Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/190,811

TOUCH SENSING STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 28, 2025
Examiner
LIN, HANG
Art Unit
2626
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
E Ink Holdings Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allow Rate
295 granted / 455 resolved
+2.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
467
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
58.5%
+18.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
§112
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 455 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Status of Application Claims 1-21 are pending in the instant application. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-4 and 15-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ma et al. (US 20240419284 A1), further in in view of Zhu et al. (US 20240086019 A1). Regarding claim 1, Ma teaches a touch sensing structure, (Para 47, 59, 66. Touch sensing structure 1 of Figs 3-4 placed on display.) comprising: a display panel; (Para 66) a first sensing unit disposed on a first side or a second side of the display panel; (para 59-60. First sensing unit is top electrode 20 of Figs. 3-4) a second sensing unit disposed on the second side of the display panel; (para 59-60. First sensing unit is electrode 10 of Figs. 3-4 right below the top electrode 20) and a third sensing unit disposed on the second side of the display panel; (para 59-60. Third sensing unit is electrode 211 OF Fig 4) wherein in response to the first sensing unit being disposed on the second side of the display panel, the first sensing unit and the second sensing unit belong to a same layer; (Para 56. First sensing 10 and second sensing unit 20 are on the same layer) wherein each of the first sensing unit and second sensing unit is composed of a plurality of first metal grid units; (Para 56, 64, 70. Metal grid unit in rhombus shape as shown figures 7-9) wherein each of the first metal grid units is shaped as a rhombus (Para 56, 64, 70. Metal grid unit in rhombus shape as shown figures 7-9) However Ma does not teach and an acute angle of the rhombus is less than 90 degrees. However Zhu teaches an acute angle of the rhombus is less than 90 degrees. (Para 44-45. Fig. 3 shows an acute angle of the rhombus is less than 90 degrees) Therefore it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill, before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify Ma with Zhu to teach an acute angle of the rhombus is less than 90 degrees to produce the predictable result touch detection with electrode comprised of rhombus angle of less than 90 as taught by Zhu. Regarding claim 2, Ma and Zhu already teach the touch sensing structure of claim 1, And Ma further teaches wherein the acute angle of the rhombus is oriented toward or away from a propagation direction of light emitted by the display panel. (Para 47. 70. The touch panel is on the display panel, therefore the acute angle of the rhombus is oriented toward or away from a propagation direction of light emitted by the display panel) Regarding claim 3, Ma and Zhu already teach the touch sensing structure of claim 1, And Ma further teaches wherein an orthographic projection of the first sensing unit on the display panel is not overlapped with an orthographic projection of the second sensing unit on the display panel. (Para 56, 59-60. The first and second sensing unit 10 and 20 do not overlap as shown in figs 3-4, which means projection of the first sensing unit on the display panel is not overlapped with an orthographic projection of the second sensing unit on the display panel) Regarding claim 4, Ma and Zhu already teach the touch sensing structure of claim 1, And Ma further teaches wherein the first sensing unit is a comb-shaped electrode, the second sensing unit is composed of a plurality of first strip-shaped electrodes, and one of the first strip-shaped electrodes is disposed between adjacent two of a plurality of teeth of the comb-shaped electrode. (Figs. 3-4 shows the comb shape electrode 20, and the strip shape part of 20 is between adjacent two of a plurality of teeth of the comb-shaped electrode) Regarding claim 15, Ma and Zhu already teach the touch sensing structure of claim 1, And Ma further teaches wherein the third sensing unit is composed of a plurality of second metal grid units, and each of the second metal grid units is shaped as a rhombus. (Para 56, 64, 70. Metal grid unit in rhombus shape as shown figures 7-9) Regarding claim 16, Ma and Zhu already teach the touch sensing structure of claim 15, And Ma further teaches wherein an orthographic projection of the first metal grid units on the display panel is perpendicular to an orthographic projection of the second metal grid units on the display panel. (Para 59-60. First sensing unit 20 with projection to the light projection direction of the display and third sensing unit with projection to the side of the display direction, therefore an orthographic projection of the first metal grid units on the display panel is perpendicular to an orthographic projection of the second metal grid units on the display panel) Claim 19 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ma et al. (US 20240419284 A1), in in view of Zhu et al. (US 20240086019 A1), further in view of Kim et al. (US 20200159362 A1). Regarding claim 19, Ma and Zhu already teach the touch sensing structure of claim 1, And Ma further teaches the second sensing unit and the third sensing unit are insulated from each other. (Para 47) However Ma and Zhu do not teach further comprising: a transparent substrate located between the second sensing unit and the third sensing unit. However Kim teaches insulation between electrodes are transparent. (Para 57-59, Fig. 3A. insulation IP. silicon dioxide is transparent) Therefore it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill, before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify Ma and Zhu to teach a transparent substrate located between the second sensing unit and the third sensing unit in order to produce the predictable result of stylus touch detection by ensuring that the electrodes are properly insulated. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-14, 17-18 and 20-21 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HANG LIN whose telephone number is (571)270-7596. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Temesghen Ghebretinsae can be reached at 571-272-3017. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HANG LIN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2626
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 28, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12579932
DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD AND DEVICE FOR A DISPLAY PANEL, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12562131
DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12547261
Rotary Control Input Device for a Capacitive Touch Screen
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12548504
DRIVING CIRCUIT, DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12525160
ELECTROLUMINESCENT DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (+0.3%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 455 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month