Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/202,897

REDUCING MOTION VECTOR INFORMATION TRANSMISSION IN BI-DIRECTIONAL TEMPORAL PREDICTION

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
May 08, 2025
Priority
Apr 06, 2018 — provisional 62/654,073 +5 more
Examiner
HABIB, IRFAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Arris Enterprises LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
655 granted / 745 resolved
+27.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
769
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
83.5%
+43.5% vs TC avg
§102
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 745 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION 1. This office action is in response to U.S. Patent Application No.: 19/202,897 filed on 5/8/2025 with effective filing date 4/6/2018. Claims 13-24 are pending. Double Patenting 2. The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. 3. Claims 13-24 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-12 of U.S. Patent No. 12323601 and claims 1-10 of U.S. Patent No. 11533492. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. Example below. Current Application US 12323601 13. A method of decoding a video with a decoder that includes a processor included in a bitstream comprising: (a) receiving a rectangular coding unit of a coding tree unit of samples included in a bi-predictive B-slice of a current frame of said video; (b) receiving a first motion vector associated with said coding unit of said bi-predictive B-slice of said current frame of said video referencing a temporally previous reference slice of a temporally previous reference frame relative to said current frame of said coding unit; (c) receiving a second motion vector associated with said coding unit of said bi-predictive B-slice of said current frame of said video referencing a temporally future reference slice of a temporally future reference frame relative to said current frame of said coding unit; (d) applying an optical flow between said temporally previous reference slice and said temporally future reference slice to perform a sample based motion modification using a corrective motion vector applied to predicted arrays based upon at least one of said first motion vector and said second motion vector; and (e) decoding said coding unit based upon said sample based motion modification as a result of said applying said optical flow between said temporally previous reference slice and said temporally future reference slice. 1. A method of decoding a video with a decoder that includes a processor included in a bitstream comprising: (a) receiving a rectangular coding unit of a coding tree unit of luma samples included in a bi-predictive B-slice of a current frame of said video; (b) receiving a first motion vector associated with said coding unit of said bi-predictive B-slice of said current frame of said video referencing a temporally previous reference slice of a temporally previous reference frame relative to said current frame of said coding unit; (c) receiving a second motion vector associated with said coding unit of said bi-predictive B-slice of said current frame of said video referencing a temporally future reference slice of a temporally future reference frame relative to said current frame of said coding unit; (d) applying an optical flow between said temporally previous reference slice and said temporally future reference slice to perform a sample based motion modification using a corrective motion vector applied to predicted arrays based upon at least one of said first motion vector and said second motion vector; and (e) decoding said coding unit based upon said sample based motion modification as a result of said applying said optical flow between said temporally previous reference slice and said temporally future reference slice. 23. A bitstream of compressed video for decoding by a decoder that includes a processor, including a non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing the compressed video, the method comprising: (a) said bitstream containing data indicating a rectangular coding unit of a coding tree unit of samples included in a bi-predictive B-slice of a current frame of said video; (b) said bitstream containing data indicating a first motion vector associated with said coding unit of said bi-predictive B-slice of said current frame of said video referencing a temporally previous reference slice of a temporally previous reference frame relative to said current frame of said coding unit; (c) said bitstream containing data indicating a second motion vector associated with said coding unit of said bi-predictive B-slice of said current frame of said video referencing a temporally future reference slice of a temporally future reference frame relative to said current frame of said coding unit; (d) said bitstream containing data indicating an optical flow between said temporally previous reference slice and said temporally future reference slice to perform a sample based motion modification using a corrective motion vector applied to predicted arrays based upon at least one of said first motion vector and said second motion vector; and (e) said bitstream containing data indicating said coding unit based upon said sample based motion modification as a result of said applying said optical flow between said temporally previous reference slice and said temporally future reference slice. 11. A bitstream of compressed video for decoding by a decoder that includes a processor, including a non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing the compressed video, the method comprising: (a) said bitstream containing data indicating a rectangular coding unit of a coding tree unit of luma samples included in a bi-predictive B-slice of a current frame of said video; (b) said bitstream containing data indicating a first motion vector associated with said coding unit of said bi-predictive B-slice of said current frame of said video referencing a temporally previous reference slice of a temporally previous reference frame relative to said current frame of said coding unit; (c) said bitstream containing data indicating a second motion vector associated with said coding unit of said bi-predictive B-slice of said current frame of said video referencing a temporally future reference slice of a temporally future reference frame relative to said current frame of said coding unit; (d) said bitstream containing data indicating an optical flow between said temporally previous reference slice and said temporally future reference slice to perform a sample based motion modification using a corrective motion vector applied to predicted arrays based upon at least one of said first motion vector and said second motion vector; and (e) said bitstream containing data indicating said coding unit based upon said sample based motion modification as a result of said applying said optical flow between said temporally previous reference slice and said temporally future reference slice. 