Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 19/197,244

WRITING DEVICE, DISPLAY DEVICE, AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
May 02, 2025
Priority
May 08, 2024 — JP 2024-075882 +1 more
Examiner
PHAM, LONG D
Art Unit
2623
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Ricoh Company, Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
651 granted / 844 resolved
+15.1% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
867
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
60.9%
+20.9% vs TC avg
§102
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 844 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The amendment of claim 1 filed on May 12, 2026 has been entered and considered by examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2, 6, 11 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujitsuka et al (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2003/0122795; already of record) in view of Fukushima et al (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2011/0241703). Regarding claim 1, Fujitsuka discloses a writing device (10), (fig. 1, [0093]), comprising: a movable portion (101 and 102) having a contact portion (101), the movable portion being configured to be movable in advancing and retracting directions (i.e. the rodlike lead 101 is disposed at the leading end of the casing 11 so as to move into and out of the casing 11, and the ferrite chip 102 is fixed to the base end of the lead 101) so as to be retracted when the contact portion comes into contact with a contact target portion (i.e. when lead 101 press against the tablet 20), (figs. 1-2, [0094 and 0102]); a holding portion (11) configured to hold the movable portion (i.e. casing 11 holds lead 101 and ferrite chip 102 as well as all other components inside), (fig. 1, [0096]); and an elastic portion (103) provided on a side opposite from a contact portion side of the movable portion in the advancing and retracting directions (i.e. O-ring 103 is above the contact portion side of the lead 101 in the directions which the lead 101 moves into and out of the casing), (fig. 1, [0098 and 0094]), wherein the elastic portion (103) includes a first elastic body (left O-ring 103) and a second elastic body (right O-ring 103), the first elastic body and the second elastic body each being elastically deformed by retraction of the movable portion (i.e. elastically deforms when pressing force is applied) to reduce a thickness in the advancing and retracting directions (i.e. the O-ring 103 holds the ferrite chip 102 and the ferrite core 104 with an interval therebetween, and elastically O-rings 103 deform when pressing force is applied in a direction to move the ferrite chip 102 and the ferrite core 104 closer together, hence the thickness of both O-ring 103 has to reduce in order for the ferrite chip 102 is moved closer to the ferrite core 104), (figs. 1 and 7B, [0099-0103]), wherein the first elastic body (left O-ring 103) and the second elastic body (right O-ring 103) are provided adjacent to each other in this order with respect to the movable portion (i.e. both the left and the right O-ring 103 are adjacent and in the order with respect to the lead 101 and ferrite chip 102), (fig. 1, [0094 and 0098]). However, Fujitsuka does not mention wherein the first elastic body and the second elastic body are provided adjacent to each other in this order in the advancing and retracting directions with respect to the movable portion. In a similar field of endeavor, Fukushima teaches wherein the first elastic body (3) and the second elastic body (5) are provided adjacent to each other in this order in the advancing and retracting directions (upward/downward direction) with respect to the movable portion (72) (i.e. elements 3 and 5 are bent in fig. 5b and is thus elastic), (figs. 5a-5b, [0086-0088]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Fujitsuka, by specifically providing the first elastic body and the second elastic body are provided adjacent to each other, as taught by Fukushima, for the purpose of having information be more precisely inputted, [0033]. Regarding claim 2, Fukushima discloses wherein the first elastic body (3) has a thickness in the advancing and retracting directions smaller than a thickness of the second elastic body (5), (fig. 5a, [0086-0087]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Fujitsuka, by specifically providing the first elastic body and the second elastic body having different thickness, as taught by Fukushima, for the purpose of having information be more precisely inputted, [0033]. Regarding claim 6, Fujitsuka discloses further comprising: a pressing portion (102a) configured to be pressed by the movable portion (101 and 102) moving in a retracting direction (i.e. when lead 101 moves into the casing 11) of the advancing and retracting directions (i.e. into and out directions), wherein a signal is output by pressing of the pressing portion (i.e. with the movement of the ferrite chip 102 closer to the ferrite core 