Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/202,990

MOBILE KEY USER INTERFACES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 08, 2025
Priority
Nov 05, 2020 — provisional 63/110,272 +1 more
Examiner
GILES, EBONI N
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
Est. Remaining
72%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
447 granted / 704 resolved
+3.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
739
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
93.9%
+53.9% vs TC avg
§102
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§112
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 704 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This office action is in response to the application filed 5/8/2025 in which Claims 1-22 are pending. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1, 5, 16, 21, 22 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 18, 19 of U.S. Patent No. 12,311,880 in view of U.S. Patent Publication 2013/0285816 to Sezanayev. Claims 1, 21 and 22 each describe displaying a user interface to provide the first secure credential authorization to use one or more functions of a vehicle, receiving a sequence of user inputs to restrict use of the first secure credential to authorize a function for a predetermined period of time equivalent to the co-pending patent claims of 1, 18 and 19. Co-pending patent claims 1, 18 and 19 do not expressly disclose while use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions is restricted, receiving biometric information; and in response to receiving the biometric information: in accordance with a determination that the biometric information satisfies unlocking criteria, restoring use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions and in accordance with a determination that the biometric information does not satisfy unlocking criteria, maintaining restriction of use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions. Sezanayev teaches an alcohol level sensor 10 is located not on a vehicle door, but instead on a door key 10. The door key-located sensor 10 senses whether an alcohol level in a potential driver is within an allowable range or outside of the allowable range through touching the door key 10 of fingers and/or hand by the potential driver. Such a sensor can be formed as a known transdermal sensor which can sense an alcohol level in blood of a potential driver through his skin (see ¶ 0038) FIG. 5a shows an alcohol level a sensor 10' which is arranged directly on a body 11 of a mechanical key 12, while FIG. 5b shows an alcohol level sensor 10'' located on a push button 13 of a remotely operated key 14. When a potential driver touches the vehicle door key 10, 10', 10'' his alcohol level is sensed and corresponding signals are sent to the door lock 5, the vehicle ignition system 8, or both remotely by means of a transmitter 15 and receivers 16 and 17 so as to allow opening of the door lock 5 (see ¶ 0039). Claim 1 of instant application 19/202,990 Claims of U.S. Patent 12,311,880 1. A computer system configured to communicate with a display generation component and one or more input devices, comprising: one or more processors; and memory storing one or more programs configured to be executed by the one or more processors, the one or more programs including instructions for: 1. A computer system, comprising: a display generation component; one or more input devices; one or more processors; and memory storing one or more programs configured to be executed by the one or more processors, the one or more programs including instructions for: displaying, via the display generation component, a user interface object corresponding to a first secure credential, wherein the first secure credential is enrolled on the computer system and is configured to provide authorization to use one or more functions of a vehicle; displaying, via the display generation component, a user interface object corresponding to a first secure credential stored on the computer system, wherein the first secure credential is enrolled on the computer system and is configured enables the computer system to provide authorization to use one or more functions of a vehicle that is separate from the computer system; while displaying the user interface object corresponding to the first secure credential, detecting, at the computer system, a sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to a request to restrict use of the first secure credential to authorize at least a first function of the one or more functions for a predetermined period of time while displaying the user interface object corresponding to the first secure credential, detecting, at the computer system, a sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to a request to restrict use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize at least a first function of the one or more functions for a predetermined period of time; in response to detecting the sequence of one or more user inputs, restricting use of the first secure credential enrolled on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions in response to detecting the sequence of one or more user inputs, restricting use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions, and while use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions is restricted, receiving biometric information; in response to receiving the biometric information: in accordance with a determination that the biometric information satisfies unlocking criteria, restoring use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions wherein restricting the use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions prohibits the computer system from providing authorization to use the first function of the one or more functions of the vehicle that is separate from the computer system during the predetermined period of time and in accordance with a determination that the biometric information does not satisfy unlocking criteria, maintaining restriction of use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions. and detecting, at the computer system, a second sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to selection of a contactable user from a plurality of contactable users, wherein selection of the contactable user enables the contactable user, using a second external device separate from the computer system, to restore use of the first secure credential enrolled stored on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 4. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 5. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 6. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. 7. Claim(s) 1, 5, 17-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Publication 2018/0186333 to Santiano et al (“Santiano”) in further view of U.S. Patent Publication 2013/0285816 to Sezanayev. As to Claim 1, Santiano discloses a computer system configured to communicate with a display generation component and one or more input devices, comprising: one or more processors (One or more processors 320 may include processors in network server 160 and/or processors in personal device 120, see ¶ 0020; Fig. 1; System 100 may allow for one or more personal devices 120 to transfer electronic keys and associated with an electronic key application (e.g., illustrated in FIGS. 4-13) over network 150 to cloud platform 190 and/or vehicle 130… Cloud platform 190 may comprise one or more network servers 160, see ¶ 0023-0027; Network server 160 may provide authorized user data 252, vehicle data 254, and owner information 256 for use in an electronic key application (as further described with reference to FIGS. 4-13) that is displayed and executed on a personal device 120 operated by a vehicle owner, see ¶ 0032; The GUI [display generation component] may be displayed as part of a screen on a personal device 120, see ¶ 0034); and memory storing one or more programs configured to be executed by the one or more processors (system may further include a storage device configured to store the electronic key and the permission settings, see Abstract; non-transitory computer-readable medium may store instructions executable by one or more processors connected to the cloud network to perform a method, see ¶ 0008; Memory 240 may store among other things, server programs 244 and an operating system 246, see ¶ 0029), Santiano discloses the one or more programs including instructions for: displaying, via the display generation component, a user interface object corresponding to a first secure credential is enrolled on the computer system, and is configured to provide authorization to use one or more functions of a vehicle (Network server 160 may provide authorized user data 252, vehicle data 254, and owner information 256 for use in an electronic key application (as further described with reference to FIGS. 4-13) that is displayed and executed on a personal device 120 operated by a vehicle owner. Based on user input or user interaction with the GUI, network server 160 may receive authorized user data 252, vehicle data 254, and owner information 256 from network 150 through I/O device 230, and may analyze such data to control and/or restrict vehicle 130 permissions by generating/modifying and sending electronic keys, see ¶ 0032; The GUI may be displayed as part of a screen on a personal device 120, see ¶ 0034; graphical user interfaces (GUIs) showing a permission