Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/199,500

IMAGING DEVICE, IMAGING METHOD, AND IMAGING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 06, 2025
Priority
May 09, 2024 — JP 2024-076367
Examiner
HANNETT, JAMES M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
913 granted / 1084 resolved
+24.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
1105
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
59.7%
+19.7% vs TC avg
§102
34.0%
-6.0% vs TC avg
§112
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1084 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
CTNF 19/199,500 CTNF 79660 DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 5/6/2025 was filed in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 07-06 AIA 15-10-15 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 07-20-aia AIA The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 1: Claim(s) 1-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WO 2022176621 A1 Kiyohara in view of US 2020/0380645 A1 Ishii. 2: As for Claim 1, Claim 1 is rejected for reasons discussed related to Claim 8. 3: As for Claim 2, Claim 2 is rejected for reasons discussed related to Claim 8. 4: As for Claim 3, Claim 3 is rejected for reasons discussed related to Claim 8. 5: As for Claim 4, Kiyohara depicts in Figures 2D and 7A and teaches in the abstract and on Page 5 wherein the spectroscopic element (10) is a filter array including a plurality of filters with different transmission spectra from each other, and the multispectral image data is generated based on the image data and a restoration table determined based on a spatial distribution of the transmission spectra of the plurality of filters. 6: As for Claim 5, Kiyohara further depicts in Figures 3, 8A and 8B and teaches in Page 15 comprising a display (50) that displays a plurality of images indicated by the pieces of image information, respectively. 7: As for Claim 6, Kiyohara depicts in Figure 8B and teaches on Page 3 wherein, by receiving a user operation of selecting one or a plurality of images from the images displayed on the display, the input interface receives the selection information indicating the wavelength band selected by the user. Kiyohara teaches different wavelength ranges can be selected by the user to generate the output image. 8: As for Claim 7, Claim 7 is rejected for reasons discussed related to Claim 8. 9: As for Claim 8, Kiyohara teaches in the abstract and depicts in Figures 2D and 3 and An imaging system comprising: an imaging device (10, 20 and 30); and an image processing device (60) communicably connected to the imaging device (10, 20 and 30), the imaging device 10, 20 and 30 including: an image sensor (20) that captures a subject image via an optical system (30) to generate image data; a spectroscopic element (10) disposed between the optical system (30) and the image sensor (20), the spectroscopic element (10) dispersing incident light into more than three plurality of wavelength bands (see page 13); a communication interface (connection between 20 and 60) that sends the image data to the image processing device (60); an input interface (GUI) that receives selection information indicating a wavelength band selected by a user from the plurality of wavelength bands (band selection can be made as depicted in Figure 8B and discussed on Page 15); wherein the image processing device (60) generates, based on the image data received from the imaging device (10, 20 and 30), multispectral image data (hyperspectral image data) including pieces of image information each corresponding to one of the plurality of wavelength bands and transmits the multispectral image data to the imaging device (see Page 3). However, Kiyohara does not teach controlling the focus of the camera system based on the captured image. Ishii teaches a camera system that enables a user to perform focus control furthermore, Ishii teaches in Paragraph [0026] a controller that controls a focus position of the optical system, and the controller controls the focus position based on a piece of image information (face area image data) corresponding to the wavelength band in order to improve image quality. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to perform the focus control as taught by Ishii in the hyperspectral imaging system of Kiyohara in order to improve image quality. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES M HANNETT whose telephone number is (571)272-7309. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 AM-5:00 PM Monday thru Thursday. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Twyler Haskins can be reached at 571-272-7406 The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /JAMES M HANNETT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2639 JMH June 15, 2026 Application/Control Number: 19/199,500 Page 2 Art Unit: 2639 Application/Control Number: 19/199,500 Page 3 Art Unit: 2639
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 06, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12675862
ELECTRONIC DEVICE WITH FOCAL LENGTH DETERMINING METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12666148
ENTROPY MAXIMIZATION BASED AUTO-EXPOSURE
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659597
Electronic Devices and Corresponding Methods for Dynamically and Automatically Selecting Exposure Values for Bracketing Operations Generating High Dynamic Range (HDR) Images
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12660354
IMAGE SENSING DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659610
IMAGE SENSOR INCLUDING PIXEL CIRCUITS FOR EVENT DETECTION CONNECTED TO A COLUMN SIGNAL LINE
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+0.5%)
2y 3m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1084 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month