687 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is responsive to the application filed 04/25/2025 which claims 1-20 have been presented for examination. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 04/25/2025 has been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the at least partially bordered application surface" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 7-13, and 17-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kuhl (US 2006/0109657). Regarding claim 1, Kuhl discloses a motor vehicle with a lighting device (10) which is arranged on the motor vehicle, and which comprises: a first flat reflection element (14) arranged in a first reflection plane of the lighting device (see figs. 2 and 9; paras. 0029, 0031), a second flat reflection element (18) arranged in a second reflection plane and spaced from the first reflection element, wherein the second reflection element is designed to reflect light and is partially transparent (see figs. 2 and 9; paras. 0029, 0034), wherein both reflection elements (14, 18) are aligned with each other such that their reflecting surfaces face each other and form an intermediate space, and wherein the first reflection element is arranged on the motor vehicle (see figs. 2 and 9; paras. 0029, 0031, 0035); wherein the lighting device (10) has at least one lighting element (16) which is arranged in the intermediate space in such a way that, when switched on, the lighting device (10) emits light onto at least one of the two reflection elements (see figs. 2 and 9; paras. 0032, 0034-0035, 0046); and wherein the lighting device (10) forms a light strip (see figs. 2 and 9; para. 0032). Regarding claim 2, Kuhl further discloses the motor vehicle according to claim 1, wherein the lighting device forms a curved light strip (see fig. 1; paras. 0030-0031). Regarding claim 3, Kuhl further discloses the motor vehicle according to claim 1, wherein a display device is arranged on an application surface adjacent to the lighting device (see paras. 0037, 0042, 0054). Regarding claim 4, Kuhl further discloses the motor vehicle according to claim 1, wherein at least one operating element is arranged on an application surface adjacent to the lighting device (see fig. 9; paras. 0042-0043, 0052-0053). Regarding claim 7, Kuhl further discloses the motor vehicle according to claim 1, wherein the first reflection element (14) is designed as mirror (paras. 0029-0030). Regarding claim 8, Kuhl further discloses the motor vehicle according to claim 1, wherein the second reflection element is designed as frosted glass or partially opaque (paras. 0034, 0037). Regarding claim 9, Kuhl further discloses the motor vehicle according to claim 1, wherein the first reflection element (14) is a surface of an interior trim element of the motor vehicle, or is a surface of the body of the motor vehicle (paras. 0030, 0037, 0054). Regarding claim 10, Kuhl further discloses the motor vehicle according to claim 1, wherein the lighting device (10) is arranged on an interior trim element of the motor vehicle or on an outer side of the body of the motor vehicle (paras. 0030, 0039-0040, 0054). Regarding claim 11, Kuhl further discloses the motor vehicle according to claim 2, wherein a display device is arranged on an application surface adjacent to the lighting device (see paras. 0037, 0042, 0054). Regarding claim 12, Kuhl further discloses the motor vehicle according to claim 2, wherein at least one operating element is arranged on an application surface adjacent to the lighting device (see fig. 9; paras. 0042-0043, 0052-0053). Regarding claim 13, Kuhl further discloses the motor vehicle according to claim 3, wherein at least one operating element is arranged on an application surface adjacent to the lighting device (see fig. 9; paras. 0042-0043, 0052-0053). Regarding claim 17, Kuhl further discloses the motor vehicle according to claim 2, wherein the first reflection element is designed as a mirror (paras. 0029-0030). Regarding claim 18, Kuhl further discloses the motor vehicle according to claim 3, wherein the first reflection element is designed as a mirror (paras. 0029-0030). Regarding claim 19, Kuhl further discloses the motor vehicle according to claim 4, wherein the first reflection element is designed as a mirror (paras. 0029-0030). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5-6, 14-16 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kuhl (US 2006/0109657) in view of Mueller et al. (WO 2007/025574 A1) (hereinafter referred to as Mueller). The teachings of Kuhl have been discussed above. Regarding claims 5 and 6, Kuhl discloses wherein the lighting device may be for any portion of a motor vehicle (paras. 0042, 0054), but fails to specifically teach wherein the lighting device is arranged on an inner side of a door of the motor vehicle. Mueller discloses a lighting device arranged on an inner side of a door of the motor vehicle, and wherein a door opening handle is arranged on an application surface of the door (see abstract; and figs. 2-3). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine the teachings of Kuhl and Mueller in order to increase the visual appeal and enhance the appearance of a vehicle (see Kuhl, paras. 0010, 0035). Regarding claims 14-16, Kuhl discloses wherein the lighting device may be for any portion of a motor vehicle (paras. 0042, 0054), but fails to specifically teach wherein the lighting device is arranged on an inner side of a door of the motor vehicle. Mueller discloses a lighting device arranged on an inner side of a door of the motor vehicle, and wherein a door opening handle is arranged on an application surface of the door (see abstract; and figs. 2-3). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to combine the teachings of Kuhl and Mueller in order to increase the visual appeal and enhance the appearance of a vehicle (see Kuhl, paras. 0010, 0035). Regarding claim 20, Kuhl as modified by Mueller further discloses the motor vehicle according to claim 5, wherein the first reflection element is designed as a mirror (see Kuhl, paras. 0029-0030). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See attached PTO-892 form. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to APRIL A TAYLOR whose telephone number is (571)272-2403. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday between 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, STEVEN S PAIK can be reached at 571-272-2404. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /APRIL A TAYLOR/Examiner, Art Unit 2876 /THIEN M LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2876
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 25, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602558
AUTHENTICATION AND SECURE COMMUNICATION USING LED ARRAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592113
Dual Cassette
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585911
Optical Anti-Counterfeiting Element and Optical Anti-Counterfeiting Product
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12579393
IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS AND SERVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12562019
CASSETTE HOLDER FOR AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+8.1%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 687 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month