Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/203,696

DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
May 09, 2025
Priority
May 13, 2024 — CN 202410592237.7
Examiner
WATKO, JULIE ANNE
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Wuhan Tianma Micro-Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
424 granted / 564 resolved
+13.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
600
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
44.8%
+4.8% vs TC avg
§102
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
§112
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 564 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 8-11 and 16-19 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 02/03/2026. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Drawings The drawings were received on 07/23/2026. These drawings are acceptable; however, an objection to the drawings appears below. The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the feature(s) “a first power signal line of the first power signal lines is electrically connected to a first terminal of the drive transistor, and a second power signal line of the second power signal lines is electrically connected to the first terminal of the drive transistor” (emphasis added) must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-7, 12-15, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation “a first power signal line of the first power signal lines is electrically connected to a first terminal of the drive transistor, and a second power signal line of the second power signal lines is electrically connected to the first terminal of the drive transistor” (emphasis added). This is misdescriptive of elected Species A. The timing diagram in Fig. 6 appears to show no instant during which a first terminal of a drive transistor is electrically connected to both a first power signal line and a second power signal line. Thus, independent claim 1 is not readable upon the elected display panel. A similar recitation in claim 20 is similarly misdescriptive. Other pending claims are indefinite by virtue of dependency from at least one indefinite claim. Regarding claims 1-7, 12-15, and 20: In the absence of a reasonably definite interpretation of a claim, it is improper to rely on speculative assumptions regarding the meaning of a claim and then base a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 on these assumptions (In re Steele, 305 F.2d 859,134 USPQ 292 (CCPA 1962)). See MPEP 2143.03. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 07/23/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Claim limitations added to each independent claim render the claims vague and indefinite. No pending claim is readable upon the elected species. The metes and bounds of the elected claims cannot be reasonably determined. No elected claim is in condition for allowance. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Julie Anne Watko whose telephone number is (571)272-7597. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Tuesday 9AM-5PM, Wednesday 10:30AM-5PM, Thursday-Friday 9AM-5PM, and occasional Saturdays. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ke Xiao can be reached at 571-272-7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. JULIE ANNE WATKO Primary Examiner Art Unit 2627 /Julie Anne Watko/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2627 09/09/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Jul 23, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12738219
Display Device
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738089
DISPLAY PANEL, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732168
LEVEL SHIFTING DEVICE AND METHOD
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12717445
TOUCH SYSTEMS USING NEAR INFRARED FILMS
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12710838
DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+12.3%)
2y 9m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 564 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month