Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/205,181

PRINT SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 12, 2025
Examiner
FERGUSON SAMRETH, MARISSA LIANA
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
537 granted / 773 resolved
+1.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
796
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
54.2%
+14.2% vs TC avg
§102
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 773 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 2, 9 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated over Nohara et al. (US Publication 2017/0080721). With respect to claim 2, Nohara teaches a printer configured to be driven by a plurality of power sources, the printer comprising: a first drive circuit (54) configured to drive a head (112) to perform printing on a medium (S); a second drive circuit (51) configured to drive a conveyance motor (53) to generate motive power to convey the medium; a first connector (34C) configured to connect a first power source (34); a second connector (102) configured to connect a second power source (BT); and a power supply circuit (Figure 3) configured to supply power to the first drive circuit (54) and to the second drive circuit (51), wherein when the printer (1) is being driven by both the first power source (34) and the second power source (BT), the power supply circuit (Figure 3) supplies at least some of a first power to the first drive circuit (54) and at least some of a second power to the second drive circuit (51), the first power being a power of the first power source (34), and the second power being a power of the second power source (BT, Paragraphs 0032-0035, 0050, 0053-0055). With respect to claim 9, Nohara et al. teaches a processor (CPU, 52); and a memory (EEPROM) storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, perform process (Paragraph 0033) comprising: performing detection processing of detecting whether a usable power source is connected, by detecting a voltage of each of the plurality of the power sources (Paragraphs 0008, 0033, 0041, 0045, 0053 and many references throughout patent). With respect to claim 12, Nohara et al. teaches a display portion configured to display information indicating which of the power sources (9), of the plurality of the power sources (9, Paragraphs 0033, 0051, 0053, 0072), is being used. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3, 10 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 as being unpatentable over Nohara et al. (US Publication 2017/0080721). With respect to claim 3, Nohara teaches a printer configured to be driven by a plurality of power sources, the printer comprising: a first drive circuit (54) configured to drive a head (112) to perform printing on a medium (S); a second drive circuit (51) configured to drive a conveyance motor (53) to generate motive power to convey the medium; a first connector (34C) configured to connect a battery (BT); a second connector (102) configured to connect a AC adaptor (34, Paragraph 0032); and a power supply circuit (Figure 3) configured to supply power to the first drive circuit (54) and to the second drive circuit (51), wherein when the printer (1) is being driven by both the battery (BT) and the second power source (34), the power supply circuit (Figure 3) supplies at least some of a first power to the first drive circuit (54) and at least some of a second power to the second drive circuit (51, Paragraphs 0032-0035, 0050, 0053-0055). Nohara et al. does not explicitly disclose the first power being a power of the battery (BT), and the second power being a power of the AC adapter. However, does not disclose the first power source is a battery and the second power source is an AC adapter. It has been held that a mere reversal of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art. In re Einstein, 8 USPQ 167. It would have been obvious to provide a first power source is a battery and a second power source is an AC adapter since such a modification would result in a more versatile printer that effectively supplies a consistent amount of power. With respect to claim 10, Nohara et al. teaches a processor (CPU, 52); and a memory (EEPROM) storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, perform process (Paragraph 0033) comprising: performing detection processing of detecting whether a usable power source is connected, by detecting a voltage of each of the plurality of the power sources (Paragraphs 0008, 0033, 0041, 0045, 0053 and many references throughout patent). With respect to claim 13, Nohara et al. teaches a display portion configured to display information indicating which of the power sources (9), of the plurality of the power sources (9, Paragraphs 0033, 0051, 0053, 0072), is being used. Claims 4, 11, 14 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 as being unpatentable over Nohara et al. (US Publication 2017/0080721) in view of Silverbrook (US Publication 2006/0132560). With respect to claim 4, Nohara et al. teaches a first drive circuit (54) configured to drive a head (112) to perform printing on a medium (S); a second drive circuit (51) configured to drive a conveyance motor (53) to generate motive power to convey the medium; a first connector (34C) configured to connect a battery (BT); a second connector (102); a power supply circuit (Figure 3) configured to supply power to the first drive circuit (54) and to the second drive circuit (51), wherein the battery (BT) is connected to the first connector (34C), the power supply circuit (Figure 3) supplies at least some of a first power to the first drive circuit (54) and at least some of a second power to the second drive circuit (51, Paragraphs 0032-0035, 0050, 0053-0055). Nohara et al. does not explicitly disclose a second connector configured to connect a USB power supply, the USB power supply is connected to the second connector and the second power being a power of the USB power supply. Silverbrook teaches a second connector configured to connect a USB power supply (206), the USB power supply (206) is connected to the second connector (Paragraphs 0176, 0189) and the second power being a power of the USB (206) power supply. