Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/193,899

DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 29, 2025
Priority
Dec 16, 2024 — CN 202411854235.7
Examiner
YODICHKAS, ANEETA
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Xiamen Tianma Display Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
514 granted / 715 resolved
+9.9% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
725
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
§103
44.2%
+4.2% vs TC avg
§102
36.8%
-3.2% vs TC avg
§112
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 715 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 3-12 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected Species B, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 4/30/2026. Applicant's election with traverse of Species A drawn to claims 1, 2 and 13-16 in the reply filed on 4/30/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the various species/subspecies/sub-subspecies set forth in the Requirement are not patentably distinct and share common technical features such that a single search and examination would be appropriate. This is not found persuasive because each Species disclose different schematic top views of display panels. Species A includes pixel groups and a multiplexer, whereas Species B does not. These distinctions cause a search and examination burden. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 13 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2019/0123066 A1 to Zhan et al. As to claim 1, Zhan discloses a display panel, comprising: a first trace area (Fig. 2, paragraph 0043, where wiring area (2023) is the trace area); a first display area at least half-surrounding the first trace area (Fig. 2, paragraph 0043, display area (203)); connection data lines, wherein one of the connection data lines comprises a first portion and a second portion electrically connected to each other, the first portion located in the first trace area, and the second portion located in the first display area (Fig. 2, paragraphs 0045-0053, where data lines (1-18) include first and second portions located in trace area (2023) and display area (203)); and pixel column groups located in the first display area, wherein one of the pixel column groups comprises at least two pixel columns, and one of the pixel columns is electrically connected to two connection data lines (Fig. 2, paragraph 0046, where sub-pixels (209) are in display area (203)); wherein the pixel column groups comprise adjacent first pixel column group and second pixel column group, and the connection data lines comprise first connection data lines corresponding to the first pixel column group and second connection data lines corresponding to the second pixel column group (Fig. 2, paragraphs 0045-0046, where first data lines (205) and second data lines (208) connect to sub-pixels (209)), wherein the first portions of the first connection data lines and the first portions of the second connection data lines are located in different layers (Fig. 5 and 6, paragraph 0065, where first and second data lead lines (51, 52) are on different layers). As to claim 2, Zhan discloses the display panel, wherein in a thickness direction of the display panel, the first portions of the first connection data lines and the first portions of the second connection data lines overlap each other (Fig. 5 and 6, paragraph 0065, where first and second lead lines (51, 52) overlap each other). As to claim 13, Zhan discloses the display panel, wherein the second portions of the connection data lines are located in a same layer (Fig. 5 and 6, paragraph 0065, where second lead lines (52) are in the same layer). As to claim 16, Zhan discloses limitations similar to claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 14 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2019/0123066 A1 to Zhan et al. in view of U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2014/0092076 A1 to Lee. As to claim 14, Zhan discloses the display panel, further comprisinga non-display area located at least on one side of the first display area (Fig. 2, paragraph 0043, non-display area (202)). Zhan is deficient in disclosing a multiplexer located in the non-display area, wherein one end of one of the second portions is electrically connected to the multiplexer. However, Lee discloses the non-display area, wherein one end of one of the second portions is electrically connected to the multiplexer (Fig. 2, paragraph 0029, where data lines (DL) are connected to MUX (140) in a non-display area). At the time of filing, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to have modified then display panel as taught by Zhan by including a multiplexer connected to the display panel in a non-display area as taught by Lee. The suggestion/motivation would have been in order to reduce the number of integrated chips provided by allowing a compensation circuit built in the data driver (Lee, Abstract). As to claim 15, Zhan is deficient in disclosing the display panel, wherein the multiplexer is a 1:n multiplexer, where n≥4. However, Lee discloses the display panel, wherein the multiplexer is a 1:n multiplexer, where n≥4 (Fig. 2, paragraph 0036, where MUX (140) is a 1:N multiplexer, where N is a natural number). In addition, the same motivation is used as claim 14. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANEETA YODICHKAS whose telephone number is (571)272-9773. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ke Xiao can be reached at 571-272-7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ANEETA YODICHKAS Primary Examiner Art Unit 2627 /ANEETA YODICHKAS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 29, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765134
TRANSPARENT DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12755704
DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12748501
Keypad Controller Device
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12731534
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730327
DATA PROCESSING METHOD, SYSTEM, AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND PROGRAM PRODUCT
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+25.0%)
2y 7m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 715 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month