Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/206,708

VEHICLE DRIVE DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 13, 2025
Priority
Jun 24, 2024 — JP 2024-101521
Examiner
WEBB, TIFFANY L
Art Unit
3614
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Aisin Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
153 granted / 167 resolved
+39.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 8m
Avg Prosecution
6 currently pending
Career history
174
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
54.8%
+14.8% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 167 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Examiner acknowledges receipt of amendments to the claims dated 2/4/2026. By amendment, claims 2-4 remain pending and are discussed below. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/1/2025 was filed after the mailing date of the non-final action on 11/6/2025. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Allowable Subject Matter The indicated allowability of claims 2-4 is withdrawn in view of the newly discovered reference(s) to DE 10 2021 213672 to Muller et al. (hereinafter Muller) and WO 2023/241971 to Muller-Linkowitsch et al. (hereinafter Muller-Link) that were provided on the IDS submitted by applicant on 12/1/2025. Rejections based on the newly cited reference(s) follow. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 2 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by DE 10 2021 213672 to Muller-Linkowitsch et al. (hereinafter Muller). Regarding claim 2, Muller discloses a vehicle drive device comprising: a rotating electric machine (1); a differential gear mechanism (3) being connected to left and right wheels (5) and transmitting driving force from the rotating electric machine (1) to the wheels (5); a first braking device (4) being placed between the differential gear mechanism (3) and the left wheel (5) on a power transmission path and generating braking force against rotation of the left wheel (5; see at least Figure 3); a second braking device (4) being placed between the differential gear mechanism (3) and the right wheel (5) on a power transmission path and generating braking force against rotation of the right wheel (5: see at least Figure 3); and a case supporting (9) the rotating electric machine (1), the differential gear mechanism (3), the first braking device (4), and the second braking device (4); a first speed reduction mechanism (2) being placed between the differential gear mechanism (3) and the left wheel (5) on a power transmission path and being supported by the case (9); and a second speed reduction mechanism (2) being placed between the differential gear mechanism (3) and the right wheel (5) on a power transmission path and being supported by the case (9), wherein the first braking device (4) is placed between the differential gear mechanism (3) and the first speed reduction mechanism (2) on a power transmission path (see configuration in Figure 3), and the second braking device (4) is placed between the differential gear mechanism (3) and the second speed reduction mechanism (2) on a power transmission path (see other side of configuration shown in Figure 3). Regarding claim 3, Muller discloses a vehicle drive device comprising: a rotating electric machine (1); a differential gear mechanism (3) being connected to left and right wheels (5) and transmitting driving force from the rotating electric machine (1) to the wheels (5); a first braking device (4) being placed between the differential gear mechanism (3) and the left wheel (5) on a power transmission path and generating braking force against rotation of the left wheel (5; see at least Figure 3); a second braking device (4) being placed between the differential gear mechanism (3) and the right wheel (5) on a power transmission path and generating braking force against rotation of the right wheel (5: see at least Figure 3); and a case supporting (9) the rotating electric machine (1), the differential gear mechanism (3), the first braking device (4), and the second braking device (4); wherein the first braking device and second braking device (4) are placed outside of a rotor of the rotating electric machine (1) in a radial direction around a rotation shaft of the wheel (5; see at least Figure 3 showing the braking devices 4 outside of the rotor of rotating machine 1 in a radial direction around the shaft of the wheel 5). Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by WIPO/PCT WO 2023/241971 to Muller-Linkowitsch et al. (hereinafter Muller-Link; all references to written description are to the provided English translation). Regarding claim 4, Muller-Link discloses a vehicle drive device comprising: a rotating electric machine (2); a differential gear mechanism (3) being connected to left and right wheels (5) and transmitting driving force from the rotating electric machine (2) to the wheels (5); a first braking device (6) being placed between the differential gear mechanism (3) and the left wheel (5) on a power transmission path and generating braking force against rotation of the left wheel (5; see at least Figure 1); a second braking device (6) being placed between the differential gear mechanism (3) and the right wheel (5) on a power transmission path and generating braking force against rotation of the right wheel (5: see at least Figure 1); and a case supporting (1) the rotating electric machine (2), the differential gear mechanism (3), the first braking device (6), and the second braking device (6); wherein the braking device is hydraulic (actuator 10; see Abstract), and the vehicle drive device further comprises: an electric oil pump (see Abstract; see also page 3, paragraph 2); a first oil passage (pressure oil system 9) guiding oil pressure-fed from the electric oil pump to the first braking device and the second braking device (see last paragraph of page 3 through paragraph 9 on page 4); and a second oil passage guiding oil pressure-fed from the electric oil pump to the rotating electric machine or the differential gear mechanism in the case (see page 4, paragraph 9 discussing the use of the oil circuits for the thermal management of the drive unit/differential/electric machine). Response to Arguments Applicant has not provided arguments due to the indication of allowable subject matter, however, due to the newly provided prior art, the grounds of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Tiffany L. Webb whose telephone number is (571)272-3950. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason Shanske can be reached at 571-270-5985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /T.L.W./Examiner, Art Unit 3614 /JASON D SHANSKE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3614
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 13, 2025
Application Filed
Nov 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Feb 04, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 15, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 15, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12654502
AIR SUSPENSION SYSTEM
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12630227
Off-Road Vehicle
1y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12611928
WORKING VEHICLE
1y 4m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12606984
WORKING MACHINE
1y 4m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12589979
FORKLIFT CAB ENCLOSURE SYSTEM
1y 3m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+7.6%)
1y 8m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 167 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month