Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 19/190,049

MAGNETIC MOUNT FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 25, 2025
Priority
Oct 25, 2022 — CN 202222819211.0 +1 more
Examiner
MCNICHOLS, ERET C
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Shenzhen Maigu Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
59%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
634 granted / 845 resolved
+15.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -16% lift
Without
With
+-16.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
865
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
40.1%
+0.1% vs TC avg
§102
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§112
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 845 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the inclination angle" in line 7. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Applicant should amend the claim to properly introduce this limitation. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 2 recites the limitation "the outside" in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Applicant should amend the claim to properly introduce this limitation. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 3 recites the limitation "the shape" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Applicant should amend the claim to properly introduce this limitation. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 4 recites the limitation "the center" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Applicant should amend the claim to properly introduce this limitation. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 5 recites “and the sleeve is adapted to the second connecting part. It is unclear what the sleeve is “adapted to” do. Appropriate clarification or correction is required. Claim 6 recites the limitations "the hinged end" in line 3, and “the rotation angle” in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for these limitations in the claim. Applicant should amend the claim to properly introduce these limitations. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 6 recites “a limiting part adapted to the joining part”. It is unclear what the limiting part is “adapted to” do. Appropriate clarification or correction is required. Claim 7 recites the limitations "the surface" in line 3, and “the position” in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for these limitations in the claim. Applicant should amend the claim to properly introduce these limitations. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 8 recites the limitation "the lower end" in lines 4-5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Applicant should amend the claim to properly introduce this limitation. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 9 recites the limitation "the free end" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Applicant should amend the claim to properly introduce this limitation. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 10 recites the limitations "the middle" in lines 3-4, “the upper side” in line 4, “the outer side” in line 6, “the center” in line 7 and “the inner wall” in line 8. There is insufficient antecedent basis for these limitations in the claim. Applicant should amend the claim to properly introduce these limitations. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 10 recites “the torsion spring penetrate through a through via the center”. It is unclear what “through a through” means. Appropriate clarification or correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Patent No. 10,865,934 to Kwasniewski (Kwasniewski). PNG media_image1.png 496 297 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 326 430 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 1: Kwasniewski discloses a magnetic mount for an electronic device, being characterized in that, comprising a magnetic assembly (See Annotated Fig. A), a connecting assembly (See Annotated Fig. A) and a support (See Annotated Fig. A), the magnetic assembly (See Annotated Fig. A) being configured to adsorb and connect the electronic device, the connecting assembly (See Annotated Fig. A) being configured to connect the magnetic assembly (See Annotated Fig. A) and the support (See Annotated Fig. A), the support (See Annotated Fig. A) being configured to support the electronic device, the magnetic assembly (See Annotated Fig. A) being rotatably connected (See Col. 5, line 62 – Col. 6, line 5) with the connecting assembly for adjusting the rotation angle of the electronic device, and the support being hinged (See Annotated Fig. A) with the connecting assembly for adjusting the inclination angle of the electronic device. Regarding Claim 2: Kwasniewski discloses a magnetic mount for the electronic device according to Claim 1, being characterized in that, the magnetic assembly comprises an mounting piece (See Annotated Fig. B), a magnetic piece (See Annotated Fig. B) and a cover piece (See Annotated Fig. B), wherein one side of the mounting piece is provided with a groove (See Annotated Fig. B), the magnetic piece is arranged in the groove, and the cover piece is connected with the mounting piece and covers the outside of the magnetic piece. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-10 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Reasons for Allowable Subject Matter None of the cited prior art, considered alone or in combination, discloses or teaches an annular shaped magnet positioned in an annular shaped groove; or a connecting main part, a main part, a first connecting part that extends outwards from the center of the main part, and a second connecting part that penetrates through the main part radially. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. In addition to the references used in this rejection and those cited in the PTO-892, the following references are very relevant to the claimed invention: CN 209688391, US 10721341. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERET C MCNICHOLS whose telephone number is (571)270-7363. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 9:00 - 5:00 (Eastern). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Terrell McKinnon can be reached at 571-272-4797. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ERET C. MCNICHOLS Primary Examiner Art Unit 3632 /ERET C MCNICHOLS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3632
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 25, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12731972
ADJUSTABLE SPACER FOR HOLDING SUPPLY LINES
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723387
WATER VALVE FIXATION SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722783
IN-FLIGHT ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEM KIT AND INSTALLATION METHOD THEREOF, PASSENGER SEAT AND AIRCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722944
PERSONAL SAFETY AND FALL PROTECTION SYSTEMS
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12710089
VIBRATION ABSORPTION DEVICE FOR A HEAD-UP DISPLAY DRIVING MODULE
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
59%
With Interview (-16.0%)
2y 1m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 845 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month