Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 16, 2026
Application No. 19/203,355

INK CONTAINER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 09, 2025
Priority
May 21, 2024 — JP 2024-082511
Examiner
UHLENHAKE, JASON S
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1051 granted / 1203 resolved
+19.4% vs TC avg
Minimal -2% lift
Without
With
+-2.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1244
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
54.5%
+14.5% vs TC avg
§102
33.7%
-6.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1203 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim(s) 1-4, 7-11, 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hida (JP 2007055139) in view of Miyaguchi (U.S. Pub. 2016/0002419) Regarding claim 1, Hida discloses an ink container accommodating ink to be supplied to an ink jet printing apparatus (Abstract, Paragraphs 0001-0002), the ink container comprising: An ink accommodating unit formed of a plurality of layers and configured to accommodate the ink (Figures 1-2; Paragraphs 0018-0023) An ink supply unit (Figure 1) configured to supply the ink in the ink accommodating unit to an outside of the ink accommodating unit (Figure 1; Paragraphs 0024-0025) Miyaguchi discloses it is known in the art to use recycled materials for bags containing liquids (Paragraph 0001, 0103-0105) It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Miyaguchi into the device of Hida, for the purpose of preventing bag breakage at the time of transportation and storage Regarding claim 2, the ink supply unit is formed of a plurality of layers, and at least one layer not in contact with the ink among the plurality of layers (Figures 1-2; Paragraphs 0019, 0021, 0023) Miyaguchi discloses it is known in the art to use recycled materials for bags containing liquids (Paragraph 0001, 0103-0105) It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Miyaguchi into the device of Hida, for the purpose of preventing bag breakage at the time of transportation and storage Regarding claim 3, Hida discloses the layers of the ink accommodating unit comprise an outer layer (6), an intermediate layer (9), and an inner layer (7), the intermediate layer is between the outer layer and the inner layer (Figures 1-2; Paragraphs 0019, 0021, 0023) Miyaguchi discloses it is known in the art to use recycled materials for bags containing liquids (Paragraph 0001, 0103-0105) It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Miyaguchi into the intermediate layer and device of Hida, for the purpose of preventing bag breakage at the time of transportation and storage Regarding claim 4, Hida discloses the layers of the ink accommodating unit comprise an outer layer (6), an intermediate layer (9), and an inner layer (7), the intermediate layer is between the outer layer and the inner layer (Figures 1-2; Paragraphs 0019, 0021, 0023) Miyaguchi discloses it is known in the art to use recycled materials for bags containing liquids (Paragraph 0001, 0103-0105) It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Miyaguchi into the outer layer and device of Hida, for the purpose of preventing bag breakage at the time of transportation and storage Regarding claim 7, the intermediate layer is formed of a plurality of layers (Paragraph 0022) Miyaguchi discloses it is known in the art to use recycled materials for bags containing liquids (Paragraph 0001, 0103-0105) It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Miyaguchi into the outer layer and device of Hida, for the purpose of preventing bag breakage at the time of transportation and storage Regarding claim 8, wherein the plurality of layers of the intermediate layer are at least one selected from the group consisting of a polyethylene terephthalate layer, a printing layer (ink receiving layer), a silica depositing layer, a nylon layer, a polyethylene layer, and an EVOH (ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer resin) layer (Paragraphs 0021-0023) Regarding claim 9, the ink supply unit comprises a protective layer (7) on a surface which is to contact the ink (Paragraphs 0019, 0021) Regarding claim 10, wherein the protective layer includes silicone (Paragraphs 0019, 0021; any material used as a base material for bags can be used) Regarding claim 11, wherein the protective layer includes an organo-modified silicone (Paragraphs 0019, 0021; any material used as a base material for bags can be used) Regarding claim 13, wherein the ink container is a pillow type ink pack or a gusseted type ink pack (Figure 1) Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hida (JP 2007055139) as modified by Miyaguchi (U.S. Pub. 2016/0002419) and further in view of Jones et al (U.S. Pub. 2022/0024191) Regarding claim 12, It is known in the art for recycled material to have a higher haze value when compared to non-recycled material. Jones discloses recycled material (Films 2 and 3) with a higher haze value compared with non-recycled material (Film 1) (Table 1; Paragraph 0054) It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate recycled material into the device of Hida as modified by Miyaguchi, for the purpose of reducing environmental costs due to packaging material Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The primary reason for the indication of allowable subject matter of claims 5-6 is the inclusion of the limitation of the inner layer includes the recycled plastic material; and the inner layer has a protective layer on a surface which is to contact the ink; and the protective layer is a virgin material which is identical to a virgin material of the inner layer. It is this limitation found in each of the claims, as it is claimed in the combination, that has not been found, taught or suggested by the prior art of record which makes these claims allowable over the prior art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON S UHLENHAKE whose telephone number is (571)272-5916. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Douglas X. Rodriguez can be reached at (571) 431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON S UHLENHAKE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853 September 29, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12759324
PRINTING APPARATUS
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759295
INKJET PRINTING APPARATUS
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759296
LIQUID DISCHARGE MODULE, LIQUID DISCHARGE HEAD, AND LIQUID DISCHARGE APPARATUS
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759314
PRINTING DEVICE FOR INDIVIDUALLY PRINTING WEBS OR SHEETS OF PRINTING SUBSTRATES
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759311
Test Pattern for Detecting an Impaired Nozzle With Transverse Offset
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (-2.3%)
2y 2m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1203 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month