24. A method of encoding a video included in a bitstream by an encoder that includes a processor comprising: (a) providing an encoded bitstream including a rectangular coding unit of a coding tree unit of samples included in a bi-predictive B-slice of a current frame of said video; (b) providing an encoded bitstream including a first motion vector associated with said coding unit of said bi-predictive B-slice of said current frame of said video referencing a temporally previous reference slice of a temporally previous reference frame relative to said current frame of said coding unit; (c) providing an encoded bitstream including a second motion vector associated with said coding unit of said bi-predictive B-slice of said current frame of said video referencing a temporally future reference slice of a temporally future reference frame relative to said current frame of said coding unit; (d) providing an encoded bitstream including an optical flow between said temporally previous reference slice and said temporally future reference slice to perform a sample based motion modification using a corrective motion vector applied to predicted arrays based upon at least one of said first motion vector and said second motion vector; and (e) providing an encoded bitstream including said coding unit based upon said sample based motion modification as a result of said applying said optical flow between said temporally previous reference slice and said temporally future reference slice. 12. A method of encoding a video included in a bitstream by an encoder that includes a processor comprising: (a) providing an encoded bitstream including a rectangular coding unit of a coding tree unit of luma samples included in a bi-predictive B-slice of a current frame of said video; (b) providing an encoded bitstream including a first motion vector associated with said coding unit of said bi-predictive B-slice of said current frame of said video referencing a temporally previous reference slice of a temporally previous reference frame relative to said current frame of said coding unit; (c) providing an encoded bitstream including a second motion vector associated with said coding unit of said bi-predictive B-slice of said current frame of said video referencing a temporally future reference slice of a temporally future reference frame relative to said current frame of said coding unit; (d) providing an encoded bitstream including an optical flow between said temporally previous reference slice and said temporally future reference slice to perform a sample based motion modification using a corrective motion vector applied to predicted arrays based upon at least one of said first motion vector and said second motion vector; and (e) providing an encoded bitstream including said coding unit based upon said sample based motion modification as a result of said applying said optical flow between said temporally previous reference slice and said temporally future reference slice. Allowable Subject Matter After analyzing the current application examiner concluded that the novelty of the current application involves receiving a rectangular coding unit of a coding tree unit of samples included in a bi-predictive B-slice of a current frame of the video. A first motion vector associated with the coding unit of the bi-predictive B-slice of the current frame of the video referencing a temporally previous reference slice of a temporally previous reference frame relative to the current frame of the coding unit is received. An optical flow is applied between the temporally previous reference slice and the temporally future reference slice to perform a sample based motion modification using a corrective motion vector applied to predicted arrays based upon one of the first motion vector and the second motion vector. The prior art of record in particular, Yu et al. US 2013/0003851 A1 in view of Bossen et al. US 2011/0080954 A1 does not disclose, with respect to claim 13, (c) receiving a second motion vector associated with said coding unit of said bi- predictive B-slice of said current frame of said video referencing a temporally future reference slice of a temporally future reference frame relative to said current frame of said coding unit; (d) applying an optical flow between said temporally previous reference slice and said temporally future reference slice to perform a sample based motion modification using a corrective motion vector applied to predicted arrays based upon at least one of said first motion vector and said second motion vector; and (e) decoding said coding unit based upon said sample based motion modification as a result of said applying said optical flow between said temporally previous reference slice and said temporally future reference slice as claimed. Rather, Yu et al. discloses the method enables unchanging current indexing if only one PU is within the CU and an index for a left neighbor block is smaller than that for an above neighbor block, thus improving coding performance. The method enables utilizing a loop filter performing a sample adaptive offset process after completion of a decoding-blocking filter process for a decoded picture, which compensates for a pixel value offset between reconstructed pixels and original pixels, and performing adaptive loop filtering over the reconstructed PU, thus minimizing coding distortion between input and output pictures. Similarly, Bossen et al. discloses the method involves deriving N motion vector predictors for a block that contains N motion vectors corresponding to N lists of reference frame and a current frame by constructing one of the N motion vector predictors when another block that neighbors the block and is used for predication has invalid motion vectors, where N is an integer greater than 1. The N differential motion vectors is generated based on the N motion vectors and N motion vector predictors. The N-differential motion vectors are encoded. The same reasoning applies to claim 23 & 24. Conclusion 5. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to IRFAN HABIB whose telephone number is (571)270-7325. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Th 9AM-7PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jay Patel can be reached at 5712722988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Irfan Habib/Examiner, Art Unit 2485
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 08, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676986
IMAGE ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING REFERENCE SAMPLE FILTERING ON BASIS OF INTRA PREDICTION MODE, AND METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING BITSTREAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671802
METHOD, DEVICE, AND MEDIUM FOR VIDEO PROCESSING
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671821
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADAPTIVE EXTRAPOLATION FILTER BASED INTRA PREDICTION MODE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12659458
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ENCODING/DECODING IMAGES
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659459
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INTER PREDICTION IN VIDEO PROCESSING SYSTEM
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+8.5%)
2y 1m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 745 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month