Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/198,250

FLEXIBLE DISPLAY ASSEMBLY, FLEXIBLE DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PREPARING FLEXIBLE DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 05, 2025
Priority
Oct 26, 2020 — CN 202011154742.1 +2 more
Examiner
MORRISON, RASHEN E
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
530 granted / 622 resolved
+25.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
648
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
48.6%
+8.6% vs TC avg
§102
38.5%
-1.5% vs TC avg
§112
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 622 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2, 4 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang 2021/0080794 in view of Shin 11,798,928. Regarding claim 1, A flexible display assembly (100, Figs 1A-1B) comprising: a support member (108, Fig 1B); a flexible display panel (106, Fig 1B) on a side of the support member (on lower side thereof, Fig 1B), a first end of the support member protruding out of the flexible display panel (end of 108 protruding out to the left, Fig 1B); a cover layer group (layers encompassed by T1, Fig 1B) on a side (lower side, Fig 1B), away from the support member (away from 108, Fig 1B), of the flexible display panel (Fig 1B), the width of the flexible display panel being less than a width of the cover layer group (see Fig 1B), a first end of the cover layer group protruding out of the flexible display panel (end protruding out to left, Fig 1B), the cover layer group, the flexible display panel and the first end of the support member forming a structure (formed at T2, Fig 1B) with two protruding sides (at T1 and T2, Fig 1B) and a depressed middle (formed between 112 and 106, Fig 1B); and a bonding portion (112, Fig 1B) bonded between the first end of the support member and the first end of the cover layer group (see Fig 1B); wherein the cover layer group comprises: a cover layer (104, Fig 1B), a first end of the cover layer (end of 104 that contacts 108, Fig 1B) protruding out of the flexible display panel (Fig 1B) and being bonded to the bonding portion (see Fig 1B). Wang discloses the claimed invention except for expressly teaching a width of the flexible display panel being less than a width of the support member, the width of the flexible display panel being less than a width of the cover layer. Shin however teaches a similar assembly (Title) wherein a width of a flexible display panel (width of 110, Fig 9) being less than a width of a support member (width of 101a or 145, Fig 9), the width of the flexible display panel being less than a width of a cover layer (width of cover layer 164, Fig 9). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the width of the flexible display of Wang to be less than the support member and cover layer, as taught by Shin, in order to have option to make the display slightly smaller which creates a tolerance gap that ensures even if the support member or the cover layer is on the lower bound of its size tolerance and the display is on the upper bound, the display will still fit seamlessly during assembly, thereby improving reliability and optimal fitment. Regarding claim 2, Wang in view of Shin disclose the flexible display assembly according to claim 1, Wang teaches wherein a gap is provided between the bonding portion and the flexible display panel (see gap adjacent 106, Fig 1B). Regarding claim 4, Wang in view of Shin disclose the flexible display assembly according to claim 1, Wang teaches the assembly further comprising: an Optically Clear Adhesive (OCA) layer (adhesive 112, Fig 1B) between the cover layer group and the flexible display panel (Fig 1B). Regarding claim 18, Wang discloses a flexible display device (Figs 1A-3), comprising: a flexible display assembly (100, Fig 1B) comprising: a support member (108, Fig 1B); a flexible display panel (106, Fig 1B) on a side of the support member (on lower side thereof, Fig 1B), a first end of the support member protruding out of the flexible display panel (end of 108 protruding out to the left, Fig 1B); a cover layer group (layers encompassed by T1, Fig 1B) on a side (lower side, Fig 1B), away from the support member (away from 108, Fig 1B), of the flexible display panel (Fig 1B), the width of the flexible display panel being less than a width of the cover layer group (see Fig 1B), a first end of the cover layer group protruding out of the flexible display panel (end protruding out to left, Fig 1B), the cover layer group, the flexible display panel and the first end of the support member forming a structure (formed at T2, Fig 1B) with two protruding sides (at T1 and T2, Fig 1B) and a depressed middle (formed between 112 and 106, Fig 1B); and a bonding portion (112, Fig 1B) bonded between the first end of the support member and the first end of the cover layer group (see Fig 1B); wherein the cover layer group comprises: a cover layer (104, Fig 1B), a first end of the cover layer (end of 104 that contacts 108, Fig 1B) protruding out of the flexible display panel and being bonded to the bonding portion (see Fig 1B); and a reel (102, Fig 1A) connected to a side of the first end (Fig 1B), away from the flexible display panel (Fig 1B), of the support member (Fig 1B). Wang discloses the claimed invention except for expressly teaching a width of the flexible display panel being less than a width of the support member, the width of the flexible display panel being less than a width of the cover layer. Shin however teaches a similar assembly (Title) wherein a width of a flexible display panel (width of 110, Fig 9) being less than a width of a support member (width of 101a or 145, Fig 9), the width of the flexible display panel being less than a width of a cover layer (width of cover layer 164, Fig 9). