Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/191,212

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETECTING A DISCONNECTION STATE OF A PIPE FORMING PART OF A PUMPING SYSTEM OF A FUEL COLLECTOR OF AN AIRCRAFT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 28, 2025
Priority
Apr 30, 2024 — FR FR2404525
Examiner
MORTELL, JOHN F
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Airbus SAS
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
573 granted / 855 resolved
+7.0% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
875
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
61.1%
+21.1% vs TC avg
§102
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
§112
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 855 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
CTNF 19/191,212 CTNF 84526 DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. Status of the Application 2. Pursuant to the application filed April 28, 2025, claims 1-9 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 3. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. 07-34-01 4. Claims 1 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In particular, the terms, “normal” and “abnormal” in claims 1 and 9 are relative terms which render the claims indefinite. The terms, “normal” and “abnormal” are not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Clams 2-8 are rejected for the same reasons as claim 1 because claims 2-8 depend from claim 1. 07-34-01 Claims 2 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In particular, the terms, “normal” and “abnormal” in claims 2 and 3 are relative terms which render the claims indefinite. The terms, “normal” and “abnormal” are not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Claim 4 is rejected for the same reasons as claim 3 because claim 4 depends from claim 3. Allowable Subject Matter 5. Claims 1 and 9 are objected to as being rejected under section 112 but would be allowable if amended to avoid the Section 112 rejection without materially changing the scope of the claims. Claims 2-8 are objected to for the same reasons as claims 1 and 9 because claims 2-8 depend from claim 9. Conclusion 6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN F MORTELL whose telephone number is (571)270-1873. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 10-7 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Davetta Goins can be reached at 571-272-2957. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN F MORTELL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2689 Application/Control Number: 19/191,212 Page 2 Art Unit: 2689 Application/Control Number: 19/191,212 Page 3 Art Unit: 2689
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 28, 2025
Application Filed
May 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Aug 10, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 10, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 11, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745068
Electronic Monitoring System Including Low Energy Button for Remote Activation and Control of Devices
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738137
Display Device, Display Method, And Display Program
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734290
DIABETES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
1y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738141
Fall Monitor System
1y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12730988
READER
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+25.8%)
2y 6m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 855 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month