Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/202,587

NFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
May 08, 2025
Priority
Jul 31, 2019 — JP 2019-141194 +2 more
Examiner
CZEKAJ, DAVID J
Art Unit
2484
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
Est. Remaining
42%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allowance Rate
120 granted / 241 resolved
-8.2% vs TC avg
Minimal -8% lift
Without
With
+-7.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 11m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
265
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
§103
67.8%
+27.8% vs TC avg
§102
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
§112
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 241 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Instant Application Patent No. 12,322,416 (Claim 2) 2. (New) An information processing apparatus, comprising: at least one camera configured to capture a play video of a ball, the play video including a plurality of video frames; and processing circuitry configured to analyze the plurality of video frames to determine at least one of a spin speed or a rotation direction of the ball, generate visual information including at least one of a numerical value of the determined spin speed or a value indicting indicating the determined rotation direction of the ball, and superimpose and display the visual information, including displaying the generated at least one of the numerical value of the determined spin speed or the value indicating the determined rotation direction of the ball, on at least one of the plurality of video frames. (Claim 3) 3. (New) The information processing apparatus according to claim 2. wherein the visual information includes a visual effect indicating a characteristic of the ball on or around the ball. (Claim 4) 4. (New) The information processing apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the visual effect is displayed differently depending on the characteristic of the ball. (Claim 5) 5. (New) The information processing apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the visual effect indicates the characteristic of the ball by a movement. (Claim 6) 6. (New) The information processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to determine the at least one of the spin speed or the rotation direction of the ball based on analysis of a logo on the ball in the play video. (Claim 7) 7. (New) The information processing apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to determine the at least one of the spin speed or the rotation direction of the ball based on analysis of a movement of the logo between the video frames of the play video. (Claim 8) 8. (New) The information processing apparatus according to claim 2,wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to perform an analysis of a play based on the play video, and the processing circuitry is further configured to extract a scene to be edited from the play video based on a result of the analysis of the play. (Claim 9) 9.(New) The information processing apparatus according to claim 2. wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to superimpose the visual information on the play video after stopping the play video such that a characteristic of the ball is displayed on or around the ball stopped in the play video. (Claim 10) 10. (New)The information processing apparatus according to claim 2, further comprising a display controller configured to control display of the play video on which the visual information is superimposed. (Claim 11) 11. (New) The information processing apparatus according to claim 2, further comprising a display controller configured to perform control to superimpose the visual information on the play video and display the video in a field of view of a user. (Claim 12) 12. (New) The information processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the visual information further indicates a trajectory of the ball. (Claim 13) 13. (New) The information processing apparatus according to claim wherein the visual information intermittently indicates positions of the ball in the trajectory of the ball. (Claim 14) 14. (New) The information processing apparatus according to claim 13, wherein the visual information further indicates a characteristic of the ball in at least some of the positions of the ball. (Claim 15) 15. (New) The information processing apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the visual information indicates the trajectory of the ball by a line. (Claim 16) 16. (New) The information processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the visual information further indicates a position where the ball hits a racket. (Claim 17) 17. (New) The information processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the visual information further indicates a trajectory of a swing. (Claim 18) 18. (New) The information processing apparatus according to claim 2,wherein the visual information further indicates a distribution of positions where the ball bounces within a court. (Claim 19) 19. (New) A method for processing information, the method comprising: capturing, by at least one camera, a play video of a ball, the play video including a plurality of video frames; analyzing the plurality of video frames to determine at least one of a spin speed or a rotation direction of the ball; generating visual information including at least one of a numerical value of the determined spin speed or a value indicting indicating the determined rotation direction of the ball, and superimposing and displaying the visual information, including displaying the generated at least one of the numerical value of the determined spin speed or the value indicating the determined rotation direction of the ball, on at least one of the plurality of video frames. (Claim 20) 20. (New)A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing a program that, when executed, causes a computer to execute a method comprising: capturing, by at least one camera, a play video of a ball, the play video including a plurality of video frames; analyzing the plurality of video frames to determine at least one of a spin speed or a rotation direction of the ball; generating visual information including at least one of a numerical value of the determined spin speed or a value indicating the determined rotation direction of the ball, and superimposing and displaying the visual information, including displaying the generated at least one of the numerical value of the determined spin speed or the value indicating the determined rotation direction of the ball, on at least one of the plurality of video frames. (Claim 21) 21. (New) The information processing apparatus of claim 2, wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to superimpose and display the numerical value of the determined spin speed on the at least one of the plurality of video frames. (Claim 1) 1. An information processing apparatus, comprising: at least one camera configured to capture a play video of a table tennis ball, the play video including a plurality of video frames; and processing circuitry configured to analyze the plurality of video frames to determine at least one of a spin speed or a rotation direction of the table tennis ball, generate visual information including at least one of a numerical value of the determined spin speed or a value indicating the determined rotation direction of the table tennis ball, and superimpose and display the visual information, including displaying the generated at least one of the numerical value of the determined spin speed or the value indicating the determined rotation direction of the table tennis ball, on at least one of the plurality of video frames. (Claim 2) 2. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the visual information includes a visual effect indicating a characteristic of the ball on or around the table tennis ball. (Claim 3) 3. The information processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the visual effect is displayed differently depending on the characteristic of the table tennis ball. (Claim 4) 4. The information processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the visual effect indicates the characteristic of the table tennis ball by a movement. (Claim 5) 5. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to determine the at least one of the spin speed or the rotation direction of the table tennis ball based on analysis of a logo on the table tennis ball in the play video. (Claim 6) 6. The information processing apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to determine the at least one of the spin speed or the rotation direction of the table tennis ball based on analysis of a movement of the logo between the video frames of the play video. (Claim 7) 7. