Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/210,659

PACKING MEMBER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 16, 2025
Priority
Jun 04, 2024 — JP 2024-090690
Examiner
CASTRIOTTA, JENNIFER
Art Unit
3733
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Kyocera Document Solutions Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
441 granted / 707 resolved
-7.6% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
754
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
§112
30.4%
-9.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 707 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 3 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 3 currently states “the third shock-absorbing portion includes, outside a side edge of the base portion to which the side wall portions are not connected, engagement segments extending toward a side of the base portion facing housing space, the engagement segments engaging with said side edge of the base portion.” The Examiner believes the claim is intended to state “the third shock-absorbing portion includes, outside a side edge of the base portion to which the side wall portions are not connected, engagement segments extending toward a side of the base portion facing the housing space, the engagement segments engaging with said side edge of the base portion.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Itano (US 11623812). Regarding Claim 1 Itano teaches a packing member (below – Fig. 3 and 5) formed by bending a single sheet material (Fig. 3) so as to have a housing space, comprising: a base portion (1) in a rectangular shape; a pair of side wall portions (2) formed by being bent substantially perpendicularly from a circumferential edge of the base portion (@ F1), the pair of side wall portions being arranged to face each other along a first direction across the housing space; a pair of first shock-absorbing portions (3) formed by being bent substantially perpendicularly from circumferential edges of the pair of side wall portions (@ F2), the pair of first shock-absorbing portions extending outward of the side wall portions along the first direction; a pair of second shock-absorbing portions (4) formed by being bent substantially perpendicularly from circumferential edges of the pair of first shock-absorbing portions (@ F3), the pair of second shock- absorbing portions extending substantially perpendicularly to the side wall portions along the first direction and along a direction toward the base portion; and a third shock-absorbing portion (5) connected between the pair of second shock-absorbing portions and formed substantially in a V-shape as seen from a second direction facing the base portion, the third shock-absorbing portion being arranged adjacently outside the housing space with respect to the base portion, wherein the base portion has a pair of through holes (1x) arranged away from each other along the first direction, and the pair of second shock-absorbing portions have a pair of projections (4x) inserted in the pair of through holes (Col. 3, Ln. 52 – Col. 6, Ln. 59). PNG media_image1.png 342 387 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 436 432 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 2 Itano teaches the pair of through holes (1x) respectively extend from boundaries between the pair of side wall portions (2) and the base portion (1) into the base portion, as can be seen in Fig. 3 above. Regarding Claim 3 Itano teaches the third shock-absorbing portion (5) includes, outside a side edge of the base portion to which the side wall portions are not connected, engagement segments (5a) extending toward a side of the base portion (1) facing the housing space, the engagement segments engaging with said side edge of the base portion, as can be seen in Fig. 5 above. Regarding Claim 4 Itano teaches a fourth shock-absorbing portion (6) arranged outside the housing space with respect to a third direction orthogonal the first and second directions, the fourth shock-absorbing portion extending along the third direction and being formed substantially in a V-shape as seen from the third direction, as can be seen in Fig. 5 above. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Further pertinent prior art includes but is not limited to that which is listed in the attached Notice of References Cited. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JENNIFER CASTRIOTTA whose telephone number is (571)270-5279. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Jenness can be reached at (571) 270-5055. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JENNIFER CASTRIOTTA/Examiner, Art Unit 3733 /LAURA E. PARKER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3733
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 16, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12759755
CAN END
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12759776
CLOSURE, CONTAINER, AND ASSEMBLY THEREOF
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12752966
COLLAPSIBLE SHIPPING CONTAINERS
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12747066
Container Grip Panel With Improved Side Load
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742516
COMPRESSED GAS STORAGE TANK, SYSTEM AND METHOD
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+29.0%)
2y 6m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 707 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month