Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/204,155

COLOR GAMUT OPTIMIZATIONS FOR ADDITIVE DISPLAY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 09, 2025
Examiner
SASINOWSKI, ANDREW
Art Unit
2625
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Meta Platforms Technologies, LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
664 granted / 855 resolved
+15.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
864
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
43.6%
+3.6% vs TC avg
§102
35.7%
-4.3% vs TC avg
§112
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 855 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hack et. al. [2022/0358877]. Regarding claim 1, Hack teaches: An additive display device comprising: a first light source corresponding to a first color channel that represents a first color primary; a second light source corresponding to a second color channel that represents a second color primary [§0048, note RGB subpixels]; and a transparent display for displaying the first color channel and the second color channel [§0021, note transparent display]; herein at least one of the first color primary or the second color primary is selected for visibility of an image displayed on the transparent display when superimposed with light viewed through the transparent display [§0082, note color change in response to ambient light conditions]. Claims 2-11 and 17 pertain to specific colors or color ranges to be displayed on the screen. Such claim elements are statements of intended use to the device/method, and as such do not have patentable weight. Regarding claim 12, Hack teaches: a color selective filter configured to attenuate light corresponding to at least one of the first color primary or the second color primary [§0039, note “Hyperbolic metamaterials, on the other hand, are anisotropic media in which the permittivity or permeability are of different sign for different spatial directions”] Regarding claim 13 and 18, Hack teaches: wherein the color selective filter corresponds to at least one of: a fixed filter; a dynamic filter that changes an amount of light attenuation over time; a filter that produces substantially uniform light attenuation across space; a filter that varies light attenuation across space to create a spatial pattern of light attenuation [§0039, note “Hyperbolic metamaterials, on the other hand, are anisotropic media in which the permittivity or permeability are of different sign for different spatial directions”]; a spatial light modulator stacked with a static color filter; a spatial light modulator that attenuates a first wavelength of light more than a second wavelength of light; a reflective element that is reflective for at least one of the first color primary or the second color primary; or a polarization-selective filter. Regarding claims 14 and 19, Hack teaches: further comprising a third light source corresponding to a third color channel that represents a third color primary [§0048, note RGB subpixels]; Regarding claim 16, Hack teaches: A system comprising: a first light source corresponding to a first color channel that represents a first color primary; a second light source corresponding to a second color channel that represents a second color primary [§0048, note RGB subpixels]; and a transparent display for displaying the first color channel and the second color channel [§0021, note transparent display]; wherein at least one of the first color primary or the second color primary is selected for visibility of an image displayed on the transparent display when superimposed with light viewed through the transparent display [§0082, note color change in response to ambient light conditions]. Regarding claim 20, Hack teaches: A computer-implemented method comprising: receiving image data having an output color for a display unit element represented by a first color channel and a second color channel [§0048, note RGB subpixels]; displaying, on a transparent display medium for the display unit element, a first color primary light with a first intensity based on the first color channel of the image data; and displaying, on the transparent display medium for the display unit element, a second color primary light with a second intensity based on the second color channel of the image data [§0021, note transparent display]. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Li et. al. [2020/0273413], Yu et. al. [10,217,392] and Masuyama [2018/0033395]. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW SASINOWSKI whose telephone number is (571)270-5883. The examiner can normally be reached 7am - 4pm, Mon.-Fri. EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Boddie can be reached at 571-272-0666. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW SASINOWSKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2625
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592249
HEAT ASSISTED MAGNETIC RECORDING WRITER HAVING A NOTCHED WRITE POLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12578788
Persistent Human-Machine Interfaces via Gaze and Eye Direction Tracking
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573339
DISPLAY DEVICE OPERATING WITH TIME-DIVISION AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567362
DISPLAY DEVICE, METHOD OF DRIVING THE DISPLAY DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12567381
DRIVING CONTROLLER AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 855 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month