CTNF 19/190,018 CTNF 72671 DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-20 are pending in the present application. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 02 October 2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has been considered by the examiner. Double Patenting 08-33 AIA The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg , 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman , 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi , 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum , 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel , 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington , 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA/25, or PTO/AIA/26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. 08-34 AIA Claim s 1, and 6-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim s 1, 3, 5-12, and 15-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12,373,443 B2 Kuang et al .. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because it is well settled that omission of elements and their functioning is an obvious expedient if the remaining elements perform the same function as before. See In re Karlson, 136 USPQ 184 (CCPA 1963) . 19/190,018 1 . A system for providing an adaptive user interface, comprising: one or more processors; and one or more computer-readable media storing instructions that are executable to cause the one or more processors to perform operations, the operations comprising: obtaining, via an initial user interface comprising an input component, user input data indicative of a request; processing the user input data to determine an intent associated with the request; obtaining, based on the intent, data indicative of one or more components from an index comprising component data associated with a plurality of components, wherein a first component of the one or more components comprises a portion of functionality associated with code that when executed causes the system to perform a processing task; determining a rank for the first component based on the intent associated with the request and the portion of functionality of the first component, wherein the first component is ranked higher than a second component based on a similarity of the first component and the intent; and modifying the initial user interface to generate an updated user interface by removing the input component and displaying the first component and one or more additional components, wherein the components are displayed based at least in part on the rank of the respective component. 6 . The system of claim 1, the operations comprising: providing for display a space comprising a plurality of components. 7 . The system of claim 6, wherein the space is automatically generated based at least in part on data associated with an individual user or aggregated data indicative of a plurality of users. 8 . The system of claim 1, wherein determining the rank for the first component is based on at least one of: (i) one or more user generated spaces, (ii) semantic processing of relationships between a plurality of components in a user generated space, (iii) the index of the component data, or (iv) prediction of a relationship between a plurality of candidate components. 9 . The system of claim 8, wherein determining the rank is performed by a machine-learned model. 10 . The system of claim 9, the operations comprising: generating an index of the one or more user generated spaces; and training the machine-learned model using the index of the one or more user generated spaces. 11 . The system of claim 8, wherein the semantic processing of relationship between a plurality of components in the user generated space comprises: obtaining data indicative of a plurality of components associated with the user generated space; and updating, based on the data indicative of the plurality of components, the index of the component data. 12 . The system of claim 11, wherein the data indicative of the plurality of components associated with the user generated space comprises at least one of: (i) data indicative of cross-functionality of the one or more components associated with the user generated space, (ii) data indicative of one or more tags associated with the respective components associated with the user generated space, or (iii) data indicative of a description of the user generated space. 13 . The system of claim 12, wherein the one or more tags comprise a label of at least one of a component type, subject matter, or associated intent. 14 . The system of claim 1, wherein processing the user input data to determine an intent associated with the request, comprises: maintaining data enclaves comprising user data, wherein the data enclaves prevent access to user data from third parties; obtaining requests from component components for access to the user data; and providing limited access to user data. 15 . The system of claim 14, wherein providing limited access to user data comprises: obtaining portions of functionality associated with the component components; determining necessary user data for performing the portions of functionality; providing access to the necessary user data to perform the portions of functionality; processing, within the data enclaves, the user data and the portions of functionality; and performing the portions of functionality using the accessed user data. 16 . The system of claim 1, wherein the portion of functionality comprises at least one of: (i) coordinating scheduling for a user, (ii) causing media to play, (iii) coordinating a user placing an order, (iv) coordinating a leg of travel for a user, (v) providing location specific information, (vi) providing a link or preview of third-party content, (vii) providing an input component, or (viii) providing means for controlling items associated with the user. 17 . The system of claim 16, wherein the user data comprises data indicative of at least one of (i) one or more user preferences, (ii) user account data, or (iii) user history. 18 . A computer-implemented method comprising: obtaining, via an initial user interface comprising an input component, user input data indicative of a request; processing the user input data to determine an intent associated with the request; obtaining, based on the intent, data indicative of one or more components from an index comprising component data associated with a plurality of components, wherein a first component of the one or more components comprises a portion of functionality associated with code that when executed causes a system to perform a processing task; determining a rank for the first component based on the intent associated with the request and the portion of functionality of the first component, wherein the first component is ranked higher than a second component based on a similarity of the first component and the intent; and modifying the initial user interface to generate an updated user interface by removing the input component and displaying the first component and one or more additional components, wherein the components are displayed based at least in part on the rank of the respective component. 19 . The method of claim 18, wherein the respective component comprises a portion of functionality, wherein the portion of functionality comprises at least one of a functionality generated by a user or a functionality generated by a developer. 20 . A non-transitory computer readable medium embodied in a computer-readable storage device and comprising instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations, the operations comprising: obtaining, via an initial user interface comprising an input component, user input data indicative of a request; processing the user input data to determine an intent associated with the request; obtaining, based on the intent, data indicative of one or more components from an index comprising component data associated with a plurality of components, wherein a first component of the one or more components comprises a portion of functionality associated with code that when executed causes a system to perform a processing task; determining a rank for the first component based on the intent associated with the request and the portion of functionality of the first component, wherein the first component is ranked higher than a second component based on a similarity of the first component and the intent; and modifying the initial user interface to generate an updated user interface by removing the input component and displaying the first component and one or more additional components, wherein the components are displayed based at least in part on the rank of the respective component. US Patent 12,373,443 B2 1. A system for providing an adaptive user interface, comprising: one or more processors; and one or more computer-readable media storing instructions that are executable to cause the one or more processors to perform operations, the operations comprising: obtaining component data associated with a plurality of components; generating an index of the component data; obtaining, via an initial user interface comprising an input component, user input data indicative of a request; processing the user input data to determine an intent associated with the request; obtaining, based on the intent, data indicative of one or more components from the index, wherein a first component of the one or more components comprises a portion of functionality associated with code that when executed causes the system to perform a processing task; determining a rank for the first component based on the intent associated with the request and the portion of functionality of the first component, wherein the first component is ranked higher than a second component based on a similarity of the first component and the intent; and modifying the initial user interface to generate an updated user interface by removing the input component and displaying the first component and one or more additional components, wherein the components are displayed based at least in part on the rank of the respective component. 