Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/200,598

ROTATING AND TELESCOPING EXHAUST FOR AIR HANDLING TRANSPORT

Final Rejection §102
Filed
May 06, 2025
Priority
Jul 26, 2024 — continuation of 12/320,284
Examiner
AYALA DELGADO, ANTHONY
Art Unit
3746
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Typhon Technology Solutions (U.S.), LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
563 granted / 708 resolved
+9.5% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
736
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
59.4%
+19.4% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 708 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 12, 16, 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 9,534,473 to Morris et al. (Morris) In Reference to Claim 1 Morris discloses: [AltContent: textbox (A)][AltContent: connector][AltContent: connector] PNG media_image1.png 676 497 media_image1.png Greyscale An air handling transport comprising: a base frame 416, see col. 11 line 32-37; an air housing mounted 502 to the base frame, the air housing including a combustion air plenum 404 on a longitudinal side of the air handling transport, the combustion air plenum outputting filtered combustion air; and an exhaust stack 504 mounted to the base frame for releasing combustion exhaust air, wherein the exhaust stack is vertically oriented and rotatable about a vertical axis A between the longitudinal side in an operation mode and an end side in a transportation mode, see col. 13 line 1-12. In Reference to Claim 12 Morris discloses: A system for generating mobile electric power, the system comprising: a power generation transport including a gas turbine 407, a generator 408, an inlet plenum 404, and an exhaust collector; and an air handling transport including: a base frame 416, see col. 11 line 32-37; an air housing 502 mounted to the base frame, the air housing including a combustion air plenum on a longitudinal side of the air handling transport, the combustion air plenum connected to the inlet plenum of the gas turbine in an operation mode, see col. 10 line 42-55; and an exhaust stack mounted 504 to the base frame, the exhaust stack being rotatable between the longitudinal side in the operation mode and an end side in a transportation mode, see col.13 line 1-12 In Reference to Claim 16 Morris discloses: A method for generating mobile electric power, the method comprising: connecting, in an operation mode, a combustion air plenum of an air housing on a longitudinal side of an air handling transport to an inlet plenum of a gas turbine 407 of a power generation transport, see col. 11 line 32-37; rotating, in the operation mode, an exhaust stack 504 wherein the exhaust stack is vertically oriented and rotatable about a vertical axis A wherein the exhaust stack is rotatable between the longitudinal side in the operation mode and an end side of the air handling transport in a transportation mode, see Fig.5a and 5b; and connecting the exhaust stack in the operation mode to an exhaust collector of the gas turbine of the power generation transport see col. 10 line 56-60 and see col. 13 line 1-12. In Reference to Claim 20 Morris discloses: operating a black start generator 408 mounted on the air handling transport to provide power to start the gas turbine of the power generation transport; see col. 10 line 31-35. and generating electricity by providing rotational energy of the gas turbine to a generator, see col. 10 line 3-10. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2-11, 13-15, 17-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims, primarily because the prior art of record cannot anticipate Applicant’s claimed invention by a single reference nor render Applicant’s claimed invention obvious by the combination of more than one reference. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Furthermore, the prior art of record does not teach “wherein the exhaust stack includes a gear on a bottom surface to rotate the exhaust stack between the longitudinal side in the operation mode and the end side in the transportation mode.” as within the context of the claimed invention as disclosed and within the context of the other limitations present in claim 2; The prior art of record does not teach “wherein the exhaust stack includes a stack base having an exhaust plenum and a stack extension, the stack extension being housed within the stack base in the transportation mode and capable of extending vertically by a predetermined vertical distance in the operation mode.” as within the context of the claimed invention as disclosed and within the context of the other limitations present in claim 4; and The prior art of record does not teach “wherein the exhaust stack includes a stack base having an exhaust plenum and a stack extension, the stack extension being housed within the stack base in the transportation mode and capable of extending vertically by a predetermined vertical distance in the operation mode.” as within the context of the claimed invention as disclosed and within the context of the other limitations present in claim 13. The prior art of record does not teach “operating first and second expansion connections, the first expansion connection extending the combustion air plenum outward from the air housing of the air handling transport, the second expansion connection extending a ventilation air plenum outward from the air housing of the air handling transport.” as within the context of the claimed invention as disclosed and within the context of the other limitations present in claim 17. Therefore, the prior art of record cannot anticipate Applicant’s claimed invention by a single reference nor render Applicant’s claimed invention obvious by the combination of more than one reference. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 04/15/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant Argument: Respectfully submits “wherein the exhaust stack is oriented and rotatable about a vertical axis between the longitudinal side in an operation mode and an end side in a transportation mode” Examiner Response: As shown in claim rejection above the vertical axis is discloses. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY AYALA DELGADO whose telephone number is (571)270-3452. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark III Laurenzi can be reached on (571) 270-7878. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY AYALA DELGADO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3746
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 06, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 15, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680485
EXHAUST-GAS TREATMENT ARRANGEMENT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680546
LIQUID SEPARATION DEVICE FOR A COMPRESSOR SYSTEM AND COMPRESSOR SYSTEM HAVING SUCH A LIQUID SEPARATION DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674458
FIXED SCROLL ASSEMBLY AND SCROLL COMPRESSOR
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674447
DIAPHRAGM FASTENING TO THE DRIVE OF METERING PUMPS
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669125
SCROLL COMPRESSOR AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+17.2%)
2y 6m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 708 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month