Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/212,994

VEHICLE MOTION CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 20, 2025
Examiner
TO, TOAN C
Art Unit
3614
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Magna International Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allow Rate
903 granted / 986 resolved
+39.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -4% lift
Without
With
+-3.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
998
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§102
52.2%
+12.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 986 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-9, and 11-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Anderson (U.S. 11,021,033). Regarding claims 1-9, Anderson discloses an active suspension control system for a vehicle, comprising: an unsprung mass (vehicle wheel) coupled to a sprung mass (vehicle chassis) by a spring (1-124); an actuator (1-116) disposed between the unsprung mass (vehicle wheels) and the sprung mass (vehicle chassis) and configured to apply a force (damping force) therebetween; a controller (1-200) in functional communication with the actuator (1-116) and configured to cause the actuator (1-116) to vary the force (damping force) based on a force command signal (commanded force), wherein the controller (1-200) is configured to determine the force command signal based on at least one of: a linear quadratic control technique (see column 263, lines 15-30); or an impedance control technique (see column 251, lines 45-50) using a low-pass filtered actual-value signal (see fig. 286, lines 45-50), wherein the controller (1-200) is configured to determine the force command signal based on the linear quadratic control technique (see column 263, lines 15-30, wherein the controller (1-200) is configured to determine the force command signal based on the impedance control technique using the low-pass filtered actual-value signal (see fig. 286, lines 45-50), wherein actual-value signal represents a linear distance between the unsprung mass and the sprung mass (displacement sensor provide information between the vehicle chassis and wheel such as distance), wherein the spring (1-124) and the actuator (1-116) are the only physical connections between the sprung mass (vehicle chassis) and the unsprung mass (vehicle wheels), wherein the unsprung mass includes a wheel of the vehicle, wherein the vehicle includes a plurality of wheels, wherein the actuator (1-116) is one of a plurality of actuators (1-116), with each actuator (1-116) of the plurality of actuators being coupled to a corresponding wheel of the plurality of wheels, and wherein the controller (1-200) is in functional communication with each actuator (1-116) of the plurality of actuators (1-126) to cause each actuator to vary a corresponding application of force, wherein the actuator (1-116) includes at least one actuatable component for controlling the force applied, wherein the at least one actuatable component includes each of: the motor, the clutch (see column 143, lines 43-45), and the brake (see entire document). Regarding claims 11-19, Anderson discloses a method for controlling an active suspension control system for a vehicle, comprising: applying a force (damping force), by an actuator (1-116), between an unsprung mass (vehicle wheels) and a sprung mass (vehicle chassis), wherein the unsprung mass is coupled to the sprung mass by a spring (1-124); determining, by a controller (1-200), a force command (commanded force) signal based on at least one of: a linear quadratic control technique, or an impedance control technique (see column 263, lines 15-30) using a low-pass filtered actual- value signal (see fig. 286, lines 45-50); and communicating, the force command signal to the actuator (1-126) to cause the actuator to vary the force, wherein the controller (1-200) is configured to determine the force command signal based on the linear quadratic control technique (see column 263, lines 15-30), wherein the controller is configured to determine the force command signal based on the impedance control technique using the low-pass filtered actual-value signal (see fig. 286, lines 45-50); wherein actual-value signal represents a linear distance between the unsprung mass and the sprung mass (displacement sensor provide information between the vehicle chassis and wheel such as distance), wherein the spring (1-124) and the actuator (1-116) are the only physical connections between the sprung mass and the unsprung mass, wherein the unsprung mass includes a wheel of the vehicle, wherein the vehicle includes a plurality of wheels, wherein the actuator is one of a plurality of actuators (1116), with each actuator (1-116) of the plurality of actuators being coupled to a corresponding wheel of the plurality of wheels, and wherein the controller (1-200) is in functional communication with each actuator of the plurality of actuators (1-116) to cause each actuator to vary a corresponding application of force, wherein the at least one actuatable component includes each of: the motor, the clutch (see column 143, lines 43-45), and the brake (see entire document). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10 and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Anderson discloses every element of the invention as discussed above except that at least one of the clutch and the brake is operable based on changing a viscosity of a magnetorheological (MR) fluid. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TOAN C TO whose telephone number is (571)272-6677. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5, Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JASON D SHANSKE can be reached at (571)270-5985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TOAN C TO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3614 February 6, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 20, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600189
CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VEHICLE SUSPENSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589624
PITCH AND ROLL CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589625
VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583279
CONTROL VALVE DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING DAMPING CHARACTERISTICS, AND HYDRAULIC FLOW-THROUGH SOLENOID VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583277
DAMPER CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (-3.8%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 986 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month