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the present invention was made to modify the third power source taught by Nohara et al. since it would require obvious substitution of a known power supply with a USB power supply as taught by Silverbrook for the purpose of providing a more energy efficient power supply with more current in a shorter amount of time. With respect to claim 11, Nohara et al. teaches a processor (CPU, 52); and a memory (EEPROM) storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, perform process (Paragraph 0033) comprising: performing detection processing of detecting whether a usable power source is connected, by detecting a voltage of each of the plurality of the power sources (Paragraphs 0008, 0033, 0041, 0045, 0053 and many references throughout patent). With respect to claim 14, Nohara et al. teaches a display portion configured to display information indicating which of the power sources (9), of the plurality of the power sources (9, Paragraphs 0033, 0051, 0053, 0072), is being used. With respect to claim 21, Nohara et al. teaches the first drive circuit (54) drives the head (112) and the second drive circuit (51) drive the conveyance motor (53), during a period when printing is performed (Paragraphs 0039. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-8 and 15-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. With respect to claim 5, the prior art does not teach the power supply circuit includes a first wiring line electrically connected to the second connector and the first drive circuit, a first switch configured to switch the first wiring line to a conduction state and a non-conduction state, a second wiring line electrically connected to the second connector and the second drive circuit, a second switch configured to switch the second wiring line to a conduction state and to a non-conduction state, a third wiring line electrically connected to the first wiring line, between the first switch and the first drive circuit, and electrically connected to the second wiring line, between the second switch and the second drive circuit, a third switch configured to switch the third wiring line to a conduction state and to a non-conduction state, and a fourth wiring line electrically connected to the first connector and electrically connected to the first wiring line, between the first switch and the first drive circuit. With respect to claim 6, the prior art does not teach or render obvious the power supply circuit includes a first wiring line electrically connected to the second connector and the first drive circuit, a first switch configured to switch the first wiring line to a conduction state and a non-conduction state, a second wiring line electrically connected to the second connector and the second drive circuit, a second switch configured to switch the second wiring line to a conduction state and to a non-conduction state, a third wiring line electrically connected to the first wiring line, between the first switch and the first drive circuit, and electrically connected to the second wiring line, between the second switch and the second drive circuit, a third switch configured to switch the third wiring line to a conduction state and to a non-conduction state, and a fourth wiring line electrically connected to the first connector and electrically connected to the first wiring line, between the first switch and the first drive circuit. With respect to claim 7, the prior art does not teach or render obvious when the printer is being driven by both the battery and the USB power supply, the power supply circuit supplies at least some of the first power to the head and at least some of the second power to the conveyance motor. With respect to claim 8, the prior art does not teach the power supply circuit includes a first wiring line electrically connected to the second connector and the first drive circuit, a first switch configured to switch the first wiring line to a conduction state and a non-conduction state, a second wiring line electrically connected to the second connector and the second drive circuit, a second switch configured to switch the second wiring line to a conduction state and to a non-conduction state, a third wiring line electrically connected to the first wiring line, between the first switch and the first drive circuit, and electrically connected to the second wiring line, between the second switch and the second drive circuit, a third switch configured to switch the third wiring line to a conduction state and to a non-conduction state, and a fourth wiring line electrically connected to the first connector and electrically connected to the first wiring line, between the first switch and the first drive circuit. With respect to claim 15, the prior art does not teach or render obvious a processor; and a memory storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, perform processes comprising: performing acquisition processing of acquiring a temperature of the first power source; and performing decision processing of deciding a print speed based on the temperature of the first power source acquired by the acquisition processing, the print speed being a speed of performing the printing on the medium, wherein the decision processing decreasing the print speed in