Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/203,554

REMOTE CREATION OF VIRTUAL CREDENTIAL BOUND TO PHYSICAL LOCATION

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
May 09, 2025
Priority
Sep 14, 2022 — continuation of 12/299,090
Examiner
HENDERSON, ESTHER BENOIT
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Capital One Services LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
546 granted / 690 resolved
+19.1% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
704
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
§103
43.6%
+3.6% vs TC avg
§102
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 690 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This action is in response to an application filed May 9, 2025. Claims 1-20 are pending in this application. Double Patenting The nonstatutory obviousness double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of patent no. US 12,299,090 B2. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims are directed to the same subject matter of creating a virtual credential to bind to a physical location. A side-by-side analysis of the first independent claim(s) of the instant application and the copending application(s) has been included below. The bolded portions are portions which are almost identical to one another. The non-bolded portions are related to subject matter which are obvious, and do not further define over the subject matter of one another. Therefore, the subject matter of both claim sets are not distinct from one another and yields an obviousness-type double patenting rejection. This is NOT a provisional double patenting rejection since patent document (US 12,299,090 B2) has been issued while the instant application is pending. Here is the following side-by-side analysis of the first independent claim in each application: Instant Application ‘554 1. A system, comprising: one or more memories; and one or more processors, coupled to the one or more memories, configured to: create a virtual credential that is linked to a primary payment credential and that is used as a substitute for the primary payment credential, wherein the virtual credential is bound to a physical location associated with a financial transacting entity and is invalid at any other location; send, to one or more financial transaction terminals at the physical location, information associated with the virtual credential; receive, from a financial transaction terminal requesting authorization for a transaction using the virtual credential, other information related to the virtual credential; and send, to the financial transaction terminal, an authorization decision associated with the transaction based on a relation between the financial transaction terminal and the physical location. Patent No. ‘090 1. A system for enabling an in-person card-not-present transaction, the system comprising: one or more memories; and one or more processors, communicatively coupled to the one or more memories, configured to: create a mapping between physical locations associated with financial transacting entities and financial transaction terminals at the physical locations associated with the financial transacting entities based on historical transaction records received from a transaction backend system; receive, from a user device, a request to create a virtual credential that is linked to a primary payment credential and is used as a substitute for the primary payment credential, wherein the virtual credential is bound to a physical location associated with a financial transacting entity such that the virtual credential is restricted to being valid at the physical location and is invalid at any other location; create, based on the request from the user device, the virtual credential bound to the physical location; send, to one or more financial transaction terminals at the physical location bound to the virtual credential, information to register the virtual credential and identify a user that owns an account associated with the virtual credential; provide, to the user device, tokenized information related to the virtual credential based on a determination that a user attempting to authorize a transaction using the virtual credential is the user that owns the account associated with the virtual credential; receive, from a financial transaction terminal requesting authorization for the transaction, the tokenized information related to the virtual credential; and send, to the financial transaction terminal requesting the authorization for the transaction, an authorization decision associated with the transaction based on whether the financial transaction terminal is present at the physical location bound to the virtual credential. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 are allowed over available prior art references and/or combination(s) of available prior art references but are rejected under Double Patenting. As allowable subject matter has been indicated, applicant's reply must either comply with all formal requirements or specifically traverse each requirement not complied with. See 37 CFR 1.111(b) and MPEP § 707.07(a). REASONS FOR ALLOWANCE The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The Examiner has not found any reasonable prior art(s) nor combination of prior art(s) which teach the feature of ‘the virtual credential is bound to a physical location associated with a financial transacting entity and is invalid at any other location’. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ESTHER B. HENDERSON whose telephone number is (571)270-3807. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6a-2p ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Umar Cheema can be reached at 571-270-3037. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ESTHER B. HENDERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2458 September 4, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750407
Method and Apparatus for Security Management of Internet of Things Traffic, and Power Internet of Things System
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745076
METHODS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR USER AUTHENTICATION
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743254
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISCOVERING AUTOMATABLE TASKS
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12726549
NEXT GEN ZERO TRUST NETWORK ACCESS (ZTNA) AND VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORK (VPN) INCLUDING CLOUD SECURE ACCESS SERVICE EDGE (SASE)
1y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12706895
EMAIL-BASED AUTHENTICATION FOR SIGN IN AND SECURITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.3%)
3y 7m (~2y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 690 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month