5. The system of claim 1, the operations comprising: providing for display a space comprising a plurality of components. 6. The system of claim 5, wherein the space is automatically generated based at least in part on data associated with an individual user or aggregated data indicative of a plurality of users. 7. The system of claim 1, wherein determining the rank for the first component is based on at least one of: (i) one or more user generated spaces, (ii) semantic processing of relationships between a plurality of components in a user generated space, (iii) the index of the component data, or (iv) prediction of a relationship between a plurality of candidate components. 8. The system of claim 6, wherein determining the rank is performed by a machine-learned model. 9. The system of claim 8, the operations comprising: generating an index of the one or more user generated spaces; and training the machine-learned model using the index of the one or more user generated spaces. 10. The system of claim 7, wherein the semantic processing of relationship between a plurality of components in the user generated space comprises: obtaining data indicative of a plurality of components associated with the user generated space; and updating, based on the data indicative of the plurality of components, the index of the component data. 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the data indicative of the plurality of components associated with the user generated space comprises at least one of: (i) data indicative of cross-functionality of the one or more components associated with the user generated space, (ii) data indicative of one or more tags associated with the respective components associated with the user generated space, or (iii) data indicative of a description of the user generated space. 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the one or more tags comprise a label of at least one of a component type, subject matter, or associated intent. 15. The system of claim 1, wherein processing the user input data to determine an intent associated with the request, comprises: maintaining data enclaves comprising user data, wherein the data enclaves prevent access to user data from third parties; obtaining requests from component components for access to the user data; and providing limited access to user data. 16. The system of claim 15, wherein providing limited access to user data comprises: obtaining portions of functionality associated with the component components; determining necessary user data for performing the portions of functionality; providing access to the necessary user data to perform the portions of functionality; processing, within the data enclaves, the user data and the portions of functionality; and performing the portions of functionality using the accessed user data. 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the portion of functionality comprises at least one of: (i) coordinating scheduling for a user, (ii) causing media to play, (iii) coordinating a user placing an order, (iv) coordinating a leg of travel for a user, (v) providing location specific information, (vi) providing a link or preview of third-party content, (vii) providing an input component, or (viii) providing means for controlling items associated with the user. 17. The system of claim 15, wherein the user data comprises data indicative of at least one of (i) one or more user preferences, (ii) user account data, or (iii) user history. 18. A computer-implemented method comprising: obtaining component data associated with a plurality of components; generating an index of the component data; obtaining, via an initial user interface comprising an input component, user input data indicative of a request; processing the user input data to determine an intent associated with the request; obtaining, based on the intent, data indicative of one or more components from the index, wherein a first component of the one or more components comprises a portion of functionality associated with code that when executed causes a system to perform a processing task; determining a rank for the first component based on the intent associated with the request and the portion of functionality of the first component, wherein the first component is ranked higher than a second component based on a similarity of the first component and the intent; and modifying the initial user interface to generate an updated user interface by removing the input component and displaying the first component and one or more additional components are displayed based at least in part on the rank of the respective component. 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the respective component comprises a portion of functionality, wherein the portion of functionality comprises at least one of a functionality generated by a user or a functionality generated by a developer. 20. A non-transitory computer readable medium embodied in a computer-readable storage device and comprising instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations, the operations comprising: obtaining component data associated with a plurality of components; generating an index of the component data; obtaining, via an initial user interface comprising an input component, user input data indicative of a request; processing the user input data to determine an intent associated with the request; obtaining, based on the intent, data indicative of one or more components from the index, wherein a first component of the one or more components comprises a portion of functionality associated with code that when executed causes a system to perform a processing task; determining a rank for the first component based on the intent associated with the request and the portion of functionality of the first component, wherein the first component is ranked higher than a second component based on a similarity of the first component and the intent; and modifying the initial user interface to generate an updated user interface by removing the input component and displaying the first component and one or more additional components are displayed based at least in part on the rank of the respective component . Conclusion 07-96 AIA The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Note attached form PTO-892 . Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GRETA ROBINSON whose telephone number is (571)272-4118. The examiner can normally be reached Mon.-Fri. 9:30AM-6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hassan Mahmoudi can be reached at 571-272-4078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GRETA L ROBINSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 2 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 3 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 4 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 5 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 6 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 7 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 8 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 9 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 10 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 11 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 12 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 13 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 14 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 15 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 16 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 17 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 18 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 19 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 20 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 21 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 22 Art Unit: 2163 Application/Control Number: 19/190,018 Page 23 Art Unit: 2163
Prosecution Insights