104, the inductance of the coil 105 wound on the ferrite core 104 is changed. That is, the inductance of the coil 105 is changed when the input pen 10 is operated), (fig. 1, [0103-0104]). Regarding claim 11, Fujitsuka discloses a writing device (10), (fig. 1, [0093]), comprising: a movable portion (101 and 102) having a contact portion (101), the movable portion being configured to be movable in advancing and retracting directions (i.e. the rodlike lead 101 is disposed at the leading end of the casing 11 so as to move into and out of the casing 11, and the ferrite chip 102 is fixed to the base end of the lead 101) so as to be retracted when the contact portion comes into contact with a contact target portion (i.e. when lead 101 press against the tablet 20), (figs. 1-2, [0094 and 0102]); a holding portion (11) configured to hold the movable portion (i.e. casing 11 holds lead 101 and ferrite chip 102 as well as all other components inside), (fig. 1, [0096]); and an elastic portion (103) provided on a side opposite from a contact portion side of the movable portion in the advancing and retracting directions (i.e. O-ring 103 is above the contact portion side of the lead 101 in the directions which the lead 101 moves into and out of the casing), (fig. 1, [0098 and 0094]), wherein the elastic portion (103) includes a first elastic body (left O-ring 103) and a second elastic body (right O-ring 103), the first elastic body and the second elastic body each being elastically deformed by retraction of the movable portion (i.e. elastically deforms when pressing force is applied) to reduce a thickness in the advancing and retracting directions (i.e. the O-ring 103 holds the ferrite chip 102 and the ferrite core 104 with an interval therebetween, and elastically O-rings 103 deform when pressing force is applied in a direction to move the ferrite chip 102 and the ferrite core 104 closer together, hence the thickness of both O-ring 103 has to reduce in order for the ferrite chip 102 is moved closer to the ferrite core 104), (figs. 1 and 7B, [0099-0103]), wherein the first elastic body (left O-ring 103) and the second elastic body (right O-ring 103) are provided adjacent to each other in this order with respect to the movable portion (i.e. both the left and the right O-ring 103 are adjacent and in the order with respect to the lead 101 and ferrite chip 102), (fig. 1, [0094 and 0098]). However, Fujitsuka does not mention wherein the first elastic body has a thickness in the advancing and retracting directions smaller than a thickness of the second elastic body. In a similar field of endeavor, Fukushima teaches wherein the first elastic body (3) has a thickness in the advancing and retracting directions smaller than a thickness of the second elastic body (5), (fig. 5a, [0086-0087]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Fujitsuka, by specifically providing the first elastic body and the second elastic body having different thickness, as taught by Fukushima, for the purpose of having information be more precisely inputted, [0033]. Regarding claim 18, Fukushima discloses wherein the first elastic body (3) and the second elastic body (5) are directly connected to each other, (fig. 5a, [0086-0087]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Fujitsuka, by specifically providing the first elastic body and the second elastic body directly connected to each other, as taught by Fukushima, for the purpose of having information be more precisely inputted, [0033]. Claim(s) 7-9 and 15-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujitsuka in view of Fukushima and in view of Tone (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2017/0344168; already of record). Regarding claim 7, Fujitsuka in view of Fukushima discloses everything as specified above in claim 1. However, Fujitsuka in view of Fukushima does not mention a display device. In a similar field of endeavor, Tone teaches a display device (300a) comprising: the writing device (100) according to claim 1; and a display portion (300a) as the contact target portion, wherein the display portion detects a contact position (coordinate data) of the contact portion (i.e. tip of the pen 100) with respect to the display portion, and performs a predetermined display (i.e. performing touch operation and a drawing operation), (fig. 1, [0052-0055 and 0117]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Fujitsuka in view of Fukushima, by specifically providing the display device, as taught by Tone, for the purpose of increasing functionality for using the pen with a touch panel display device. Regarding claim 8, Fujitsuka in view of Fukushima discloses everything as specified above in claim 1. However, Fujitsuka in view of Fukushima does not mention a communication system. In a similar field of endeavor, Tone teaches a communication system (fig. 25) comprising: one display device (300) each including the writing device (100), (fig. 25, [0055]), according to claim 1, and a display portion as the contact target portion (i.e. touch