Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/204,873

CUSHIONING MATERIAL, PACKING MATERIAL, AND PACKAGE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
May 12, 2025
Priority
Feb 18, 2022 — JP 2022-023394 +1 more
Examiner
ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Seiko Epson Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allowance Rate
708 granted / 1159 resolved
+1.1% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+35.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1197
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
86.6%
+46.6% vs TC avg
§102
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§112
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1159 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Recited language of claim 3 is indefinite because it is unclear what structure of the cushioning material is further defined in the claim. The claim is indefinite because claim 1 is directed to a cushioning material which is an apparatus claim, and claim 3 is referring to a graph which does not further define any structural feature of the cushioning material. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Luu (US 6,503,590). Luu discloses a cushioning material (10) comprising cushioning structures (defined by layers of the cushioning material) stacked on top of another and configured to reduce an external force acting on an electrical device, wherein the cushioning structures include a first cushioning structure (14) that is positioned capable to intersect a direction of the external force acting on the electrical device and a second cushioning structure (16) that has a higher strength in the direction of the external force acting on the electrical device than the first cushioning structure and is positioned and capable to intersect the direction of the external force acting on the electrical device. Luu discloses the cushioning material comprises layer (16) made from polyethylene while layer (14) is made from Styrofoam material (see abstract), wherein polyethylene material is of higher strength than Styrofoam. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Luu (US 6,503,590) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Ryan, Jr. (3,231,079). Claims 4 and 5 Luu further discloses an item (28) and packaging box (26) holding/enclosing the cushioning material and the item (see figure 12). Luu is silent disclosing the item enclosed within the packaging box is an electrical device. However, Ryan, Jr discloses a package (10) comprising a cushioning material (12) enclosing a radio article (see column 2 lines 3-7). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Luu having a radio within the cushioning material as taught by Ryan, Jr. as a type of item to be enclosed within the packaging box. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 2 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Examiner has cited particular paragraphs and/or columns and line numbers in the references as applied to the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings of the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested of the applicant, in preparing responses, to fully consider the references in entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or prior art(s) disclosed by the Examiner (in the attached PTO-892 form). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAFAEL A. ORTIZ whose telephone number is (571)270-5240. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9am - 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Orlando E. Aviles can be reached at 571-270-5531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. RAFAEL A. ORTIZ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3736 /RAFAEL A ORTIZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3736
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 12, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679597
CRATE WITH ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679622
Containers with Inflatable Dunnage
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679625
CUSHIONING MEMBER FOR PACKED OBJECT
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673813
Washing Agent Presentation Form
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673804
REUSABLE AND RECYCLEABLE NESTING PALLET
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+35.4%)
2y 6m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1159 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month