tab and a history tab of an electronic key for editing. Based on user input or user selection to edit electronic key 402 of “David Smith,” one or more editing screens 500 may be displayed for user modification and/or review. In the illustration, permission screen 502 displays touch screen buttons and tabs in order to modify vehicle access permissions for “David Smith.”, see ¶ 0035, Figs. 4 - 5); while displaying the user interface object corresponding to the first secure credential, detecting, at the computer system, a sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to a request to restrict use of the first secure credential to authorize at least a first function of the one or more functions for a predetermined period of time (personal device 120 may store the electronic key [first secure credential] and the permission settings in memory 240 or database 260, see ¶ 0050; a home screen 400 including “Car Info,” “Control,” “Climate,” and “Keys” options for user selection located at the top of the screen. In the illustration, the home screen also includes the option to edit [sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to a request] an electronic key 402 for one or more registered users and to send a new electronic key 404…electronic keys may also include a time limit for use, and expire after the time limit is up. For example, in the illustration, the electronic key for “David Smith,” has 3 days and 16 hours left before it expires [restrict use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize at least a first function of the one or more functions for a predetermined period of time], see ¶ 0034; Fig. 4; based on user input or user selection to edit electronic key 402 of “David Smith,” one or more editing screens 500 may be displayed for user modification and/or review. In the illustration, permission screen 502 displays touch screen buttons and tabs in order to modify vehicle access permissions for “David Smith.” For example, vehicle permissions including permissions to allow driving, set drive duration, set speed limit, and set drive mode are shown. The user may touch the edit permission button to modify these permissions [in response to detecting the sequence of one or more user inputs, restricting use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions, wherein restricting the use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions prohibits the computer system from providing authorization to use the first function of the one or more functions of the vehicle that is separate from the computer system during the predetermined period of time], see ¶ 0035; Fig. 5; when a user selects “Schedule,” the electronic key application proceeds to the schedule screen 1200. Schedule screen 1200 may include options for always permitting electronic key access, on a recurring basis, or for a temporary time period. Specific days of the week permitting electronic key access may be set, and specific times permitting electronic key access may also be set, see ¶ 0042, Fig. 12). in response to detecting the sequence of one or more user inputs, restricting use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions (personal device 120 may store the electronic key [first secure credential] and the permission settings in memory 240 or database 260, see ¶ 0050; a home screen 400 including “Car Info,” “Control,” “Climate,” and “Keys” options for user selection located at the top of the screen. In the illustration, the home screen also includes the option to edit [sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to a request] an electronic key 402 for one or more registered users and to send a new electronic key 404…electronic keys may also include a time limit for use, and expire after the time limit is up. For example, in the illustration, the electronic key for “David Smith,” has 3 days and 16 hours left before it expires [restrict use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize at least a first function of the one or more functions for a predetermined period of time], see ¶ 0034; Fig. 4; based on user input or user selection to edit electronic key 402 of “David Smith,” one or more editing screens 500 may be displayed for user modification and/or review. In the illustration, permission screen 502 displays touch screen buttons and tabs in order to modify vehicle access permissions for “David Smith.” For example, vehicle permissions including permissions to allow driving, set drive duration, set speed limit, and set drive mode are shown. The user may touch the edit permission button to modify these permissions [in response to detecting the sequence of one or more user inputs, restricting use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions, wherein restricting the use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions prohibits the computer system from providing authorization to use the first function of the one or more functions of the vehicle that is separate from the computer system during the predetermined period of time], see ¶ 0035; Fig. 5; when a user selects “Schedule,” the electronic key application proceeds to the schedule screen 1200. Schedule screen 1200 may include options for always permitting electronic key access, on a recurring basis, or for a temporary time period. Specific days of the week permitting electronic key access may be set, and specific times permitting electronic key access may also be set, see ¶ 0042, Fig. 12); Santiano does not expressly disclose while use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions is restricted, receiving biometric information; and in response to receiving the biometric information: in accordance with a determination that the biometric information satisfies unlocking criteria, restoring use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions and in accordance with a determination that the biometric information does not satisfy unlocking criteria, maintaining restriction of use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions. Sezanayev teaches while use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions is restricted, receiving biometric information (an alcohol level sensor 10 is located not on a vehicle door, but instead on a door key 10. The door key-located sensor 10 senses whether an alcohol level [biometric information] in a potential driver is within an allowable range or outside of the allowable range through touching the door key 10 of fingers and/or hand by the potential driver. Such a sensor can be formed as a known transdermal sensor which can sense an alcohol level in blood of a potential driver through his skin, see ¶ 0038); and in response to receiving the biometric information: in accordance with a determination that the biometric information satisfies unlocking criteria, restoring use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions (If the sensor 4 senses that the alcohol level of the potential drive is absent or within an allowable range, it sends a signal to the door lock 5 and the door lock can open either automatically or by a key, see ¶ 0034; When a potential driver touches the vehicle door key 10, 10', 10'' his alcohol level is sensed and corresponding signals are sent to the door lock 5, see ¶ 0039) and in accordance with a determination that the biometric information does not satisfy unlocking criteria, maintaining restriction of use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions (If however to the contrary the sensor 4 senses an alcohol level in a potential driver which is outside of the allowable range, the sensor sends a signal to the door lock 5 and the door lock 5 cannot open either automatically or by a key, see ¶ 0034; When a potential driver touches the vehicle door key 10, 10', 10'' his alcohol level is sensed and corresponding signals are sent to the door lock 5, see ¶ 0039). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify Santiano with Sezanayev to teach while use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions is restricted, receiving biometric information; and in response to receiving the biometric information: in accordance with a determination that the biometric information satisfies unlocking criteria, restoring use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions and in accordance with a determination that the biometric information does not satisfy unlocking criteria, maintaining restriction of use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions. The suggestion/motivation would have been in order to blocking unlocking of a door/doors of the vehicles and additionally by block operation of the ignition system if the sensor/sensors sense an alcohol level in the potential driver which is outside an allowable range (see ¶ 0024). As to Claim 5, Santiano and Sezanayev depending from Claim 1, Santiano discloses wherein the first function comprises driving the vehicle, and restricting use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions comprises restricting use of the first secure credential to authorize driving of the vehicle (Vehicle data 254 may include vehicle make, model, drive, drivers, speed limit, duration, drive mode, mileage, and/or any vehicle related information associated with vehicle 130, including vehicle permission information, see ¶ 0030; network server 160 may receive authorized user data 252, vehicle data 254, and owner information 256 from network 150 through I/O device 230, and may analyze such data to