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to perform an analysis of a play based on the play video, and the processing circuitry is further configured to extract a scene to be edited from the play video based on a result of the analysis of the play. (Claim 8) 8. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to superimpose the visual information on the play video after stopping the play video such that a characteristic of the table tennis ball is displayed on or around the table tennis ball stopped in the play video. (Claim 9) 9. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising: a display controller configured to control display of the play video on which the visual information is superimposed. (Claim 10) 10. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising: a display controller configured to perform control to superimpose the visual information on the play video and display the video in a field of view of a user. (Claim 11) 11. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the visual information further indicates a trajectory of the table tennis ball. (Claim 12) 12. The information processing apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the visual information intermittently indicates positions of the table tennis ball in the trajectory of the ball. (Claim 13) 13. The information processing apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the visual information further indicates a characteristic of the table tennis ball in at least some of the positions of the table tennis ball. (Claim 14) 14. The information processing apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the visual information indicates the trajectory of the table tennis ball by a line. (Claim 15) 15. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the visual information further indicates a position where the table tennis ball hits a racket. (Claim 16) 16. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the visual information further indicates a trajectory of a swing. (Claim 17) 17. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the visual information further indicates a distribution of positions where the table tennis ball bounces within a court. (Claim 18) 18. A method for processing information, the method comprising: capturing, by at least one camera, a play video of a table tennis ball, the play video including a plurality of video frames; analyzing the plurality of video frames to determine at least one of a spin speed or a rotation direction of the table tennis ball; generating visual information including at least one of a numerical value of the determined spin speed or a value indicating the determined rotation direction of the table tennis ball, and superimposing and displaying the visual information, including displaying the generated at least one of the numerical value of the determined spin speed or the value indicating the determined rotation direction of the table tennis ball, on at least one of the plurality of video frames. (Claim 19) 19. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing a program that, when executed, causes a computer to execute a method comprising: capturing, by at least one camera, a play video of a table tennis ball, the play video including a plurality of video frames; analyzing the plurality of video frames to determine at least one of a spin speed or a rotation direction of the table tennis ball; generating visual information including at least one of a numerical value of the determined spin speed or a value indicating the determined rotation direction of the table tennis ball, and superimposing and displaying the visual information, including displaying the generated at least one of the numerical value of the determined spin speed or the value indicating the determined rotation direction of the table tennis ball, on at least one of the plurality of video frames. (Claim 20) 20. The information processing apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to superimpose and display the numerical value of the determined spin speed on the at least one of the plurality of video frames. Claims 2-21 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of Patent No. US 12,322,416. Re claim 2, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 2 of the Instant Application is anticipated by claim 1 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 3, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 3 of the Instant Application is recited in claim 2 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 4, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 4 of the Instant Application is recited in claim 3 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 5, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 5 of the Instant Application is recited in claim 4 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 6, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 6 of the Instant Application is recited in claim 5 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 7, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 7 of the Instant Application is recited in claim 6 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 8, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 8 of the Instant Application is recited in claim 7 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 9, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 9 of the Instant Application is recited in claim 8 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 10, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 10 of the Instant Application is recited in claim 9 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 11, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 11 of the Instant Application is recited in claim 10 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 12, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 12 of the Instant Application is recited in claim 11 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 13, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 13 of the Instant Application is recited in claim 12 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 14, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 14 of the Instant Application is recited in claim 13 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 15, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 15 of the Instant Application is recited in claim 14 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 16, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 16 of the Instant Application is recited in claim 15 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 17, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 17 of the Instant Application is recited in claim 16 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 18, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 18 of the Instant Application is recited in claim 17 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 19, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 19 of the Instant Application is anticipated by claim 18 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 20, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 20 of the Instant Application is anticipated by claim 19 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Re claim 21, the conflicting claims are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 21 of the Instant Application is recited in claim 20 of the Patent No. 12,322,416. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSE M MESA whose telephone number is (571)270-1706. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30AM-6:00PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thai Tran can be reached at 571-272-7382. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. 6/16/2026 /JOSE M. MESA/ Examiner Art Unit 2484 /THAI Q TRAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2484
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 08, 2025
Application Filed
Dec 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749331
METHOD, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR RECOGNIZING CHART
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12739317
ADU ASSOCIATION METHOD AND COMPUTER DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12651328
FULL-SPACE INTELLIGENT DETECTION METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE NETWORKS, AS WELL AS STORAGE MEDIA
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12639952
Egress Obstruction Detection via Computer Vision
2y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634493
METHOD FOR IMAGE COMPRESSION AND APPARATUS FOR IMPLEMENTING THE SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
42%
With Interview (-7.5%)
4y 11m (~3y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 241 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month