Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/200,103

HYBRID MATERIAL-BASED SUBMARINE RADOME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 06, 2025
Priority
Jan 03, 2025 — RE 10-2025-0000597
Examiner
DUONG, DIEU HIEN
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kns Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
823 granted / 1052 resolved
+10.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1070
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
51.8%
+11.8% vs TC avg
§102
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§112
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1052 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ryu (KR 102462750) in view of Richardson (US 2026/0081355). Regarding claim 1, Ryu discloses in Figure 2, a hybrid material-based submarine radome comprising: a cap (10) having an open interior and having an insert provided on an inner perimeter thereof; a bracket (20); and a body (30), wherein the bracket (20) includes a threaded part (21) corresponding with the insert (11), the bracket (20) is securable to the cap in a manner of a screw, and the bracket (20) is formed from a metallic material (see par. 0007). Ryu is silent on the cap comprising a cap hemisphere and a cap cylinder. However, such differences are not patentable merit. A cap comprising a cap hemisphere and a cap cylinder to protect antenna from environment is well known in the art. One of such examples is the teaching of Richardson, Figure 2, the cap comprising a cap hemisphere (102) having an open interior; a cap cylinder (104) having an open interior and an insert provided on an inner perimeter thereof. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of claimed invention Regarding claim 2, Ryu discloses in Figure 3, further comprising a cap O- ring (33) for airtight. Ryu does not disclose the O-ring between the cap hemisphere and the cap cylinder. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of claimed invention to include O-ring between the cap hemisphere and the cap cylinder to achieve airtight for the radome. Therefore, to employ having the O-ring as claimed invention would have been obvious to person skill in the art. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Inquiry Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DIEU HIEN T DUONG whose telephone number is (571)272-8980. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00am-4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DIMARY CRUZ LOPEZ can be reached at 571-270-7893. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DIEU HIEN T DUONG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 06, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749816
DUAL BAND IFA WITH OVERLAPPING ELEMENTS
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744311
RADIAL LINE SLOT ANTENNA ARRAYS
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744307
BASE STATION ANTENNA AND BASE STATION
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12731889
ELECTROMAGNITIC-WAVE RADIATION SYSTEM, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12725938
ANTENNA DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+16.5%)
2y 7m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1052 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month