control and/or restrict vehicle 130 permissions by generating/modifying and sending electronic keys, see ¶ 0032; permission screen 502 displays touch screen buttons and tabs in order to modify vehicle access permissions for “David Smith.” For example, vehicle permissions including permissions to allow driving, set drive duration, set speed limit, and set drive mode are shown, see ¶ 0035). As to Claim 17, Santiano and Sezanayev depending on Claim 1, Sezanayev teaches wherein the biometric information includes a blood alcohol level (an alcohol level sensor 10 is located not on a vehicle door, but instead on a door key 10. The door key-located sensor 10 senses whether an alcohol level [biometric information] in a potential driver is within an allowable range or outside of the allowable range through touching the door key 10 of fingers and/or hand by the potential driver. Such a sensor can be formed as a known transdermal sensor which can sense an alcohol level in blood of a potential driver through his skin, see ¶ 0038). As to Claim 18, Santiano and Sezanayev depending on Claim 1, Sezanayev teaches wherein the biometric information is received from a blood alcohol level test device (an alcohol level sensor 10 [blood alcohol level test device] is located not on a vehicle door, but instead on a door key 10. The door key-located sensor 10 senses whether an alcohol level [biometric information] in a potential driver is within an allowable range or outside of the allowable range through touching the door key 10 of fingers and/or hand by the potential driver. Such a sensor can be formed as a known transdermal sensor which can sense an alcohol level in blood of a potential driver through his skin, see ¶ 0038). As to Claim 19, Santiano and Sezanayev depending on Claim 1, Sezanayev teaches wherein the determination that the biometric information satisfies unlocking criteria includes a determination that the biometric information indicates a blood alcohol level below a threshold value (If the sensor 4 senses that the alcohol level of the potential drive is absent or within an allowable range, it sends a signal to the door lock 5 and the door lock can open either automatically or by a key, see ¶ 0034; When a potential driver touches the vehicle door key 10, 10', 10'' his alcohol level is sensed and corresponding signals are sent to the door lock 5, see ¶ 0039). As to Claim 20, Santiano and Sezanayev depending on Claim 1, Sezanayev teaches wherein the determination that the biometric information does not satisfy unlocking criteria includes a determination that the biometric information indicates a blood alcohol level above a threshold value (If however to the contrary the sensor 4 senses an alcohol level in a potential driver which is outside of the allowable range, the sensor sends a signal to the door lock 5 and the door lock 5 cannot open either automatically or by a key, see ¶ 0034; When a potential driver touches the vehicle door key 10, 10', 10'' his alcohol level is sensed and corresponding signals are sent to the door lock 5, see ¶ 0039). As to Claim 21, Santiano discloses a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing one or more programs configured to be executed by one or more processors of a computer system that is in communication with a display generation component and one or more input devices (The non-transitory computer-readable medium may store instructions executable by one or more processors connected to the cloud network to perform a method. The method may include generating an electronic key for permitting one or more registered users to access and operate a vehicle, and the electronic key may include a plurality of permission settings, see ¶ 0008; System 100 may allow for one or more personal devices 120 to transfer electronic keys and associated with an electronic key application (e.g., illustrated in FIGS. 4-13) over network 150 to cloud platform 190 and/or vehicle 130… Cloud platform 190 may comprise one or more network servers 160, see ¶ 0023-0027; Network server 160 may provide authorized user data 252, vehicle data 254, and owner information 256 for use in an electronic key application (as further described with reference to FIGS. 4-13) that is displayed and executed on a personal device 120 operated by a vehicle owner, see ¶ 0032; The GUI [display generation component] may be displayed as part of a screen on a personal device 120, see ¶ 0034), the one or more programs including instructions for: displaying, via the display generation component, a user interface object corresponding to a first secure credential, wherein the first secure credential is enrolled on the computer system and is configured to provide authorization to use one or more functions of a vehicle (Network server 160 may provide authorized user data 252, vehicle data 254, and owner information 256 for use in an electronic key application (as further described with reference to FIGS. 4-13) that is displayed and executed on a personal device 120 operated by a vehicle owner. Based on user input or user interaction with the GUI, network server 160 may receive authorized user data 252, vehicle data 254, and owner information 256 from network 150 through I/O device 230, and may analyze such data to control and/or restrict vehicle 130 permissions by generating/modifying and sending electronic keys, see ¶ 0032; The GUI may be displayed as part of a screen on a personal device 120, see ¶ 0034; graphical user interfaces (GUIs) showing a permission tab and a history tab of an electronic key for editing. Based on user input or user selection to edit electronic key 402 of “David Smith,” one or more editing screens 500 may be displayed for user modification and/or review. In the illustration, permission screen 502 displays touch screen buttons and tabs in order to modify vehicle access permissions for “David Smith.”, see ¶ 0035, Figs. 4 - 5); while displaying the user interface object corresponding to the first secure credential, detecting, at the computer system, a sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to a request to restrict use of the first secure credential to authorize at least a first function of the one or more functions for a predetermined period of time (personal device 120 may store the electronic key [first secure credential] and the permission settings in memory 240 or database 260, see ¶ 0050; a home screen 400 including “Car Info,” “Control,” “Climate,” and “Keys” options for user selection located at the top of the screen. In the illustration, the home screen also includes the option to edit [sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to a request] an electronic key 402 for one or more registered users and to send a new electronic key 404…electronic keys may also include a time limit for use, and expire after the time limit is up. For example, in the illustration, the electronic key for “David Smith,” has 3 days and 16 hours left before it expires [restrict use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize at least a first function of the one or more functions for a predetermined period of time], see ¶ 0034; Fig. 4; based on user input or user selection to edit electronic key 402 of “David Smith,” one or more editing screens 500 may be displayed for user modification and/or review. In the illustration, permission screen 502 displays touch screen buttons and tabs in order to modify vehicle access permissions for “David Smith.” For example, vehicle permissions including permissions to allow driving, set drive duration, set speed limit, and set drive mode are shown. The user may touch the edit permission button to modify these permissions [in response to detecting the sequence of one or more user inputs, restricting use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions, wherein restricting the use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions prohibits the computer system from providing authorization to use the first function of the one or more functions of the vehicle that is separate from the computer system during the predetermined period of time], see ¶ 0035; Fig. 5; when a user selects “Schedule,” the electronic key application proceeds to the schedule screen 1200. Schedule screen 1200 may include options for always permitting electronic key access, on a recurring basis, or for a temporary time period. Specific days of the week permitting electronic key access may be set, and specific times permitting electronic key access may also be set, see ¶ 0042, Fig. 12). in response to detecting the sequence of one or more user inputs, restricting use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions (personal device 120 may store the electronic key [first secure credential] and the permission settings in memory 240 or database 260, see ¶ 0050; a home screen 400 including “Car Info,” “Control,” “Climate,” and “Keys” options for user selection located at the top of the screen. In the illustration, the home screen also includes the option to edit [sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to a request] an electronic key 402 for one or more registered users and to send a new electronic key 404…electronic keys may also include a time limit for use, and expire after the time limit is up. For example, in the illustration, the electronic key for “David Smith,” has 3 days and 16 hours left before it expires [restrict use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize at least a first