Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/213,568

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INFERRING TRANSACTION BASED ON DATA DETECTED FROM RFID ELEMENTS AT A SMART GAME TABLE

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
May 20, 2025
Priority
Jul 14, 2018 — provisional 62/698,047 +5 more
Examiner
ELISCA, PIERRE E
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Walker Digital Table Systems LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1412 granted / 1565 resolved
+20.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1597
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
§103
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§102
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
§112
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1565 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. This communication is to response to Application No. 19/213,568 filed on 05/20/2025. 3. Claims 1-20 are currently pending and have been examined. 4. This application is a continuation of U.S. application No. 18/439,565 filed on 02/12/2024 now U.S Patent 12,333,903 See MPEP 201.07. In accordance with MPEP 609.02 A.2 and MPEP 2001.06 (b) (last paragraph), the Examiner has reviewed and considered the prior art cited in the Parent Application. Also in accordance with MPEP 2001.06 (b) (last paragraph), all documents cited or considered ‘of record’ in the Parent Application are now considered cited or ‘of record’ in this application. Additionally, Applicant(s) are reminded that a listing of the information cited or ‘of record’ in the Patent Application need not be resubmitted in this application unless Applicants desire the information to be printed on a patent issuing from this application. See MPEP 609.02 A. 2. Finally, Applicants are reminded that the prosecution history of the Patent Application is relevant in this application. Information Disclosure Statement 5. IDS filed on 08/14/2025. Double Patenting 6. The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the "right to exclude" granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. See In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970);and, In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent is shown to be commonly owned with this application. See 37 CFR 1.130(b). Effective January 1, 1994, a registered attorney or agent of record may sign a terminal disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with 37 CFR 3.73(b). Claim 1 of US application no. 19/213,568 recites: A non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions executable by a game controller operable to facilitate transactions at a physical table system, wherein the physical table system comprises: A physical table including a dealer area of the table on which a dealer of the physical table places gaming elements corresponding to a transaction being conducted on the physical table and a plurality of respective player areas of the physical table on which players place gaming elements corresponding to transactions in which the players are involved; and at least one detecting component operable to detect each gaming element being placed within a read area thereof and to read data of the gaming element; and wherein the instructions comprise instructions for directing the game controller to: Determine, based on data received from a particular detecting component of the at least one detecting component, that a particular at least one gaming element has been placed on the area of the physical table corresponding to the particular detecting component; Identify, for the particular at least one gaming element detected by the particular detecting component, a status corresponding to the particular at least one gaming element; Identify at least one of stage of a game being played on the physical table or a state of the physical table; Automatically initiate, based on the status of the at least one gaming element and at least one of the at least one of a stage of a game being played at the physical table or the state of the physical table, a first transaction mode at the physical table. Claim 1 of US Pat. No. 12,333,903 recites: A non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions executable by a game controller operable to facilitate transactions at a physical table system, wherein the physical table system comprises: A physical table including a dealer area of the table on which a dealer of the physical table places gaming elements corresponding to a transaction being conducted on the physical table and a plurality of respective player areas of the physical table on which players place gaming elements corresponding to transactions in which the players are involved; and A plurality of detecting components operable to detect each gaming element being placed within a read area thereof and to read data of the gaming element; and wherein the instructions comprise instructions for directing the game controller to: determine, based on data received from a particular detecting component, that a particular at least one gaming element has been placed on the area of the physical table corresponding to the particular detecting component; Identify, for the particular at least one gaming element detected by the particular detecting component, a status corresponding to the particular at least one gaming element; Identify at least one of (i) an event corresponding to the physical table; and (ii) a first type of transaction currently being conducted at the physical table; Infer, based on the status of the at least one gaming element and at least one of the event and the first type of transaction, that a second type of transaction is being initiated at the physical table; and; automatically enter a transaction mode corresponding to the second type of transaction. The difference between claim 1 of application no. 19/9/213,568 and claim 1 of US Pat No. 12,333,903 is the limitation of: “automatically initiate, based on the status of the at least one gaming element and at least one of the at least one of a stage of a game being played at the physical table or the state of the physical table, a first transaction mode at the physical table”. Claims 1-20 are rejected under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Pat. No.12,333,903. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to those in possession of the invention to observe all the features claimed in instant claims 1-20 are being disclosed by claims 1-20 of U.S. Pat. No.12,333,903. Therefore, one of ordinary skill in the art would have realized that by adding the limitations of: ”automatically initiate, based on the status of the at least one gaming element and at least one of the at least one of a stage of a game being played at the physical table or the state of the physical table, a first transaction mode at the physical table” is an obvious expedient since the remaining elements perform the same functions as before. In re Karlson, 136 USPQ 184 (CCPA 1963. Conclusion 7. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the Examiner should be directed to PIERRE E ELISCA whose telephone number is (571) 272-6706. The Examiner can normally be reached on Monday -Thursday; 6:30AM- 7:30PM. Hoteler. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the Examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner’s supervisor, Hu Kang can be reached on 571 270 1344. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PIERRE E ELISCA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 20, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770460
RESPONSIBLE GAMING TRANSFERS OF FUNDS BETWEEN AN ELECTRONIC GAMING MACHINE AND A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION ACCOUNT UTILIZING A CASHLESS PAYMENT TERMINAL
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12749373
WAGER SELL BACK OPTION
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749374
REVENUE SHARING FOR USER-GENERATED VIRTUAL WAGERING GAMES AND GAMING ENVIRONMENTS
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734441
GAME DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT SYSTEM, GAME DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM HAVING STORED THEREIN GAME DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT PROGRAM
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734446
NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+6.3%)
2y 3m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1565 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month