Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/204,354

TOUCH STATE DETECTION CIRCUIT, ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING TOUCH STATE DETECTION CIRCUIT, AND TOUCH STATE DETECTION METHOD

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
May 09, 2025
Examiner
PERVAN, MICHAEL
Art Unit
2629
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Wacom Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
736 granted / 912 resolved
+18.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
927
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
49.2%
+9.2% vs TC avg
§102
29.9%
-10.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 912 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1, 3-14 and 16-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-14 of U.S. Patent No. 11,995,282. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims of the patent anticipate the claims of the present Application. Claims 1, 3-14 and 16-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-12 of U.S. Patent No. 12,327,000. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claims of the patent anticipate the claims of the present Application. Present Application U.S. Patent No. 12,327,000 U.S. Patent No. 11,995,282 1. A touch state detection circuit that is connected to a touch sensor, the touch state detection circuit comprising: a processor; and a memory storing firmware that, when executed by the processor, causes the touch state detection circuit to: execute a touch scan in a first period, wherein the touch scan is configured to detect a touch; and execute a pen scan in a second period, wherein the touch scan is configured to detect an electronic pen, wherein the touch scan and the pen scan are executed in a time-division manner; and in response to determining that a determination condition indicating a situation in which a scan condition is required to be changed is satisfied, change an execution frequency or an execution period of at least one of the touch scan or the pen scan. 1. A touch state detection method performed by a touch state detection circuit which is connected to a touch sensor and which detects a touch state of a user by executing a scan process, the touch state detection method comprising: setting a scan condition related to an execution frequency of the scan process or an execution period of the scan process; and detecting the touch state by executing the scan process under the scan condition, 12. The touch state detection method according to claim 1, wherein the scan process is executed to detect a pen state of an electronic pen and the touch state in a time-division manner, wherein the scan condition indicates a ratio of the execution frequency of the scan process for detecting the touch state to the execution frequency of the scan process for detecting the pen state, and wherein, when the determination condition is satisfied, changing and resetting the ratio. wherein, when a determination condition indicating a situation in which the scan condition is required to be changed, the setting includes changing and resetting the scan condition, and wherein, when a first condition is satisfied as the determination condition, the setting includes changing the execution frequency or the execution period. 1. A touch state detection circuit which is connected to a capacitance-type touch sensor including a plurality of sensor electrodes disposed in a planar manner and which detects a touch state of a user by executing a scan process that reads out and processes detection signals sequentially output from the sensor electrodes, the touch state detection circuit comprising: a setting circuit which, in operation, sets a scan condition related to an execution frequency of the scan process or an execution period of the scan process; and a detection circuit which, in operation, detects the touch state by executing the scan process under the scan condition set by the setting circuit, 12. The touch state detection circuit according to claim 1, wherein the scan process is executed to detect a pen state of an electronic pen and the touch state in a time-division manner, wherein the scan condition indicates a ratio of the execution frequency of the scan process for detecting the touch state to the execution frequency of the scan process for detecting the pen state, and, wherein, when the determination condition is satisfied, the setting circuit changes and resets the ratio. wherein, when a determination condition indicating a situation in which the scan condition is required to be changed is satisfied, the setting circuit changes and resets the scan condition, and the detection circuit detects the touch state under the scan condition reset by the setting circuit, and wherein, when a first condition is satisfied as the determination condition, the setting circuit changes and resets the scan condition such that the execution frequency becomes higher than a reference execution frequency or the execution period becomes shorter than a reference execution period. 14. A touch state detection method performed by a touch state detection circuit which is connected to a touch sensor, the method comprising: executing a touch scan in a first period, wherein the touch scan is configured to detect a touch; and executing a pen scan in a second period, wherein the touch scan is configured to detect an electronic pen, wherein the touch scan and the pen scan are executed in a time-division manner; and in response to determining that a determination condition indicating a situation in which a scan condition is required to be changed is satisfied, changing an execution frequency or an execution period of at least one of the touch scan or the pen scan. 1. A touch state detection method performed by a touch state detection circuit which is connected to a touch sensor and which detects a touch state of a user by executing a scan process, the touch state detection method comprising: setting a scan condition related to an execution frequency of the scan process or an execution period of the scan process; and detecting the touch state by executing the scan process under the scan condition, 12. The touch state detection method according to claim 1, wherein the scan process is executed to detect a pen state of an electronic pen and the touch state in a time-division manner, wherein the scan condition indicates a ratio of the execution frequency of the scan process for detecting the touch state to the execution frequency of the scan process for detecting the pen state, and wherein, when the determination condition is satisfied, changing and resetting the ratio. wherein, when a determination condition indicating a situation in which the scan condition is required to be changed, the setting includes changing and resetting the scan condition, and wherein, when a first condition is satisfied as the determination condition, the setting includes changing the execution frequency or the execution period. 14. A touch state detection method performed by a touch state detection circuit which is connected to a capacitance-type touch sensor including a plurality of sensor electrodes disposed in a planar manner and which detects a touch state of a user by executing a scan process that reads out and processes detection signals sequentially output from the sensor electrodes, the touch state detection method comprising: setting a scan condition related to an execution frequency of the scan process or an execution period of the scan process; and detecting the touch state by executing the scan process under the scan condition set by the setting, wherein the setting and the detecting are sequentially and repetitively performed, 12. The touch state detection circuit according to claim 1, wherein the scan process is executed to detect a pen state of an electronic pen and the touch state in a time-division manner, wherein the scan condition indicates a ratio of the execution frequency of the scan process for detecting the touch state to the execution frequency of the scan process for detecting the pen state, and, wherein, when the determination condition is satisfied, the setting circuit changes and resets the ratio. wherein, when a determination condition indicating a situation in which the scan condition is required to be changed is satisfied, the setting includes changing and resetting the scan condition, and the detecting includes detecting the touch state under the scan condition reset by the setting, and wherein, when a first condition is satisfied as the determination condition, the setting includes changing and resetting the scan condition such that the execution frequency becomes higher than a reference execution frequency or the execution period becomes shorter than a reference execution period. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 and 15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Michael Pervan whose telephone number is (571)272-0910. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri between 7:00am - 4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Lee can be reached on (571) 272-2963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL PERVAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2629 February 20, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596450
Method of controlling touch sensor and related touch sensing circuit
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588852
NEURAL INTERFACE SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12578769
HOUSING STRUCTURE OF ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12566521
TOUCH PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE WITH ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE PROTECTION PATTERN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12554342
TOUCH PAD AND COMPUTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+7.8%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 912 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month