function of the one or more functions for a predetermined period of time], see ¶ 0034; Fig. 4; based on user input or user selection to edit electronic key 402 of “David Smith,” one or more editing screens 500 may be displayed for user modification and/or review. In the illustration, permission screen 502 displays touch screen buttons and tabs in order to modify vehicle access permissions for “David Smith.” For example, vehicle permissions including permissions to allow driving, set drive duration, set speed limit, and set drive mode are shown. The user may touch the edit permission button to modify these permissions [in response to detecting the sequence of one or more user inputs, restricting use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions, wherein restricting the use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions prohibits the computer system from providing authorization to use the first function of the one or more functions of the vehicle that is separate from the computer system during the predetermined period of time], see ¶ 0035; Fig. 5; when a user selects “Schedule,” the electronic key application proceeds to the schedule screen 1200. Schedule screen 1200 may include options for always permitting electronic key access, on a recurring basis, or for a temporary time period. Specific days of the week permitting electronic key access may be set, and specific times permitting electronic key access may also be set, see ¶ 0042, Fig. 12). Santiano does not expressly disclose while use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions is restricted, receiving biometric information; and in response to receiving the biometric information: in accordance with a determination that the biometric information satisfies unlocking criteria, restoring use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions and in accordance with a determination that the biometric information does not satisfy unlocking criteria, maintaining restriction of use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions. Sezanayev teaches while use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions is restricted, receiving biometric information (an alcohol level sensor 10 is located not on a vehicle door, but instead on a door key 10. The door key-located sensor 10 senses whether an alcohol level [biometric information] in a potential driver is within an allowable range or outside of the allowable range through touching the door key 10 of fingers and/or hand by the potential driver. Such a sensor can be formed as a known transdermal sensor which can sense an alcohol level in blood of a potential driver through his skin, see ¶ 0038); and in response to receiving the biometric information: in accordance with a determination that the biometric information satisfies unlocking criteria, restoring use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions (If the sensor 4 senses that the alcohol level of the potential drive is absent or within an allowable range, it sends a signal to the door lock 5 and the door lock can open either automatically or by a key, see ¶ 0034; When a potential driver touches the vehicle door key 10, 10', 10'' his alcohol level is sensed and corresponding signals are sent to the door lock 5, see ¶ 0039) and in accordance with a determination that the biometric information does not satisfy unlocking criteria, maintaining restriction of use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions (If however to the contrary the sensor 4 senses an alcohol level in a potential driver which is outside of the allowable range, the sensor sends a signal to the door lock 5 and the door lock 5 cannot open either automatically or by a key, see ¶ 0034; When a potential driver touches the vehicle door key 10, 10', 10'' his alcohol level is sensed and corresponding signals are sent to the door lock 5, see ¶ 0039). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify Santiano with Sezanayev to teach while use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions is restricted, receiving biometric information; and in response to receiving the biometric information: in accordance with a determination that the biometric information satisfies unlocking criteria, restoring use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions and in accordance with a determination that the biometric information does not satisfy unlocking criteria, maintaining restriction of use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions. The suggestion/motivation would have been in order to blocking unlocking of a door/doors of the vehicles and additionally by block operation of the ignition system if the sensor/sensors sense an alcohol level in the potential driver which is outside an allowable range (see ¶ 0024). As to Claim 22, Santiano discloses a method, comprising: at a computer system that is in communication with a display generation component and one or more input devices: displaying, via the display generation component, a user interface object corresponding to a first secure credential, wherein the first secure credential is enrolled on the computer system and is configured to provide authorization to use one or more functions of a vehicle (Network server 160 may provide authorized user data 252, vehicle data 254, and owner information 256 for use in an electronic key application (as further described with reference to FIGS. 4-13) that is displayed and executed on a personal device 120 operated by a vehicle owner. Based on user input or user interaction with the GUI, network server 160 may receive authorized user data 252, vehicle data 254, and owner information 256 from network 150 through I/O device 230, and may analyze such data to control and/or restrict vehicle 130 permissions by generating/modifying and sending electronic keys, see ¶ 0032; The GUI may be displayed as part of a screen on a personal device 120, see ¶ 0034; graphical user interfaces (GUIs) showing a permission tab and a history tab of an electronic key for editing. Based on user input or user selection to edit electronic key 402 of “David Smith,” one or more editing screens 500 may be displayed for user modification and/or review. In the illustration, permission screen 502 displays touch screen buttons and tabs in order to modify vehicle access permissions for “David Smith.”, see ¶ 0035, Figs. 4 - 5); while displaying the user interface object corresponding to the first secure credential, detecting, at the computer system, a sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to a request to restrict use of the first secure credential to authorize at least a first function of the one or more functions for a predetermined period of time (personal device 120 may store the electronic key [first secure credential] and the permission settings in memory 240 or database 260, see ¶ 0050; a home screen 400 including “Car Info,” “Control,” “Climate,” and “Keys” options for user selection located at the top of the screen. In the illustration, the home screen also includes the option to edit [sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to a request] an electronic key 402 for one or more registered users and to send a new electronic key 404…electronic keys may also include a time limit for use, and expire after the time limit is up. For example, in the illustration, the electronic key for “David Smith,” has 3 days and 16 hours left before it expires [restrict use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize at least a first function of the one or more functions for a predetermined period of time], see ¶ 0034; Fig. 4; based on user input or user selection to edit electronic key 402 of “David Smith,” one or more editing screens 500 may be displayed for user modification and/or review. In the illustration, permission screen 502 displays touch screen buttons and tabs in order to modify vehicle access permissions for “David Smith.” For example, vehicle permissions including permissions to allow driving, set drive duration, set speed limit, and set drive mode are shown. The user may touch the edit permission button to modify these permissions [in response to detecting the sequence of one or more user inputs, restricting use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions, wherein restricting the use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions prohibits the computer system from providing authorization to use the first function of the one or more functions of the vehicle that is separate from the computer system during the predetermined period of time], see ¶ 0035; Fig. 5; when a user selects “Schedule,” the electronic key application proceeds to the schedule screen 1200. Schedule screen 1200 may include options for always permitting electronic key access, on a recurring basis, or for a temporary time period. Specific days of the week permitting electronic key access may be set, and specific times permitting electronic key access may also be set, see ¶ 0042, Fig. 12). in response to detecting the sequence of one or more user inputs, restricting use of the first secure credential enrolled on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions (personal device 120 may store the electronic key [first secure credential] and the permission settings in memory 240 or database 260, see ¶ 0050; a home screen 400 including “Car Info,” “Control,” “Climate,” and “Keys” options for user selection located at the top of the screen. In the