Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/208,066

TRANSMISSION SYSTEM FOR DRILLING MACHINE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 14, 2025
Examiner
LOPEZ, MICHELLE
Art Unit
3731
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Caterpillar Global Mining Equipment LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
900 granted / 1103 resolved
+11.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1126
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
39.6%
-0.4% vs TC avg
§102
33.0%
-7.0% vs TC avg
§112
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1103 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to the application filed on 05/14/25. Claims 1-20 are pending and have been examined. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 05/14/25 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Loyd (3,677,352) in view of Chatterjea (DE 4000185 A1). Regarding claims 1 and 10, Loyd discloses a transmission system for a drilling machine (Fig. 1), the transmission system comprising: a drive pump (60; Fig. 6); a motor (64) driven by the drive pump (60); a first fluid line (66) that fluidly couples the motor (64) with the drive pump (60); a second fluid line (68) that fluidly couples the motor (64) with the drive pump (60); a charge pump (72) in fluid communication with the drive pump (60); a fluid charge line (82; Fig. 6) that fluidly couples the charge pump (72) with the drive pump (60); and an accumulator (70), wherein, in an event of a change in a load on the transmission system, the accumulator is adapted to supply additional fluid towards at least the second fluid line (68) to prevent a reduction in a pressure operating level of at least one of the drive pump and the motor (col. 4, lines 41-57); a frame (Fig. 1); and at least one drilling component (drilling pipe; col. 1, lines 20-24), but fails to disclose wherein the accumulator is disposed in the fluid charge line and in selective fluid communication with the first fluid line and the second fluid line. Chatterjea discloses a transmission comprising a drive pump (10; Fig. 1), a motor (20), a charge pump (30) with a charge line (35, 65) that fluidly couples the charge pump (30) with the drive pump (10), and an accumulator (80) disposed in the fluid charge line (35, 65) and in selective fluid communication with first and second fluid lines (16, 16’) for the purpose of supplying and maintaining proper pressure in the fluid lines. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have provided Loyd accumulator disposed in the fluid charge line and in selective fluid communication with first and second fluid lines, as taught by Chatterjea in order to maintain a proper pressure in the fluid lines during operation of the drill. Regarding claims 2 and 11, Chatterjea also discloses a valve (60; Fig. 1) disposed upstream of the drive pump (10) and adapted to provide fluid communication between the fluid charge line (35, 65) and the drive pump (10). Regarding claims 3 and 12, Chatterjea discloses a first supply line (as shown in annotated Fig. 1 below) that provides fluid communication between the first fluid line (16) and the fluid charge line (65), wherein the first valve (60) is disposed in the first supply line, and wherein the first valve (60) allows selective fluid flow from the fluid charge line (65) towards the first fluid line (16) via the first supply line. [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image1.png 850 588 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claims 4 and 13, Chatterjea discloses a second valve (60’) disposed upstream of the drive pump (10) and adapted to provide fluid communication between the fluid charge line (65) and the drive pump (10). Regarding claims 5 and 14, Chatterjea discloses a second supply line (as shown in annotated Fig. 1 above) that provides fluid communication between the second fluid line (16’) and the fluid charge line (65), wherein the second valve (60’) is disposed in the second supply line, and wherein the second valve allows selective fluid flow from the fluid charge line towards the second fluid line via the second supply line (as shown in annotated Fig. 1 above). Regarding claims 6 and 15, Chatterjea discloses wherein, upon the supply of the additional fluid by the accumulator, the pressure in at least one of the first fluid line and the second fluid line is at least equal to a charge pressure in the fluid charge line (note that charge pump 30 is a constant displacement pump and one of its functions is to replenish fluid that has been lost though leak). Regarding claims 7 and 16, Loyd discloses wherein the drive pump (60) includes a bi-directional pump (as shown in Fig. 6). Chatterjea also discloses wherein the drive pump is a bi-directional pump (10; Fig. 1). Regarding claims 8-9 and 17, Loyd discloses wherein the motor is adapted to operate at least one drilling component (54) of the drilling machine (Fig. 2); wherein the at least one drilling component includes a drill pipe (col. 1, lines 20-24; Fig. 1). Regarding claim 18, Loyd discloses a method of operating a transmission system of a drilling machine (Fig. 1), the method comprising: operating a drive pump (60) of the transmission system, wherein the transmission system further includes a charge pump (72) and a fluid charge line (82) that are in fluid communication with the drive pump (60); operating a motor (64) of the transmission system based on operation of the drive pump, wherein the transmission system further includes a first fluid line (66) that fluidly couples the motor with the drive pump and a second fluid line (68) that fluidly couples the motor with the drive pump; and operating, in an event of a change in a load on the transmission system, an accumulator (70) of the transmission system to supply additional fluid towards at least one of the first fluid line (66) and the second fluid line (680 to prevent a reduction in a pressure in at least one of the first fluid line and the second fluid line below a recommended operating level of at least one of the drive pump and the motor, but fails to disclose wherein the accumulator is disposed in the fluid charge line. Chatterjea discloses a transmission system comprising an accumulator (80) disposed on a fluid charge line (35, 65) of a charge pump (30; Fig. 1) for the purposes of supplying and maintaining a desired pressure to the system during operation of the machine, avoiding cavitation. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have provided Loyd’s accumulator disposed on the fluid charge line of the tcharge pump, as taught by Chatterjea in order to supply and maintaine a desired pressure to the system during operation of the machine. Regarding claim 19, Chatterjea discloses wherein, upon the supply of the additional fluid by the accumulator, the pressure in at least one of the first fluid line and the second fluid line is at least equal to a charge pressure in the fluid charge line (note that charge pump 30 is a constant displacement pump and one of its functions is to replenish fluid that has been lost though leak). Regarding claim 20, Loyd discloses operating, by the motor (Fig. 6), at least one drilling component (i.e. drilling pipe) of the drilling machine based on the operation of the motor (col. 1, lines 20-24). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHELLE LOPEZ whose telephone number is (571)272-4464. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday 8:30 am to 4:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anna Kinsaul can be reached at (571) 270 - 1926. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHELLE LOPEZ/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 14, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599379
DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR DETECTING TISSUE AND FOREIGN OBJECTS DURING A SURGICAL OPERATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600023
POWERED TOOL FOR REPAIRING TIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12577834
HYDRAULIC ACTUATOR FOR CONTROLLING OPERATIONS OF DRILLING MACHINES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569959
FASTENING TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12569266
STRAIN AND COMPRESSION FORCE MEASUREMENT FEATURES FOR SURGICAL STAPLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+11.8%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1103 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month