Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/213,648

CONNECTION SYSTEM FOR PLUNGER PUMP DEVICE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
May 20, 2025
Examiner
BINDA, GREGORY JOHN
Art Unit
3679
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Yantai Jereh Oilfield Services Group Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
1456 granted / 1798 resolved
+29.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
1839
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§102
39.5%
-0.5% vs TC avg
§112
36.4%
-3.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1798 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Response to Amendment In the claim listing filed December 19, 2025, withdrawn claim 2 is provided with an incorrect status identifier. Election/Restrictions Claims 2 & 8-9 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant elected the connection system shown in Figs. 2-5 & 14 (Species I) and timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on September 3, 2025. In the amendment filed December 19, 2025, applicant argues claim 2 was not withdrawn by the applicant, and that paragraph 0052 shows claim 2 reads on the elected species. However, an applicant does not withdraw (or rejoin) a claim. Pursuant to an election of species requirement, applicant is required to identified the claims that read on the elected species, but only the Office. i.e. the examiner, withdraws or rejoins claims. As for paragraph 0052, it pertains to a situation where the connector 2 is used to connecting multiple gearbox engaging portions, which is not the situation at claim 2 where the connector 2 is used to connect a single gearbox interface to a plunger pump device. Drawings The drawings are objected to because external teeth 22, 24 are not drawn as crowned teeth, i.e. curved tooth profile, as described at paragraph 0046 and recited in claim 1. In the amendment filed December 19, 2025, applicant argues that the drawings do not need to show crowned teeth. However, the drawings must show every feature recited in the claims that can be shown. See 37 CFR 1.83(a). Applicant further argues that it does not have “a good way” to illustrate crowned teeth. However, the prior art doesn’t appear to have had any problem illustrating crowned teeth. Applicant is advised to employ the services of a competent patent draftsperson. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claims 1, 3, 4-5, 12 & 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kraeling, US 3,243,973. At Figs. 1-2, Kraeling shows a connection system that could be used for a plunger pump device, comprising: a connector, comprising a hollow shaft (34, 34) and a first engaging portion (37) and a second engaging portion (37) provided at opposite end portions of the shaft; a reduction gearbox interface (2-4), comprising a third engaging portion (24); and a plunger pump device interface (5-7), comprising a fourth engaging portion (24), wherein: the first engaging portion engages with the third engaging portion to form a first engaging pair, and the second engaging portion engages with the fourth engaging portion to form a second engaging pair, the first engaging portion and the third engaging portion are respectively external teeth (38) and internal teeth (25) of the first engaging pair, the second engaging portion and the fourth engaging portion are respectively external teeth (38) and internal teeth (25) of the second engaging pair, the external teeth of the first engaging pair are configured as crowned teeth (see Fig.2), and/or the external teeth of the second engaging pair are configured as crowned teeth (see Fig. 2), and other internal teeth of the first engaging pair and the second engaging pair are configured as straight teeth (see Fig. 1), such that straight teeth (25, 25) are engaged with crowned teeth (38, 38) for both the first and second engaging pairs, wherein a limiting mechanism (28) is an L-shaped plate and comprises a first leg (the portion of plate 28 through which bolt 30 passes) and a second leg (the portion of plate 28 holding seal 32) perpendicular to the first leg. In the amendment filed December 19, 2025, applicant argues that internal teeth (25) are shown as crowned, not straight, in Fig. 2. However, Fig. 2 does not show internal teeth (25), but Fig. 1 (see also Figs. 10-12) clearly show the internal teeth 25 are straight. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 10-11 & 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kraeling. Kraeling shows a connection system comprising every limitation of the claims but does not expressly disclose allowable axial displacement is from 2 to 8 mm. However, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to have the allowable axial displacement from 2 to 8 mm, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. In re Kulling, 897 F.2d 1147, 14 USPQ2d 1056 (Fed. Cir. 1990). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-7 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion As allowable subject matter has been indicated, applicant's reply must either comply with all formal requirements or specifically traverse each requirement not complied with. See 37 CFR 1.111(b) and MPEP § 707.07(a). THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Greg Binda whose telephone number is (571)272-7077. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30-5:30 et. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Troutman can be reached at 571-270-3654. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Greg Binda/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3679
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 20, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 19, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 06, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601379
CONSTANT VELOCITY JOINT AND DRIVESHAFT INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12577977
INTEGRATED COMPOSITE DRIVE SHAFTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571431
FLEXIBLE METALLIC COUPLINGS FOR DRIVE SHAFTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571432
UNIVERSAL JOINT ASSEMBLY FOR SURGICAL TOOLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12560205
CONSTANT VELOCITY JOINT AND DRIVESHAFT INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+11.7%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1798 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month