Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 19/213,968

ACTUATOR ASSEMBLY FOR A HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
May 20, 2025
Examiner
NGUYEN, DUSTIN T
Art Unit
3745
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Wipro Enterprises Pvt, LTD.
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
332 granted / 460 resolved
+2.2% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
493
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
37.8%
-2.2% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
32.7%
-7.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 460 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see remarks, filed 12/19/2025, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-10 under U.S.C. 103, U.S.C. 112(b), and the objections have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejections and objections have been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of applicant’s amendments to the claims raising new U.S.C. 112(b) issues due to not fully incorporating the intervening limitations of claim 2 into claim with the allowable claim 3 limitations. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 4 recites the limitation "the main cylinder cap end cover" in lines 3-4, etc.. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. This structure was established in claim 2, but claim 4 has been amended to depend from claim 1 which does not depend from claim 2. Claim 5 recites the limitation "the main cylinder rod eye" in lines 3-4, etc.. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. This structure was established in claim 2, but claim 4 has been amended to depend from claim 1 which does not depend from claim 2. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the main cylinder piston rod" in line 6-7, “the main cylinder cap end cover” in line 12, “the main cylinder head end cover” in line 15. There is insufficient antecedent basis for these limitations in the claim. These structures are established in claim 2, but claim 6 has been amended to depend from claim 1 which does not depend from claim 2. Claim 9 recites the limitation "the main cylinder cap end side port" and "the plunger cylinder cap end side port". There is insufficient antecedent basis for these limitations in the claim. These structures are established in claim 6, but claim 9 does not depend from claim 6. Claim 9 recites "the main cylinder piston rod". There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. This structure is established in claim 2, but claim 9 does not depend from claim 2. Claim 10 recites "the main cylinder piston rod". There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. This structure is established in claim 2, but claim 10 does not depend from claim 2. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-2, 7-8 are allowed. Claims 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art does not disclose nor render obvious an actuator assembly including the combination of limitations as recited in claim 1. The dependent claims are allowable because they depend from allowed claim 1. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Dustin T Nguyen whose telephone number is (571)270-0163. The examiner can normally be reached M - F: 8:00am - 4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathaniel E. Wiehe can be reached at (571) 272-8648. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DUSTIN T NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3745 January 12, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 20, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Dec 19, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 12, 2026
Final Rejection — §112
Apr 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600482
ACTUATOR, SAFETY DEVICE, AND FLYING BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601152
A MACHINE COMPRISING A SWING-TRAVEL HYDRAULIC SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589489
PRESSURIZED SLEEVE FOR ROUTING OF LINEAR COMPONENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12560185
WORKING CYLINDER, IN PARTICULAR A HYDRAULIC WORKING CYLINDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12546296
CYLINDER IN PARTICULAR FOR HYDROGEN TANK CYCLING FACILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+18.0%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 460 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month