Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/216,426

Funeral Service Container

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 22, 2025
Priority
May 23, 2024 — provisional 63/651,308
Examiner
MILLER, WILLIAM L
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Heaven'S Gain Ministries
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
1381 granted / 1749 resolved
+19.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1771
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
36.5%
-3.5% vs TC avg
§102
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
§112
46.6%
+6.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1749 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by McCoy et al. (US#5956825). Regarding claim 1, McCoy discloses a funeral service container 10 comprising: a casket 20, the casket having a lid 40 hingedly connected thereto via at least one hinge located along one side 30 thereof (col. 7, lines 31-33), and the lid being hingedly movable to open and to close the casket; a box 25 residing in the casket, the box having top edges 68 thereof at “about the same” vertical height as top edges of the casket defining the top of the opening 50; and a frame 27 residing over and spanning the top edges of the casket and the box via portion 29 of the frame, thereby to cover the top edges thereof completely therearound the box and the casket (col. 7, lines 57-63), and wherein the lid retains the ability to open and to close while the frame remains in place. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over McCoy et al. (US#5956825) in view of Bovard et al. (US#2005/0268440). Regarding claim 3, although McCoy discloses the frame is decorative in appearance (col. 8, lines 17-31), McCoy fails to disclose a decorative cover on the frame. However, as evidenced by Bovard, such a configuration is known in the analogous art, see casket 10 wherein the frame 34a,36a thereof (upper edges of the casket defining a flange) includes a removable decorative cover 32 thereon (Figs 1-5). Therefore, as evidenced by Bovard, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify McCoy to include a removable decorative cover on the frame. The rational for supporting this conclusion of obviousness is the proposed combination is based upon combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results. Moreover, all the claimed elements are known in the prior art and one skilled in the art could combine the elements as claimed by known methods with no change in their respective functions, and the combination yield nothing more than predictable results to one of ordinary skill in the art (MPEP 2143 and KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 415-421, 82 USPQ2d 1385, 1395-97 (2007)). The inclusion of the removable decorative cover on the frame would enhance the aesthetic appeal of the container and allow for customization thereof. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 and 4 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 2, McCoy fails to disclose or suggest wherein the frame includes at least one cutout region that corresponds to the at least one hinge of the lid, to accommodate the opening and closing of the lid with the frame in place. McCoy teaches away from any such modification via its required T-shape (Fig. 4A). Regarding claim 4, McCoy fails to disclose or suggest wherein the frame, in cross-section, has an inverted U-shape. McCoy teaches away from any such modification via its required T-shape (Fig. 4A). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892. It is noted Hobstetter (US#2012/0084952) discloses a funeral service container 100 comprising: an outer skirt 108; and inner box 102; a lid 106’; and a frame 104 having an inverted U-shape (Fig. 5). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WILLIAM L MILLER whose telephone number is (571)272-7068. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30 - 6:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at (571) 272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. WILLIAM L. MILLER Primary Examiner Art Unit 3677 /WILLIAM L MILLER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 22, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680333
Apparatus and Methods for Providing Highly Portable and Easily Erectable Fencing
1y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672707
PORTABLE SUITCASES
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668086
CONVERTIBLE HANDLE
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12669006
SIMPLIFIED MULTI-FUNCTION HINGE
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663203
A COOLING DEVICE HAVING A HANDLE GROOVE
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+14.7%)
2y 0m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1749 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month