panel display device 300a is the contact target portion for the pen 100), (fig. 25, [0055]); a plurality of terminals (300a and 300b) configured to perform a predetermined display (i.e. object data on the touch panel display device 300a), (fig. 25, [0159]); and a server (400), (fig. 25, [0152]), wherein the display device (300), the plurality of terminals (300a and 300b), and the server (400) are communicably connected to each other, (fig. 25, [0160 and 0165]), wherein the display device detects a contact position (coordinate data) of the contact portion (i.e. tip of pen 100) with respect to the display portion, and performs a predetermined display (i.e. performing touch operation and a drawing operation), (fig. 25, [0052-0055 and 0117]), and wherein the terminals (300a and 300b) display a content of writing on the display portion of the display device by the writing device (i.e. performing touch operation and a drawing operation on the display device 300a and 300b), (figs. 7 and 10, [0090 and 0095]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Fujitsuka in view of Fukushima, by specifically providing the communication system, as taught by Tone, for the purpose of increasing functionality for using the pen with a plurality of touch panel display device. Regarding claim 9, Tone discloses wherein each of the terminals (300a and 300b) displays a content of writing on a corresponding one of the terminals (300) by the writing device (100), (i.e. user draws with the pen 100), (fig. 7, [0090]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Fujitsuka in view of Fukushima, by specifically providing the terminals, as taught by Tone, for the purpose of increasing functionality for using the pen with a plurality of touch panel display device. Regarding claim 15, please refer to claim 7 for details. Regarding claim 16, please refer to claim 8 for details. Regarding claim 17, please refer to claim 9 for details. Claim(s) 10 and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fujitsuka in view of Fukushima and in view of Ballan et al (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2016/0239112; already of record). Regarding claim 10, Fujitsuka in view of Fukushima discloses everything as specified above in claim 1. However, Fujitsuka in view of Fukushima does not mention wherein the first elastic body is an elastic body having stiffness lower than stiffness of the second elastic body. In a similar field of endeavor, Ballan teaches wherein the first elastic body (21.11) is an elastic body having a stiffness lower than stiffness of the second elastic body (21.12), (i.e. the first elastic leaf portion 21.11 has a first stiffness and the second elastic leaf portion 21.12 has a second stiffness and the first stiffness is smaller than the second stiffness), (fig. 13b, [0064]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skills in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Fujitsuka in view of Fukushima, by specifically providing the elastic bodies having different stiffness, as taught by Ballan, for the purpose of providing a thinner pen-shaped coordinate pointing device, [0026]. Regarding claim 12, please refer to claim 10 for details. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-4 and 13-14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 5 is allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. In view of amendment, the reference of Fukushima has been added for new grounds of rejection. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Inquiries Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LONG D PHAM whose telephone number is (571)270-5573. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 9am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chanh D Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-7772. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LONG D PHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2623
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 02, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 02, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 22, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 22, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 12, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700374
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700375
Source Drive Chip and Display Apparatus
1y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12687937
ADJUSTMENT SYSTEM FOR HINGED MOUSE WRIST RESTS
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12688812
LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE, IMAGE FORMING DEVICE, DISPLAY DEVICE, IMAGE CAPTURING DEVICE, ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, ILLUMINATION DEVICE, MOVING BODY, AND WEARABLE DEVICE
1y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12682833
PIXEL UNIT AND DISPLAY MODULE
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+15.7%)
2y 7m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 844 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month