Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 19/208,056

PROJECTION DEVICE FOR GENERATING DYNAMIC PROJECTIONS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 14, 2025
Examiner
EIDE, ERIC T
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Fev Group GMBH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
283 granted / 427 resolved
-1.7% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
441
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
52.4%
+12.4% vs TC avg
§102
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
§112
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 427 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 05/14/2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-8, and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mototsuji (US 2021/0341123). Regarding claim 1, Mototsuji discloses a projection device for generating dynamic projections, comprising: an arrangement having a plurality of light source (32, Fig. 2) spaced apart from each other; a collimation optic (20A-20C, Fig. 2) for generating a parallel beam path from the light sources; and a microlens array (1042A-C, Fig. 13) arrangement in the beam path of a collimating optic, wherein a focal length (specifically the point where the light converges to in Fig. 15a or Fig. 15b) of lenses at an illumination side of the microlens array arrangement is larger than a distance of the lenses to a slide plane (the distance between 1042B and 50a). Regarding claim 2, Mototsuji discloses the light sources are arranged in a linear manner or in a shape of a matrix (Figs. 1 or 2). Regarding claim 3, Mototsuji discloses the lenses are designed for covering an entire surface (Fig. 1). Regarding claim 4, Mototsuji discloses the lenses are arranged in a square, rectangular or hexagonal manner (Fig. 1). Regarding claim 5, Mototsuji discloses the focal length of the lenses at the illumination side is larger than a focal length of lenses at a projection side of the microlens array arrangement (specifically, looking at Fig. 15a or 15b shows the focal length passing 50 while on the F is pointing to the focal length of 1044A or B, Paragraph 0207). Regarding claim 6, Mototsuji discloses the microlens array arrangement comprises a microlens array having a carrier (the carrier being the area below the lens and above 50a, Fig. 15a-b) and a matrix-shaped arrangement comprising a plurality of lenses (the lenses, 1042a-b). Regarding claim 7, Mototsuji discloses the carrier and the lenses are designed as single piece (Figs. 15a-b). Regarding claim 8, Mototsuji discloses the microlens array arrangement comprises a first microlens array (1042A-B, Figs. 15a-b) at the illumination side and a second microlens array (1044A-B, Figs. 15A-B) at a projection side. Regarding claim 10, Mototsuji discloses a projection method for generating dynamic projections, comprising a step of illuminating a microlens array (1042A-B, Figs. 15A, B) arrangement by a plurality of light sources (32, Fig. 2) spaced apart from each other, wherein a focal length of lenses at an illumination side of the microlens array arrangement is larger than a distance of the lenses to a slide plane (50A, Fig. 15A and B). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mototsuji (US 2021/0341123) in view of Lee (US 11168857). Regarding claim 9, Mototsuji fails to teach the required focal length Lee teaches the focal length (the point where the light is going to in Fig. 8) of the lenses at the illumination side corresponds to a sum of a thickness of the microlens array at the illumination side and the thickness of the microlens array at the projection side (the sum of 130, Fig. 8). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the earliest effective filing date to have included having the focal length of Mototsuji of the lenses at the illumination side being a sum of the thickness of the microlens arrays as taught by Lee, in order to provide a different light distribution as needed for a given application of the device. Relevant Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Moser et al. (US 2019/0072252), Go et al. (US 11644170), Lim (US 11441752), and Eckstein et al. (US 10232763) teach a collimator, with lenses and wall sections. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERIC T EIDE whose telephone number is (571)272-7405. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jong-Suk (James) Lee can be reached at (571)272-7044. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERIC T EIDE/ Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 14, 2025
Application Filed
Dec 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 27, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599824
Illuminated Hockey Puck Assembly
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600290
VEHICLE MODULAR ACCESSORY MOUNTING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589688
SIDE TURN INDICATOR INTEGRATED WITH A FENDER OF A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591088
BACKLIGHT MODULE AND NAKED-EYE STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584613
LIGHT-EMITTING MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+22.8%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 427 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month