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the width of the flexible display of Wang to be less than the support member and cover layer, as taught by Shin, in order to have option to make the display slightly smaller which creates a tolerance gap that ensures even if the support member or the cover layer is on the lower bound of its size tolerance and the display is on the upper bound, the display will still fit seamlessly during assembly, thereby improving reliability and optimal fitment. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3, 5-6, 8 and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 3. The flexible display assembly according to claim 2, wherein a width of the gap is greater than or equal to 0.1 mm and less than or equal to 2 mm. Claim 5. The flexible display assembly according to claim 4, wherein an elastic modulus of the bonding portion is greater than or equal to 90% of an elastic modulus of the OCA layer, and is less than or equal to 110% of the elastic modulus of the OCA layer. Claim 6. The flexible display assembly according to claim 1, wherein the support member comprises: a metal supporting plate on which a plurality of strip through holes are provided. *Claim 7 depends either indirectly or directly from claim 6 and is therefore allowable for at least the same reason. Claim 8. The flexible display assembly according to claim 1, further comprising: a second spacer layer on a side, away from the flexible display panel, of the support member, an orthographic projection of the second spacer layer on the support member being within the support member, the first end of the support member protruding out of the second spacer layer. Claim 20. A method for preparing the flexible display device according to claim 19, wherein the method comprises: providing the reel to which the barrier plate is rotatably coupled; providing the flexible display assembly, the flexible display assembly comprising the support member, the flexible display panel and the cover layer that are stacked in sequence; rotating the barrier plate to form an included angle between the barrier plate and the reel; bonding the side of the first end, away from the flexible display panel, of the support member to the reel; and coating the bonding portion on a side of the first end, away from the reel, of the support member, and rotating the barrier plate so that the barrier plate is bonded to the bonding portion and lapped on a side, away from the support member, of the cover layer. Claims 9-17 and 19 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter – claim 9 includes or adequately recites the allowable subject matter, i.e., “A flexible display assembly, comprising: a support member; a flexible display panel on a side of the support member, a width of the flexible display panel being less than a width of the support member, a first end of the support member protruding out of the flexible display panel; a cover layer group on a side, away from the support member, of the flexible display panel, the width of the flexible display panel being less than a width of the cover layer group, a first end of the cover layer group protruding out of the flexible display panel, the cover layer group, the flexible display panel and the first end of the support member forming a structure with two protruding sides and a depressed middle; and a bonding portion bonded between the first end of the support member and the first end of the cover layer group; wherein the cover layer group comprises: a cover layer on the side, away from the support member, of the flexible display panel, a width of the cover layer being less than the width of the support member; and a barrier plate on a side, away from the support member, of the cover layer, a first end of the barrier plate being bonded to the bonding portion, and a second end opposite to the first end being lapped on the side, away from the support member, of the cover layer.” These limitations, in combination with the remaining elements, are not taught or adequately suggested in the prior art of record, nor would it have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to further modify the prior art to address said deficiencies. *Claims 10-17 and 19 depend either directly or indirectly from claim 9 and are therefore allowed for at least the same reason. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Liu – 2023/0124365, Figs 3-4. Teaches similar device/structure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RASHEN E MORRISON whose telephone number is (571)272-8852. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Imani Hayman can be reached at 571-270-5528. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RASHEN E MORRISON/ Examiner, Art Unit 2841 /IMANI N HAYMAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2841
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 05, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748465
FOLDING MECHANISM AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744171
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739987
FOLDABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12724460
Display Device
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720688
ATTACHMENT STRUCTURE OF FLEXIBLE DISPLAY IN ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+11.3%)
2y 1m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 622 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month