illustration, the home screen also includes the option to edit [sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to a request] an electronic key 402 for one or more registered users and to send a new electronic key 404…electronic keys may also include a time limit for use, and expire after the time limit is up. For example, in the illustration, the electronic key for “David Smith,” has 3 days and 16 hours left before it expires [restrict use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize at least a first function of the one or more functions for a predetermined period of time], see ¶ 0034; Fig. 4; based on user input or user selection to edit electronic key 402 of “David Smith,” one or more editing screens 500 may be displayed for user modification and/or review. In the illustration, permission screen 502 displays touch screen buttons and tabs in order to modify vehicle access permissions for “David Smith.” For example, vehicle permissions including permissions to allow driving, set drive duration, set speed limit, and set drive mode are shown. The user may touch the edit permission button to modify these permissions [in response to detecting the sequence of one or more user inputs, restricting use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions, wherein restricting the use of the first secure credential stored on the computer system to authorize the first function of the one or more functions prohibits the computer system from providing authorization to use the first function of the one or more functions of the vehicle that is separate from the computer system during the predetermined period of time], see ¶ 0035; Fig. 5; when a user selects “Schedule,” the electronic key application proceeds to the schedule screen 1200. Schedule screen 1200 may include options for always permitting electronic key access, on a recurring basis, or for a temporary time period. Specific days of the week permitting electronic key access may be set, and specific times permitting electronic key access may also be set, see ¶ 0042, Fig. 12). Santiano does not expressly disclose while use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions is restricted, receiving biometric information; and in response to receiving the biometric information: in accordance with a determination that the biometric information satisfies unlocking criteria, restoring use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions and in accordance with a determination that the biometric information does not satisfy unlocking criteria, maintaining restriction of use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions. Sezanayev teaches while use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions is restricted, receiving biometric information (an alcohol level sensor 10 is located not on a vehicle door, but instead on a door key 10. The door key-located sensor 10 senses whether an alcohol level [biometric information] in a potential driver is within an allowable range or outside of the allowable range through touching the door key 10 of fingers and/or hand by the potential driver. Such a sensor can be formed as a known transdermal sensor which can sense an alcohol level in blood of a potential driver through his skin, see ¶ 0038); and in response to receiving the biometric information: in accordance with a determination that the biometric information satisfies unlocking criteria, restoring use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions (If the sensor 4 senses that the alcohol level of the potential drive is absent or within an allowable range, it sends a signal to the door lock 5 and the door lock can open either automatically or by a key, see ¶ 0034; When a potential driver touches the vehicle door key 10, 10', 10'' his alcohol level is sensed and corresponding signals are sent to the door lock 5, see ¶ 0039) and in accordance with a determination that the biometric information does not satisfy unlocking criteria, maintaining restriction of use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions (If however to the contrary the sensor 4 senses an alcohol level in a potential driver which is outside of the allowable range, the sensor sends a signal to the door lock 5 and the door lock 5 cannot open either automatically or by a key, see ¶ 0034; When a potential driver touches the vehicle door key 10, 10', 10'' his alcohol level is sensed and corresponding signals are sent to the door lock 5, see ¶ 0039). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify Santiano with Sezanayev to teach while use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions is restricted, receiving biometric information; and in response to receiving the biometric information: in accordance with a determination that the biometric information satisfies unlocking criteria, restoring use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions and in accordance with a determination that the biometric information does not satisfy unlocking criteria, maintaining restriction of use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions. The suggestion/motivation would have been in order to blocking unlocking of a door/doors of the vehicles and additionally by block operation of the ignition system if the sensor/sensors sense an alcohol level in the potential driver which is outside an allowable range (see ¶ 0024). Claim(s) 2-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Publication 2018/0186333 to Santiano et al (“Santiano”) in further view of U.S. Patent Publication 2013/0285816 to Sezanayev in further view of U.S. Patent Publication 2017/0120864 to Fischer et al (“Fischer”). As to Claim 2, Santiano and Sezanayev depending from Claim 1, Santiano and Sezanayev do not expressly disclose wherein the one or more programs further include instructions for: after restricting use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions, in accordance with a determination that the predetermined period of time has elapsed after restricting use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions, restoring use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions. Fischer discloses wherein the one or more programs further include instructions for: after restricting use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions, in accordance with a determination that the predetermined period of time has elapsed after restricting use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions, restoring use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions (More specifically, if the mobile device has a restriction that does not allow the occupant to drive the vehicle at a predefined time, the ignition system may be enabled if the current time is outside the window of the restricted predefined time, see ¶ 0072). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been in order to modify Santiano and Sezanayev with Fischer to teach wherein the one or more programs further include instructions for: after restricting use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions, in accordance with a determination that the predetermined period of time has elapsed after restricting use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions, restoring use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions. The suggestion/motivation would have been in order to enable the ignition system if the current time is outside the window of the restricted predefined time (see ¶ 0072). As to Claim 3, Santiano and Sezanayev depending from Claim 1, Santiano and Sezanayev do not expressly disclose wherein the one or more programs further include instructions for: detecting a request to use the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions; and72116548721Attorney Docket No.: P51335US1/77770000577101 in response to detecting the request to use the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions: in accordance with a determination that use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions is not currently restricted, authorizing the first function of the one or more functions, and in accordance with a determination that use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions is currently restricted, forgoing authorizing. Fischer discloses wherein the one or more programs further include instructions for: detecting a request to use the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions (The processor is further programmed to receive input at the user interface to associate the device with a pre-approval setting for enabling a vehicle start request when the device having the pre-approval setting and a vehicle key are detected by the processor, see ¶ 0004; the VCS 1 may allow one or more restriction settings to be associated with the one or more mobile devices via the user interface display 4, see ¶ 0026; The VCS 1 may output the driver authorization settings 308 to the display 4 based on a request to configure the driver authorization system via the occupants input...The driver authorization configuration 308 may request a password [first secure credential] before outputting the one or more selectable entries 304, see ¶ 0058) and72 116548721Attorney Docket No.: P51335US1/77770000577101 in response to detecting the request to use the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions: in accordance with a determination that use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions is not currently restricted, authorizing the first function of the one or more functions, and in accordance with a determination that use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions is currently restricted, forgoing authorizing (In operation 424, in response to the mobile device 53 recognized as a previously paired mobile device having no restrictions, the VCS 1 may enable the ignition system allowing for a vehicle drive-away event. In one example, the previously paired mobile device may have a restriction, however, the ignition system may be enabled if the restriction is within a predefined threshold. More specifically, if the mobile device has a restriction that does not allow the occupant to drive the vehicle at a predefined time, the ignition system may be enabled if the current time is outside the window of the restricted predefined time, see ¶ 0072). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been in order to modify Santiano and Sezanayev with Fischer to teach wherein the one or more programs further include instructions for: detecting a request to use the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions; and72116548721Attorney Docket No.: P51335US1/77770000577101 in response to detecting the request to use the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions: in accordance with a determination that use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions is not currently restricted, authorizing the first function of the one or more functions, and in accordance with a determination that use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions is currently restricted, forgoing authorizing. The suggestion/motivation would have been in order to associate the device with a pre-approval setting for enabling a vehicle start request when the device having the pre-approval setting and a vehicle key are detected by the processor (see Abstract). As to Claim 4, Santiano and Sezanayev depending from Claim 1, Santiano and Sezanayev do not expressly disclose wherein the one or more programs further include instructions for: after restricting use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions: detecting a request to use the first secure credential to authorize a respective operation of the vehicle; and in response to detecting the request to use the secure credential to authorize the respective operation: in accordance with a determination that the respective operation corresponds to the first function, forgoing authorizing the respective operation, and in accordance with a determination that the respective operation corresponds to a second function different from the first function, authorizing the respective operation. Fischer discloses wherein the one or more programs further include instructions for: after restricting use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions: detecting a request to use the first secure credential to authorize a respective operation of the vehicle (The processor is further programmed to receive input at the user interface to associate the device with a pre-approval setting for enabling a vehicle start request [respective operation] when the device having the pre-approval setting and a vehicle key are detected by the processor, see ¶ 0004; the VCS 1 may allow one or more restriction settings to be associated with the one or more mobile devices via the user interface display 4, see ¶ 0026; The VCS 1 may output the driver authorization settings 308 to the display 4 based on a request to configure the driver authorization system via the occupants input...The driver authorization configuration 308 may request a password [first secure credential] before outputting the one or more selectable entries 304, see ¶ 0058); and in response to detecting the request to use the secure credential to authorize the respective operation: in accordance with a determination that the respective operation corresponds to the first function, forgoing authorizing the respective operation (The VCS 1 may output the driver authorization settings 308 to the display 4 based on a request to configure the driver authorization system via the occupants input...The driver authorization configuration 308 may request a password [first secure credential] before outputting the one or more selectable entries 304. The password may include, but is not limited to, a predefined numerical password, a voice password, an alphanumeric password, and/or a question and answer password process. In response to the password being correct, the VCS 1 may output the one or more selectable entries 304. If the password is incorrect, the VCS 1 may not allow access to the one or more selectable entries 304, see ¶ 0058; The selectable list entries 304 may include, but are not limited to, an entry 304-A for pairing a mobile device, an entry 304-B for configuring restrictions for a mobile device, an entry 304-C for sending a temporary disable request [forgoing authorizing a vehicle start, e.g. respective operation], see ¶ 0060), and in accordance with a determination that the respective operation corresponds to a second function different from the first function, authorizing the respective operation (the VCS 1 may prevent a powertrain start request until the system recognizes both the vehicle key and a previously paired mobile device [second function], see ¶ 0026; The VCS 1 may output the driver authorization settings 308 to the display 4 based on a request to configure the driver authorization system via the occupants input...The driver authorization configuration 308 may request a password [first secure credential] before outputting the one or more selectable entries 304. The password may include, but is not limited to, a predefined numerical password, a voice password, an alphanumeric password, and/or a question and answer password process. In response to the password being correct, the VCS 1 may output the one or more selectable entries 304. If the password is incorrect, the VCS 1 may not allow access to the one or more selectable entries 304, see ¶ 0058; The selectable list entries 304 may include, but are not limited to, an entry 304-A for pairing a mobile device [second function], an entry 304-B for configuring restrictions for a mobile device, an entry 304-C for sending a temporary disable request [forgoing authorizing a vehicle start, e.g. respective operation], see ¶ 0060). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been in order to modify Santiano and Sezanayev with Fischer to teach wherein the one or more programs further include instructions for: after restricting use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions: detecting a request to use the first secure credential to authorize a respective operation of the vehicle; and in response to detecting the request to use the secure credential to authorize the respective operation: in accordance with a determination that the respective operation corresponds to the first function, forgoing authorizing the respective operation, and in accordance with a determination that the respective operation corresponds to a second function different from the first function, authorizing the respective operation. The suggestion/motivation would have been in order to associate the device with a pre-approval setting for enabling a vehicle start request when the device having the pre-approval setting and a vehicle key are detected by the processor (see Abstract). Claim(s) 6, 9, 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Publication 2018/0186333 to Santiano et al (“Santiano”) in view of U.S. Patent Publication 2013/0285816 to Sezanayev in further view of U.S. Patent Publication 2018/0029560 to Mohaupt et al (“Mohaupt”). As to Claim 6, Santiano and Sezanayev depending from Claim 5, Santiano and Sezanayev do not expressly disclose wherein the one or more programs further include instructions for: after restricting use of the first secure credential to authorize driving of the vehicle: 73 116548721Attorney Docket No.: P51335US1/77770000577101detecting an attempt to use the first secure credential to perform a second respective operation of the vehicle; and in response to detecting the attempt to use the secure credential to perform the second respective operation: in accordance with a determination that the second respective operation corresponds to driving of the vehicle, forgoing authorizing the second respective operation, and in accordance with a determination that the second respective operation does not correspond to driving of the vehicle, authorizing performance of the second respective operation. Mohaupt teaches the one or more programs further include instructions for: after restricting use of the first secure credential to authorize driving of the vehicle: 73 116548721Attorney Docket No.: P51335US1/77770000577101detecting an attempt to use the first secure credential to perform a second respective operation of the vehicle (checking a further authorization of the mobile communication device for unlocking or locking the vehicle, based on the position of the mobile communication device and based on the digital key value. The checking of the authorization for unlocking or locking the vehicle [second respective operation] can acknowledge an authorization, to unlock the vehicle and/or lock the vehicle, see ¶ 0019); and in response to detecting the attempt to use the secure credential to perform the second respective operation: in accordance with a determination that the second respective operation corresponds to driving of the vehicle, forgoing authorizing the second respective operation (checking of the authorization to operate the vehicle engine can acknowledge an authorization, to start the vehicle engine and/or operate the vehicle engine during the journey, if the determining of the position of the mobile communication device determines a position of the mobile communication device inside the vehicle and the received key value is valid, see ¶ 0018), and in accordance with a determination that the second respective operation does not correspond to driving of the vehicle, authorizing performance of the second respective operation (checking a further authorization of the mobile communication device for unlocking or locking the vehicle, based on the position of the mobile communication device and based on the digital key value. The checking of the authorization for unlocking or locking the vehicle can acknowledge an authorization, to unlock the vehicle and/or lock the vehicle, if the determining of the position of the mobile communication device determines a position of the mobile communication device outside the vehicle (and in proximity to the vehicle, for example), and the received key value is valid, see ¶ 0019). