Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 16, 2026
Application No. 19/203,724

PRINTING APPARATUS AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING PRINTING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
May 09, 2025
Priority
Sep 30, 2020 — JP 2020-165465 +3 more
Examiner
LEGESSE, HENOK D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Canon Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
950 granted / 1099 resolved
+26.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
1119
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
31.3%
-8.7% vs TC avg
§112
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1099 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDSs) submitted on 05/09/2025, 03/06/2026, and 08/24/2026 are being considered by the examiner. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim 1 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,325,231. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Instant Application U.S. Patent 12,325,231 Claim 2. A printing apparatus comprising: a holding unit configured to hold a roll-shaped print medium; a printing unit configured to apply ink and thereby print an image on the print medium drawn out from the holding unit; a first discharge destination to which the print medium on which the image is printed is discharged after passing through a first discharge path in a first direction; a second discharge destination to which the print medium on which the image is printed is discharged after passing through a second discharge path in a second direction opposite to the first direction; a cutter configured to cut the print medium, the cutter being arranged on a downstream side of the printing unit and on an upstream side of a branching of the first discharge path and the second discharge path; an obtaining unit configured to obtain information indicating a kind of the print medium held by the holding unit; and a switching unit configured to switch, based on the information, which of the first discharge destination and the second discharge destination is to be a discharge destination of the print medium on which the image is printed. Claim 1. A printing apparatus comprising: a holding unit configured to hold a roll-shaped print medium; a printing unit configured to apply ink and thereby print an image on the print medium drawn out from the holding unit; a first discharge destination to which the print medium on which the image is printed is discharged after passing through a first discharge path in a first direction; a second discharge destination to which the print medium on which the image is printed is discharged after passing through a second discharge path in a second direction opposite to the first direction; a cutter configured to cut the print medium, the cutter being arranged on a downstream side of the printing unit and on an upstream side of a branching of the first discharge path and the second discharge path; an obtaining unit configured to obtain information indicating a kind of the print medium held by the holding unit; and a switching unit configured to switch, based on the information, which of the first discharge destination and the second discharge destination is to be a discharge destination of the print medium on which the image is printed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HENOK D LEGESSE whose telephone number is (571)270-1615. The examiner can normally be reached General Schedule 9:00 am- 5:00 pm, IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Douglas Rodriguez can be reached at (571)431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HENOK D LEGESSE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12759292
FLUID-EJECTION PRINTHEAD HAVING SPARSE ARRAY OF FLUID-EJECTION NOZZLES
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759293
LIQUID DISCHARGE HEAD
2y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12751239
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DISPENSING TREATMENT LIQUID
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747121
LIQUID EJECTING DEVICE WITH SUPPORT PORTION THAT REDUCES SAGGING OF A PRINT MEDIUM
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746762
COATING DEVICE AND IMAGE FORMING SYSTEM
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+2.2%)
2y 1m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1099 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month