Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 19/213,932

PORTABLE LIGHT APPARATUS, CHARGING DEVICE FOR A PORTABLE LIGHT APPARATUS AND CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A PORTABLE LIGHT APPARATUS

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
May 20, 2025
Priority
Aug 31, 2022 — divisional of 12/332,504
Examiner
COLLINS, RAVEN
Art Unit
3735
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Healyan GmbH
OA Round
2 (Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
610 granted / 974 resolved
-7.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1022
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
61.2%
+21.2% vs TC avg
§102
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§112
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 974 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is written in response to the amendment filed 07/21/2026 Claims 1 and 5 have been amended and claims 21-22 have been added Claims 1, 3-13 and 15-22 are presented for examination This action is Final Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3-7 and 9-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bristol et al. (US 2022/0231523). Claim 1. Bristol discloses a charging case 100 for a portable light apparatus which is configured to be worn by a user, the charging case comprising at least: - a housing 100 comprising a first housing part 108 having a cavity 114 in which the portable light apparatus is insertable to be held and protected and a second housing part 110 configured as a lid to close or open the cavity (fig. 1), and - a charging operating device 102 arranged in the housing, - wherein the charging operating device is configured to charge a battery of the portable light apparatus when inserted in the cavity and when the cavity of the first housing part is fully shut by the second housing ([0029], [0056]; fig. 9-11). Claim 3. Bristol discloses the charging case according to claim 1, wherein the cavity is formed such that an insert direction of the portable light apparatus is defined for the user (fig. 2). Claim 4. Bristol discloses the charging case according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the housing parts comprises a holding element 104 configured to guide the user to insert the light apparatus and to removably hold the portable light apparatus in place in the cavity [0030]. Claim 6. Bristol discloses the charging case according to claim 1, wherein the housing comprises charging electronics for charging the portable light apparatus and at least one charging port 412 to establish a temporary electrical connection to the portable light apparatus (fig. 7-8). Claim 7. Bristol discloses the charging case according to claim 1, wherein the housing comprises at least one rechargeable battery [0108]. Claim 9. Bristol discloses the charging case according to claim 1, wherein the housing comprises at least one display device 904 to display a battery status of the charging case and/or the portable light apparatus [0054]. Claim 10. Bristol discloses a chargeable system comprising at least a charging case according to claim 1 and a portable light apparatus which is configured to be worn by a user (abstract). Claim 11. Bristol discloses the chargeable system according to claim 10, wherein the portable light apparatus are glasses 300 comprising: - a front frame 308 to house eyeglasses and a pair of side frames 312 connected to the front frame, - an operating device 302 having at least a battery and at least one main electronic part and at least one light device configured to emit light towards the eye- glasses and/or the user's eyes [0039], [0054], - wherein the battery is configured to supply energy to the light device via the main electronic part, - wherein the main electronic part comprises a number of interfaces 304 to couple with the charging case (fig. 3). Claim 12. Bristol discloses the chargeable system according to claim 10, wherein the holding element of the charging case is a magnet element which is arranged in an area of one of the housing parts configured to correspond to a location of a counter holding element located on the front frame and/or the side frames of the portable light apparatus [0026-0027]. Claim 13. Bristol discloses the chargeable system according to claim 10, wherein the cavity is formed such that the insert direction of the portable light apparatus is defined and the insert direction refers to a specific folding configuration of the side frames of the portable light apparatus (fig. 12-13). Claim 14. Bristol discloses A chargeable system comprising at least a charging case according to claim 2 and a portable light apparatus which is configured to be worn by a user (abstract). Claim 15. Bristol discloses the chargeable system comprising at least a charging case according to claim 3 and a portable light apparatus which is configured to be worn by a user (abstract). Claim 16. Bristol discloses the chargeable system comprising at least a charging case according to claim 4 and a portable light apparatus which is configured to be worn by a user (abstract). Claim 17. Bristol discloses the chargeable system comprising at least a charging case according to claim 5 and a portable light apparatus which is configured to be worn by a user (abstract). Claim 18. Bristol discloses the chargeable system comprising at least a charging case according to claim 6 and a portable light apparatus which is configured to be worn by a user (abstract). Claim 19. Bristol discloses the chargeable system comprising at least a charging case according to claim 7 and a portable light apparatus which is configured to be worn by a user (abstract). Claim 20. Bristol discloses the chargeable system comprising at least a charging case according to claim 8 and a portable light apparatus which is configured to be worn by a user (abstract). