Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/208,981

SEALING MATERIAL SUPPLY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112§Other
Filed
May 15, 2025
Priority
Oct 11, 2024 — JP 2024-179296
Examiner
MUSSER, BARBARA J
Art Unit
1746
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
600 granted / 846 resolved
+5.9% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
877
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
48.8%
+8.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
§112
28.1%
-11.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 846 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. It is unclear what is meant by the term “half-cut” as it is not a term of art, nor is it defined by applicant. The only definition examiner could find is drunkard, which is obviously not what the term means in the claim. For the purposes of examination, this is considered to be a cutting device. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a2 as being anticipated by Elsharawy et al.(US Publication 2025/0332036). Elsharawy et al. discloses a device for splicing two web comprising a pair of main body portions which sandwich old and new webs(120-128; Figure 1A), a welding portion in each of the main body portions(122, 124), and a blade in each of the main body portions which cuts surplus web(120, 128) wherein the welding occurs at the same time as the splicing.[0007] Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BARBARA J MUSSER whose telephone number is (571)272-1222. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30-4:30 M-Th; 7:30-3:30 second Fridays. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Orlando can be reached at 571-270-5038. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BARBARA J. MUSSER Primary Examiner Art Unit 1746 /BARBARA J MUSSER/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1746
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 15, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12697788
Improved layup process for wind turbine blade manufacturing
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12679065
PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION OF FOAM LAMINATE PRODUCT
10y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680064
DISPOSABLE CELL CULTURE BAG
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679594
PREVENTION OF INTERLOCKING OF NESTABLE CONTAINERS
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679560
Method For Joining A Window Frame To A Fuselage Skin Of An Aircraft Made Of A Fiber Composite Material
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+27.3%)
3y 0m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 846 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month