Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 19/202,462

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT OF SAW RESONATOR BY SELECTIVELY CHANGING AMOUNT OF MATERIALS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 08, 2025
Priority
May 15, 2024 — provisional 63/647,912
Examiner
YALDO, ABIGAIL AMIR
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Qorvo US Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allowance Rate
55 granted / 59 resolved
+33.2% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
75
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
§102
36.5%
-3.5% vs TC avg
§112
40.5%
+0.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 59 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: In paragraph [0078], reference numerals 50 and 150 both are defined as the “passivation structure” and thereby is unclear which recitation is the “passivation structure” as disclosed. Appropriate correction is required. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they do not include the following reference sign(s) mentioned in the description: Reference Label 50 in paragraph [0078] of the specification, designated as “passivation structure” is not shown in the figures. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 14 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Goto (US 20230327645). As per Claims 1-2, 14 and 21: Goto discloses in Figure 5A: A surface acoustic wave resonator (SAW) (“acoustic wave device”, 500) comprising an interdigital transducer (IDT) (“IDT”, 508) over a piezoelectric structure (“piezoelectric material”, 506) exposing portions of the piezoelectric structure through the IDT (as is evident by the exposing portions of 506 through 508 as further shown in related Figures 5D and 5E) and the IDT comprising a plurality of first and second electrode fingers (“electrode fingers of each IDT”, [0119]) extending in a transverse direction and interleaved with one another along a longitudinal direction orthogonal to the transverse direction (as is evident by the interleaving of the fingers in Figure 5A, [0119]), with a passivation structure (“protective layer”, 1818, as shown by the identical structure, [0174], in related Figure 18D) at least partially covering the IDT and the exposed surfaces (as is evident by 1818 covering the identical “IDT” 1808 and exposed “piezoelectric material” 1806 in related Figure 18D), and the IDT having at least one edge region (“edge regions”, E) extending in a longitudinal direction spanning across certain ones of the plurality of first and second electrode fingers (as is evident by Figure 5A where the edge portions E span longitudinally and overlap with the IDT fingers connected to the “second bus bars” 512), wherein the at least one edge region (E) is realized in the IDT by at least one (as per claim 1) or both (as per claim 21) thickness variation of a thickness variation of the piezoelectric structure (as per claims 1 and 2, 506) and a thickness variation of the passivation structure (as per claims 1 and 14, 1818, the effective thickness of the IDTs 508 (corresponding to IDTs 1808) is increased by the trench portions 510 (corresponding to trench portions 1810) within the edge regions E, [0127], therefore the thickness of the piezoelectric structure is varied and the protective layer 1818 is also inherently varied due to the placement above the trench portions 1810 and above the IDTs 508 and 1808 as shown in identical Figure 18D, [0182]), and wherein an acoustic wave propagates in the at least one edge region (E) at a different velocity than other regions in the IDT (508, the trench portions 510 slow down the acoustic velocity at the edge of the active region, [0123], the edge corresponding to the “edge regions” E and therefore having a differing velocity than the “central region” C). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-13, 15-20, and 22-24 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ABIGAIL YALDO whose telephone number is (703)756-1784. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7 AM - 4 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Andrea Lindgren Baltzell can be reached at (571) 272-5918. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ABIGAIL AMIR YALDO/ Examiner, Art Unit 2843 /ANDREA LINDGREN BALTZELL/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 08, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706360
DUAL-MODE DIELECTRIC WAVEGUIDE FILTER AND DIELECTRIC WAVEGUIDE FILTERING APPARATUS
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706363
HIGH-FREQUENCY LINE CONNECTION STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700653
DESIGN OF STACKED DOUBLE JUNCTION CIRCULATOR DEVICE AND METHODS FOR FABRICATION
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12694255
DYNAMIC TUNING OF AN RFID RECEIVER TO ACHIEVE SUBSTANTIALLY MAXIMUM RECEIVED SIGNAL STRENGTH
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695439
ACOUSTIC WAVE FILTER DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.2%)
2y 3m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 59 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month