Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/203,738

ELEVATORS FOR MEDICAL DEVICES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 09, 2025
Priority
May 14, 2024 — provisional 63/647,211
Examiner
NEAL, TIMOTHY JAY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Boston Scientific Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
632 granted / 812 resolved
+17.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
837
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
47.3%
+7.3% vs TC avg
§102
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
§112
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 812 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 14, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1/a2 as being anticipated by Kubokawa (US 4,593,680). Regarding Claim 1, Kubokawa discloses: An elevator (22) for a medical device, the elevator comprising: an axle (26 receives 25); and a body (body of 22, see Figs. 3, 6, and 7 for different variations) having: a guide surface (surface including 28); a back surface on an opposite side of the body from the guide surface (back of the elevator); a first side surface (right side of 22 in the Fig. 4, for example); a second side surface (left side of 22 in Fig. 4, for example), wherein each of the first side surface and the second side surface extends between the guide surface and the back surface (see Figs. 3-8 showing the surfaces extending between the front and back of 22); and a connector (32) extending outward from the first side surface (shown in Fig. 4, for example), wherein the connector includes a channel that is configured to receive a control member for pivoting the elevator about the axle (see Fig. 4 showing wire 31 extending through 32). Regarding Claim 14, Kubokawa further discloses wherein the connector extends upwardly beyond the guide surface (without providing more language, “upward” does little to limit the claim; because the device can be turned and manipulated, almost any direction is “upward”; Kubokawa’s connector extends in a direction beyond the guide surface and that direction can be considered “upward”). Regarding Claim 19, Kubokawa discloses: A medical device comprising: a shaft (12); a control member (31) extending through the shaft; and a distal tip (15), including an elevator (22) having: a guide surface (surface including 28); a back surface on an opposite side of the elevator from the guide surface (back of the elevator); a first side surface extending between the guide surface and the back surface (right side of 22 in the Fig. 4, for example); and a connector (27) continuous with the first side surface (see Figs. 3-4 showing the connector 27 being continuous with the side of 22), wherein the connector includes a channel that receives the control member (see Fig. 4 showing 31 extending through the channel of 27). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 16 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Utsugi (US 4,452,236) in view of Kubokawa (US 4,593,680). Regarding Claim 16, Utsugi discloses: An elevator for a medical device, the elevator comprising: a body (32) having: a guide surface (see Figs. 6-7 showing guide surface including 61); a back surface on an opposite side of the body from the guide surface (back of 32 opposite the guide surface); a first side surface (right side of 32 as shown in Figs. 6-9); and a connector (see Figs. 6-9 showing elements 34-37 acting as a connector) configured to couple a control member (38) for pivoting the elevator about the axle to the body, wherein the connector includes (a) a first portion extending along the first side surface (shown in Figs. 8-9 in particular, but arguably in each embodiment shown in Figs. 6-9) and (b) a second portion extending along the back surface (see Figs. 6 and 7 in particular showing the connector extending along the back of the guide). Utsugi does not explicitly disclose an axle. Axles or pivots are well-known for these elevators. Kubokawa teaches one such example (26) for facilitating rotation of the elevator. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Utsugi’s elevator to have Kubokawa’s axle. Such a modification incorporates a well-known feature for facilitating rotation of the elevator. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-13, 15, 17-18, and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 2 requires both the channel from claim 1 and that the connector includes a second portion that extends outwardly from the back surface. Kubokawa’s connector does not extend outwardly from the back surface, and the prior art provides no rationale for modifying the reference to do so. Claim 9 requires the channel have an opening and an open side. Kubokawa’s connector includes an opening for receiving the wire, but there is no open side. In this context, “side” is not the same as “end”. The “side” of Kubokawa’s connector is closed, and the prior art fails to provide a reason for modifying the reference to include this feature. Claim 15 requires a second end of the connector to be adjacent to the second side. Kubokawa’s connector does not extend to the second side surface of the body. 32 is relatively short, and there is no reason on the record to extend it beyond its current length. Claim 17 requires the connector to be configured so that the control member extends through the first portion and the second portion. Utsugi’s connector connects to the control member at one end. 38 does not extend through the pin 35. There being no teaching to have a channel through 35, the claim overcomes the closest prior art. Claim 20 is similar to claim 2 in that the connector has a channel and extends along the back surface. As stated above, the prior art does not read on this limitation. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIMOTHY JAY NEAL whose telephone number is (313)446-4878. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 7:30-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anhtuan Nguyen can be reached at (571)272-4963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIMOTHY J NEAL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3795
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745900
ILLUMINATION SOURCES FOR MULTICORE FIBER ENDOSCOPES
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740691
DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING SEALABLE ACCESS TO A WORKING CHANNEL
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733796
BIOPSY CAP FOR USE WITH ENDOSCOPE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727740
AN ENDOSCOPE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12714295
OVERTUBE FOR ENDOSCOPE
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+13.5%)
2y 9m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 812 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month