Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 19/191,703

LIGHTING FIXTURE AND LIGHTING SYSTEM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 28, 2025
Priority
May 15, 2024 — JP 2024-079575
Examiner
LUONG, HENRY T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
508 granted / 670 resolved
+15.8% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
685
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
66.6%
+26.6% vs TC avg
§102
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 670 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Remarks This Office Action is in response to the application filed on 04/28/25. Examiner acknowledged that claims 1-6 are pending. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 04/28/25 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang (US 2007/0146126). Regarding Claim 1, Wang teaches a lighting fixture (Fig. 1; LA) that is one of a plurality of lighting fixtures (Fig. 1: LA, LB) each of which emits light in a different one of a plurality of areas (Fig. 1: A, B) included in a space, the lighting fixture comprising: a light source ([0016] “Each of these light sources may include one or more light units”); a communicator (Fig. 1: LC) that receives (i) a first detection signal (Fig. 1: SD1) indicating that a person (Fig. 1: person wearing D1) is detected in a target area (Fig. 1: A) that is a target to be illuminated by the light of the lighting fixture and(ii) a second detection signal (Fig. 1: SD2), among a plurality of second detection signals (Fig. 1: SD2, SD3), indicating that a person is detected in an area (Fig. 1: B) other than the target area among the plurality of areas; and a controller (Fig. 1: C) Wang does not explicitly teach in Fig. 1 a controller that (a) controls the light source in a first dimming state when the first detection signal is received, and (b) maintains the first dimming state when, in a case where all of the plurality of lighting fixtures are in the first dimming state, a second detection signal, among the plurality of second detection signals, indicating that a person is detected in a first area other than the target area is received, and, during a most recent predetermined period, a second detection signal, among the plurality of second detection signals, indicating that a person is detected in a second area other than the first area is received. However, [0027] teaches “when the person with the detector enters the respective area, thereby causing the light source in the area to transmit the modulated light with the respective local-area identifier. (ii) When a person with a detector leaves a first local area (and the detector no longer transmits the locator signal for that area) the lighting system controller C could command one or more lighting control units in adjacent local areas to illuminate those areas”. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Wang in order to control the light in a dimming state when a person is detected since it’s necessary to provide lighting for safety reasons when occupancy is detected. Regarding Claim 6, Wang teaches the lighting system comprising: a plurality of lighting fixtures (Fig. 1: LA, LB) each of which is the lighting fixture according to claim 1; and a plurality of sensors (Fig. 1: LCs) that each detect whether a person is present (Fig. 1: D1-3 tags worn by person). Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang as applied to claim 1 in view of Chipalkatti (CA 2515263). Regarding Claim 4, Wang teaches the lighting fixture according to claim 1 except the first area includes a plurality of areas. Chipalkatti is in the field of lighting (abstract) and teaches the first area includes a plurality of areas (Fig. 1: A-F). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling of the claimed invention to modify the device of Wang with Chipalkatti with a plurality of area in order to control the lights as a person walks through the area of the light fixture since the light can be dimmed according to the location of the person. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-3 and 5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HENRY T LUONG whose telephone number is (571)270-7008. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday: 8:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alexander Taningco can be reached at (571) 272-8048. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Henry Luong/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 28, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 06, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 28, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12731768
PLASMA PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12733081
DISTRIBUTED LIGHTING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND COLOR CORRECTION
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727073
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ACCELERATING ELECTRONS USING LASER-PLASMA INTERACTION
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719168
MULTIPLE-BAND CIRCULAR PARASITIC ARRAY ASSEMBLY HAVING MULTIPLE CIRCULAR PARASITIC ARRAYS
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12719167
DUAL BAND PRINTED F-ANTENNA USING A TRAP WITH SMALL BAND SEPARATION
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+18.0%)
2y 5m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 670 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month