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify Santiano and Sezanayev with Mohaupt to teach after restricting use of the first secure credential to authorize driving of the vehicle: 73 116548721Attorney Docket No.: P51335US1/77770000577101detecting an attempt to use the first secure credential to perform a second respective operation of the vehicle; and in response to detecting the attempt to use the secure credential to perform the second respective operation: in accordance with a determination that the second respective operation corresponds to driving of the vehicle, forgoing authorizing the second respective operation, and in accordance with a determination that the second respective operation does not correspond to driving of the vehicle, authorizing performance of the second respective operation. The suggestion/motivation would have been in order to prevent unauthorized entry to a vehicle (see ¶ 0008). As to Claim 9, Santiano and Sezanayev depending from Claim 1, Santiano teaches wherein selection of the contactable user requests permission from the contactable user to restore use of the first secure credential (touch screen buttons for the electronic keys of authorized users “Jane Doe” and “David Smith” include an option to edit 402. A touch screen button to send a new electronic key 404, perhaps to a user not shown, see ¶ 0034; graphical user interfaces (GUIs) showing a permission tab and a history tab of an electronic key for editing Based on user input or user selection to edit electronic key 402 of “David Smith,” one or more editing screens 500 may be displayed for user modification and/or review... permission screen 502 displays touch screen buttons and tabs in order to modify vehicle access permissions for “David Smith” [second sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to a selection of the contactable user]. For example, vehicle permissions including permissions to allow driving, set drive duration, set speed limit, and set drive mode are shown, see ¶ 0035-0036); Santiano and Sezanayev do not expressly disclose first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions when proximity criteria are satisfied. Mohaupt teaches first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions when proximity criteria are satisfied (checking of the authorization to operate the vehicle engine can acknowledge an authorization, to start the vehicle engine and/or operate the vehicle engine during the journey, if the determining of the position of the mobile communication device determines a position of the mobile communication device inside the vehicle and the received key value is valid, see ¶ 0018). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify Santiano and Sezanayev with Mohaupt to teach first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions when proximity criteria are satisfied. The suggestion/motivation would have been in order to check the authorization of the mobile communication device for operating the vehicle engine, based on the position of the mobile communication device and based on the digital key value (see Abstract). As to Claim 17, Santiano and Sezanayev depending from Claim 1, Santiano and Sezanayev do not expressly disclose the one or more programs further include instructions for: after restricting use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions, detecting a fourth sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to a request to restore use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions; and in response to receiving the fourth sequence of one or more user inputs: in accordance with a determination that the fourth sequence of one or more user inputs satisfies unlocking criteria, restoring use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions; and in accordance with a determination that the fourth sequence of one or more user inputs do not satisfy unlocking criteria, maintaining restriction of use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions. Mohaupt discloses wherein the one or more programs further include instructions for: after restricting use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions, detecting a fourth sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to a request to restore use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions (obtaining information about a biometric authentication (for example, by means of a fingerprint, facial feature analysis or voice analysis) of a user of the mobile communication device. The checking of the authorization of the mobile communication device for operating the vehicle engine can further be based on the information about the biometric authentication, see ¶ 0021; The biometric authentication can be based, by way of example, on unlocking the mobile communication device 200 for the purpose of using the communication device or on biometric authentication for the purpose of obtaining authorization for operating the vehicle engine, see ¶ 0066); and in response to receiving the fourth sequence of one or more user inputs: in accordance with a determination that the fourth sequence of one or more user inputs satisfies unlocking criteria, restoring use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions (The checking 130 of the authorization of the mobile communication device 200 for operating the vehicle engine (and/or the checking of the further authorization) may further be based on the information about the biometric authentication, see ¶ 0066; checking a further authorization of the mobile communication device for unlocking or locking the vehicle, based on the position of the mobile communication device and based on the digital key value, see ¶ 0019); and in accordance with a determination that the fourth sequence of one or more user inputs do not satisfy unlocking criteria, maintaining restriction of use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions (The checking 130 of the authorization of the mobile communication device 200 for operating the vehicle engine (and/or the checking of the further authorization) may further be based on the information about the biometric authentication, see ¶ 0066; checking a further authorization of the mobile communication device for unlocking or locking the vehicle, based on the position of the mobile communication device and based on the digital key value, see ¶ 0019). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify Santiano and Sezanayev with Mohaupt to teach the one or more programs further include instructions for: after restricting use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions, detecting a fourth sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to a request to restore use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions; and in response to receiving the fourth sequence of one or more user inputs: in accordance with a determination that the fourth sequence of one or more user inputs satisfies unlocking criteria, restoring use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions; and in accordance with a determination that the fourth sequence of one or more user inputs do not satisfy unlocking criteria, maintaining restriction of use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions. The suggestion/motivation would have been in order to prevent unauthorized entry to a vehicle (see ¶ 0008). Claim(s) 7, 8, 10, 11, 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Publication 2018/0186333 to Santiano et al (“Santiano”) in further view of U.S. Patent Publication 2013/0285816 to Sezanayev in further view of Japanese Patent Publication 2019/046122 to Tsubouchi et al (“Tsubouchi”) (relied upon English Translation). As to Claim 7, Santiano and Sezanayev depending from Claim 1, Santiano teaches detecting a second sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to selection of a contactable user from a plurality of contactable users (touch screen buttons for the electronic keys of authorized users “Jane Doe” and “David Smith” include an option to edit 402. A touch screen button to send a new electronic key 404, perhaps to a user not shown, see ¶ 0034; at step 1304, process 1300 may include providing the electronic key to the one or more registered