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 8 and 21-22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bristol et al. (US 2022/0231523) in view of Lam (US 2005/0194267). Claim 8. Bristol discloses the charging case according to claim 1, but fails to disclose the storage of multiple devices. Lam teaches wherein the housing comprises at least one separate compartment 38 for storing different exchangeable eyeglasses, the separate compartment is arranged below or above the cavity in which the portable light apparatus is insertable ([0048]; fig. 2B). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date of the invention to modify the housing of Bristol to include the storage compartment of Lam to assist the user in carrying needed accessories for use with other stored products. Claim 21. Bristol discloses a charging case 100 for a portable light apparatus which is configured to be worn by a user, the charging case comprising at least: - a housing 100 comprising a first housing part 108 having a cavity 114 in which the portable light apparatus is insertable to be held and protected and a second housing part 110 configured as a lid to close or open the cavity (fig. 1), and - a charging operating device 102 arranged in the housing, - wherein the charging operating device is configured to charge a battery of the portable light apparatus when inserted in the cavity and when the cavity of the first housing part is fully shut by the second housing ([0029]; fig. 1). Bristol fails to disclose a display device. Lam discloses wherein the housing comprises a display device 18 to display a battery status of the charging case and the portable light apparatus to give visual feedback about the charging status of the portable light apparatus and a battery of the charging case ([0045]; fig. 1A,B). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date of the invention to modify the outer housing surface of Bristol to include the display device of Lam to display and notify the user of the status of the stored item status. Claim 22. Bristol discloses a charging case 100 for a portable light apparatus which is configured to be worn by a user, the charging case comprising at least: - a housing 100 comprising a first housing part 108 having a cavity 114 in which the portable light apparatus is insertable to be held and protected and a second housing part 110 configured as a lid to close or open the cavity (fig. 1), and - a charging operating device 102 arranged in the housing, - wherein the charging operating device is configured to charge a battery of the portable light apparatus when inserted in the cavity and when the cavity of the first housing part is fully shut by the second housing ([0029]; fig. 1). Bristol fails to disclose multiple compartments. Lam teaches wherein the housing comprises a separate compartment 19 below or above the cavity configured for storing a number of different exchangeable eyeglasses for the portable light apparatus ([0045]; fig. 1B). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date of the invention to modify the charging case of Bristol to include the accessory compartment of Lam to allow product-related items to remain together. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 07/21/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Claim 1, Bristol (US 2022/0231523): The rejection has been updated to reflect the claim amendments. Figure 9 best shows the case in the closed configuration with the first and second housings joined. Charging indicator 904 signals charging once the battery is connected and the lid is closed. Applicant has not included claim language that teaches the second housing activating the charge of the battery. Currently, the battery is charged once the object enters the cavity first housing and remains (battery) in the charging capacity once the second housing part shuts the case. Applicant is advised to include the claim language based on the argued interpretation. The rejection is respectfully maintained. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAVEN COLLINS whose telephone number is (571)270-1672. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30am to 5:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ANTHONY STASHICK can be reached at 571-272-4561. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAVEN COLLINS/Examiner, Art Unit 3735 /Anthony D Stashick/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 20, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 21, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767415
WAFER CONTAINER AND PURGE SYSTEM
4y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12767416
CONTAINER FOR FOOD PRESERVATION AND PRESENTATION
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12752993
ARTICLE CARRIER AND BLANK THEREFOR
4y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12752163
Golf Bag
1y 1m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12747093
DUAL STORAGE AND DISPOSAL DEVICE AND METHOD OF USE
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 11m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 974 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month