response to the temperature, acquired by the acquisition processing, of the first power source becoming low, and deciding the print speed to cause the print speed when the first power source is connected to the first connector and the second power source is connected to the second connector to be equal to or faster than the print speed when the first power source is connected to the first connector and the second power source, in a further operational arrangement, is not connected to the second connector. With respect to claim 16, the prior art does not teach or render obvious a processor; and a memory storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, perform processes comprising: performing acquisition processing of acquiring a temperature of the battery; and performing decision processing of deciding a print speed based on the temperature of the battery acquired by the acquisition processing, the print speed being a speed of performing the printing on the medium, wherein the decision processing includes decreasing the print speed in response to the temperature, acquired by the acquisition processing, of the battery becoming low, and deciding the print speed to cause the print speed when the battery is connected to the first connector and the AC adaptor is connected to the second connector to be equal to or faster than the print speed when the battery is connected to the first connector and the AC adaptor, in a further operational arrangement, is not connected to the second connector. With respect to claim 17, the prior art does not teach or render obvious a processor; and a memory storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, perform processes comprising: performing acquisition processing of acquiring a temperature of the battery; and performing decision processing of deciding a print speed based on the temperature of the battery acquired by the acquisition processing, the print speed being a speed of performing the printing on the medium, wherein the decision processing includes decreasing the print speed in response to the temperature, acquired by the acquisition processing, of the battery becoming low, and deciding the print speed to cause the print speed when the battery is connected to the first connector and the USB power supply is connected to the second connector to be equal to or faster than the print speed when the battery is connected to the first connector and the USB power supply, in a further operational arrangement, is not connected to the second connector. With respect to claim 18, the prior art does not teach or render obvious a processor; and a memory storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, perform processes comprising: performing first determination processing of determining, when the first power source is connected to the first connector and the second power source is connected to the second connector, whether to execute a power suppression mode suppressing the at least some of the first power supplied by the first power source; and performing restriction processing of restricting a number of on dots, heated, among a plurality of heating elements of the head, when the first determination processing determines to execute the power suppression mode. With respect to claim 19, the prior art does not teach or render obvious a processor; and a memory storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, perform processes comprising: performing first determination processing of determining, when the battery is connected to the first connector and the AC adaptor is connected to the second connector, whether to execute a power suppression mode suppressing the at least some of the first power supplied by the battery; and performing restriction processing of restricting a number of on dots, heated, among a plurality of heating elements of the head, when the first determination processing determines to execute the power suppression mode. With respect to claim 20, the prior art does not teach or render obvious a processor; and a memory storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, perform processes comprising: performing first determination processing of determining, when the battery is connected to the first connector and the USB power supply is connected to the second connector, whether to execute a power suppression mode suppressing the at least some of the first power supplied by the battery; and performing restriction processing of restricting a number of on dots, heated, among a plurality of heating elements of the head, when the first determination processing determines to execute the power suppression mode. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARISSA LIANA FERGUSON SAMRETH whose telephone number is (571)272-2163. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 a.m.-5 p.m. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Meier can be reached at 571-272-2149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Marissa Ferguson-Samreth/Examiner, Art Unit 2853 /CHRISTOPHER E MAHONEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 12, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594756
SYSTEM FOR RECOVERING A CLEANING SOLUTION AND PRINTING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583249
ROLLER FOR HOT STAMPING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577080
PRINTING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12576654
FOOD PRODUCT SCALE AND ASSOCIATED LABEL STOCK JUSTIFICATION ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12558916
METAL DECORATION MANUFACTURING APPARATUS AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+11.9%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 773 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month