users [contactable user] through the cloud network. Upon selection of authorized users and setting of permissions, the vehicle owner may send a new key (as described with reference to FIGS. 6 and 11). System 100 may allow for one or more personal devices 120 to transfer electronic keys associated with an electronic key application over network 150 to cloud platform 190 and/or vehicle 130, see ¶ 0045). Santiano does not expressly disclose wherein selection of the contactable user enables the contactable user to restore use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions. However, Santiano teaches personal device 120 may store the electronic key [first secure credential] and the permission settings in memory 240 or database 260 (see ¶ 0050). One or more “send” screens 700 may be displayed. In the illustration, screen 702 displays a pop-up box when a user selects the “send invite” button [second sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to selection of a contactable user from a plurality of contactable users]. The pop-up or dialog box provides a notification message to the user to confirm that a new electronic key may be sent to an authorized user (see ¶ 0037, Fig. 7); the updated key [secure credential] may be sent to personal device 120 of the registered user and/or vehicle 130 to replace the existing key on that device. The modified permissions may also be provided in the form of an alert or message sent to the vehicle operator, notifying of a change in permissions. Any user who has access to the electronic key application may send or access a key request to a vehicle owner by specifying desired customizations. An owner can edit pre-customized key request and send back or provide the electronic key with the modified permission settings to one or more registered users (see ¶ 0049) but does not expressly disclose restoring the use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions. Tsubouchi teaches “authorized user U10” and “other user U20” refer to the other user terminal 50 used by authorized user U10 and other user U20…the other user terminal 50 installs an application for accessing the access control device 1 and executes the application (see ¶ 0029); access control unit 36 sets access restrictions for restricting accesses of other users U20…when the detection unit 32 detects the occurrence of an emergency, the access control unit 36 permits access of the user U20…thereby canceling the access restriction (see ¶ 0065-0066). Examiner broadly construes that Tsubouchi’s second external device, other user terminal 50, having Santiano’s key application installed is capable of canceling an access restriction set on its device. Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify Santiano and Sezanayev with Tsubouchi to teach wherein selection of the contactable user enables the contactable user to restore use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions. The suggestion/motivation would have been in order to reliably transmit information in an emergency while protecting privacy in normal times (see ¶ 0005). As to Claim 8, Santiano, Sezanayev and Tsubouchi depending from Claim 7, Santiano teaches wherein selection of the contactable user requests permission from the contactable user to restore use of the first secure credential to authorize the first function of the one or more functions from a remote location (a system for remotely granting vehicle permissions over a cloud network. The system may include one or more processors connected to the cloud network. The one or more processors may generate an electronic key for permitting one or more registered users to access and operate a vehicle, and the electronic key may include a plurality of permission settings, see ¶ 0006; vehicle 130 may include a vehicle controller 360 capable of communicating with a transceiver 310 and personal device 120 executing an electronic key application through network 150. Transceiver 310 may be capable of receiving one or more vehicle permission instructions (further described with reference to FIGS. 4-13) from one or more personal devices 120 and/or cloud platform 190 over network 150. Transceiver 310 may be capable of transmitting authorized user data 352 from vehicle 130 to one or more personal devices 120 and/or cloud platform 190 over network 150... Controller 360 may be configured to receive vehicle owner instructions to control, send, and/or edit electronic key permissions. The vehicle owner may modify or edit electronic keys according to requests from one or more registered users 370, see ¶ 0033; touch screen buttons for the electronic keys of authorized users “Jane Doe” and “David Smith” include an option to edit 402. A touch screen button to send a new electronic key 404, perhaps to a user not shown, see ¶ 0034; graphical user interfaces (GUIs) showing a permission tab and a history tab of an electronic key for editing Based on user input or user selection to edit electronic key 402 of “David Smith,” one or more editing screens 500 may be displayed for user modification and/or review... permission screen 502 displays touch screen buttons and tabs in order to modify vehicle access permissions for “David Smith”, see ¶ 0035-0036). As to Claim 10, Santiano, Sezanayev and Tsubouchi depending from Claim 7, Santiano teaches wherein the plurality of contactable users includes a first set of contactable users that have a predetermined relationship to a user of the computer system and a second set of contactable users that do not have the predetermined relationship to the user of the computer system and wherein the contactable user is user within the first set of contactable users (Screen 800 lists a “Master Key” for use by the owner, a “For Jane” key for use by “Jane Doe,” a “Don't Crash My Car!” key for “John Doe” and “Jane Doe,” and an “Asleep or drunk” key. In the illustration, electronic keys may be assigned to individual users, groups of users, or not assigned to any users. Electronic keys may also be assigned based on a particular category or scenario, and may be titled accordingly, see ¶ 0038). As to Claim 11, Santiano and Tsubouchi depending from Claim 7, Santiano wherein the one or more programs further include instructions for: in response to detecting the second sequence of one or more user inputs corresponding to selection of the contactable user from the plurality of contactable users, initiating a process for transmitting a second secure credential to an electronic device associated with the contactable user wherein the second secure credential is configured to provide authorization to use at least a subset of the one or more functions of the vehicle that includes the first function of the one or more functions (A touch screen button to send a new electronic key 404 [second secure credential], perhaps to a user not shown, see ¶ 0034; Based on user input or user selection to send a new electronic key 404, one or more “send a new key” screens 600 may be displayed for user modification and/or review. In the illustration, duration, drive, and parental controls may be set, see ¶ 0036). As to Claim 14, Santiano and Tsubouchi depending from Claim 7, Santiano wherein the plurality of contactable users includes one or more previously-identified emergency contacts, and the one or more programs further include instructions for: prior to detecting the second sequence of one or more inputs, displaying a suggestion to select at least one of the one or more previously-identified emergency contacts as the contactable user (a home screen 400 including “Car Info,” “Control,” “Climate,” and “Keys” options for user selection located at the top of the screen. In the illustration, the home screen also includes the option to edit an electronic key 402 for one or more registered users and to send a new electronic key 404. In FIG. 4, electronic keys visible for selection are “John Doe,” “Jane Doe,” and “David Smith.” A touch screen button for the electronic key of “John Doe,” the owner of the vehicle, does not include an option to edit. However, touch screen buttons for the electronic keys of authorized users “Jane Doe” and “David Smith” include an option to edit 402, see ¶ 0034). Allowable Subject Matter 11. Claims 12-13, 15, objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EBONI N GILES whose telephone number is (571)270-7453. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9 am - 6 pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, PATRICK EDOUARD can be reached at (571)272-7603. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EBONI N GILES/Examiner, Art Unit 2622 /PATRICK N EDOUARD/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 08, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676953
DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A PARASITIC RESISTANCE IN VIDEO ENDOSCOPES
4y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12657412
WIRELESS ANCHORS FOR ASSET TRACKING
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12602962
CONTACTLESS OPTICAL INTERNET OF THINGS USER IDENTIFICATION DEVICE AND SYSTEM
4y 7m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599835
WEARABLE CONTROLLER
3y 6m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596895
LOW POWER BEACON SCHEDULING
3y 11m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
72%
With Interview (+8.2%)
3y 4m (~2y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 704 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month