Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/194,293

IMAGE GENERATION BASED ON TRACKED 3D SCANNING

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Apr 30, 2025
Priority
Jun 01, 2022 — provisional 63/347,637 +1 more
Examiner
RICHER, AARON M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Shopify Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
Est. Remaining
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allowance Rate
252 granted / 481 resolved
-7.6% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
506
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
§103
54.9%
+14.9% vs TC avg
§102
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
§112
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 481 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-10 and 12-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12,361,636. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the application claims are broader in every way than the patent claims. Claim 1 of the application corresponds to claim 1 of the patent as follows: Application Patent An imaging system comprising: a processing unit configured to execute instructions to cause the system to: capture a three-dimensional (3D) scan of a 3D object by An imaging system comprising: a processing unit configured to execute instructions to cause the system to: capture a three-dimensional (3D) scan of a 3D object obtaining 3D data points corresponding to a particular perspective of the 3D object, the obtained 3D data points including a number of new 3D data points that are non-overlapping with 3D data points previously obtained and stored in a set of 3D scanning data obtaining 3D data points corresponding to a particular perspective of the 3D object… the new 3D data points being obtained 3D data points that are non-overlapping with 3D data points already stored in a set of 3D scanning data responsive to determining that the number of new 3D data points exceeds a predetermined threshold, automatically capturing a two-dimensional (2D) image corresponding to the particular perspective of the 3D object responsive to determining that the number of new 3D data points exceeds a predetermined threshold, automatically capturing a 2D image corresponding to the particular perspective of the 3D object storing the new 3D data points corresponding to the particular perspective of the 3D object in the set of 3D scanning data and storing the 2D image in association with the stored new 3D data points storing the new 3D data points corresponding to the particular perspective of the 3D object in the set of 3D scanning data and storing the 2D image in association with the stored new 3D data points The application claims correspond to the patent claims as follows: App 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Pat 1 2 3 4 8 18 5 6 7 16 19 9 10 3 12 17 13 14 15 20 Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AARON M RICHER whose telephone number is (571)272-7790. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, King Poon can be reached at (571)272-7440. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AARON M RICHER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2617
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 30, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749146
GENERATING IMAGE BLENDING WEIGHTS
4y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743852
Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Sedimentary Rocks based on a Grain to Grain Parametric Cohesive Contact Model
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12718460
GENERATION OF CURATED TRAINING DATA FOR DIFFUSION MODELS
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12705817
High Accuracy Texture Filtering in Computer Graphics
7y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12705695
METHOD TO SELECT RESOLUTION VALUES
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+20.7%)
3y 9m (~2y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 481 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month