Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/207,791

PORTABLE TERMINAL DEVICE, TELEVISION RECEIVER, AND INCOMING CALL NOTIFICATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 14, 2025
Priority
Sep 23, 2016 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2016077930 +3 more
Examiner
MARANDI, JAMES R
Art Unit
2421
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Maxell Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
297 granted / 496 resolved
+1.9% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
513
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
86.7%
+46.7% vs TC avg
§102
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
§112
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 496 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claim 1 is rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1 of U.S. Patent Nos. 12,323,670; 11,812,109; and 11,310,561. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claim 1 of patent 12,323,670 includes the additional limitations of "a speaker configured to output sound when the incoming communication is received" and “without outputting the sound by the speaker”. Accordingly, instant application’s claim 1 is broader than patented claim 1, therefore, obvious over patent claim 1. Similar analysis applies to the claims 1 of issued patents 11,812,109 and 11,310,561 in the chain of continuity. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fujimoto, USPGPUB 2014/0373102 (hereinafter “Fujimoto”). Fujimoto reference is of record and is cited on the IDS received on 05/14/2025 Regarding claim 1, Fujimoto discloses a mobile terminal (Figs. 1, 5, 14, 16, 18, smartphone 200/200A) configured to send information to an external display apparatus (Figs. 1, 5, 16, ¶¶ [81]-[98], [136], Television 100), the mobile terminal comprising: a communication interface configured to receive incoming communication (Fig. 14, 205); a sensor configured to detect whether the mobile terminal is placed with a screen of the mobile terminal facing down or not while the mobile terminal is away from a user’s hand (As shown in Figs. 1 and 18 ¶ [86]); and a processor programmed to communicate with the external display apparatus television (201 / 206, ¶¶ [82]- [87]), wherein the processor is configured to: in response to receiving the incoming communication while the mobile terminal is placed with the screen facing down, change the information related to the incoming communication based on the sensor detecting that the mobile terminalis placed with the screen facing down (Fig. 5, S5, and corresponding description; Fig. 16, S5, and corresponding description); and send the changed information related to the communication to the incoming communication to the external display apparatus (Fig. 5, S5, and corresponding description; Fig. 16, S5, and corresponding description). Contacts Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES R MARANDI whose telephone number is (571)270-1843. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8-7 ET flex. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan J Flynn can be reached at 571-272-1915. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES R MARANDI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2421
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 14, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677033
METHODS AND APPARATUS TO IDENTIFY AN EPISODE NUMBER BASED ON FINGERPRINT AND MATCHED VIEWING INFORMATION
1y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12659535
INTELLIGENT INTERACTIVE VIDEO CONTENT BASED ON CONTEXTUAL AWARENESS FOR MOBILE APPLICATIONS
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12659549
USER INTERFACE FOR IMPROVING USER ENGAGEMENT ON A MEDIA CONTENT ITEM BEING PRESENTED
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12652429
METHOD FOR SWITCHING CONTROL COMMANDS ACROSS PLATFORMS AND SMART DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12652432
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING A NOTIFICATION IN RESPONSE TO A LIVE BROADCAST
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+28.1%)
3y 3m (~2y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 496 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month