Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 19/213,389

Communication Method for Calibrating Sensor, Sensor and Sensor Assembly

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
May 20, 2025
Priority
May 20, 2024 — CN 202410627527.0
Examiner
LUGO, DAVID B
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Measurement Specialties (China) Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
575 granted / 730 resolved
+18.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
749
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§103
51.8%
+11.8% vs TC avg
§102
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 730 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Objections Claim 4 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 4, line 2, “senor” should be --sensor--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 2-10, 12, 14, 15, 17 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Regarding claims 2, 14 and 17, those claims each recite: “generating the command signal in the form of a voltage waveform change.” However, as this “generating” step is part of a “processing step [that] includes analyzing, by the sensor, the command signal after the sensor receives the command signal,” it is unclear whether the generated command signal in the recited “generating” step is a new command signal or refers to the original command signal modulated by the calibration device. Accordingly, the claims raise an ambiguity that render the claims indefinite. Claim 9 recites “the current change signal” in line 1. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 11, 13 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Cleary U.S. Patent No. 6,678,185. Regarding claims 1, 13 and 16, Cleary discloses a communication method for calibrating a sensor (i.e. temperature sensor circuit 2 in conjunction with interpreter 22 and pad cell 36) based on a power supply wire of the sensor, the method comprising: modulating, by a calibration device (i.e. external to shown calibration circuit 3 – see col. 2, ll. 31-34), a command signal to be issued to the sensor into a voltage change signal as power supply terminal 5 is modulated with a command signal supplied to the pad cell 36; coupling the voltage change signal onto the power supply wire of the sensor (i.e. voltage Vdd on the power supply terminal 5 is modulated with a command signal – see col. 9, ll. 26-27); receiving, by the sensor, the voltage change signal from the power supply wire (see Figs. 1, 2, 4); decoupling and demodulating the voltage change signal with the sensor to obtain the command signal (col. 2 ll. 55-62); processing, by the sensor, the command signal after the sensor receives the command signal as decoders decode the data signals from the interface circuit and a state machine controls performs subsequent processing (col. 8, ll. 10-18); and sending a corresponding command reply back to the calibration device as the state machine 33 of the interpreter circuit 22 controls operation of the calibration circuit 3 in response to the data input signal (col. 8, ll. 15-18). Regarding claim 11, Cleary further discloses that the sensor is a voltage analog sensor or a digital sensor (col. 9, ll. 26-35). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Soenen et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,671,183 disclose a method for programming calibration information at a final test without increasing pin count. Hourne U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2014/0355699 disclose a device for communication between an electronic module and a sensor using a power supply line. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to David B. Lugo whose telephone number is (571)272-3043. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 9-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hannah Wang can be reached at 571-272-9018. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID B LUGO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2631 9/19/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 20, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750790
Indication of Reduced Output Power in Beam Report
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750121
POLARIZATION AND ANTENNA PANEL CONFIGURATION AND COMMUNICATION DIVERSITY CONFIGURATION
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750089
COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND COMMUNICATION SIGNAL GENERATION METHOD
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744691
NETWORK ASSISTED TIME REVERSAL RADIO FREQUENCY SENSING
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12726291
TRANSMISSION METHOD AND RECEIVER
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+2.6%)
2y 5m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 730 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month