Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 19/216,476

FASTENING TOOL AND FASTENING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 22, 2025
Priority
Nov 30, 2022 — continuation of PCTJP2022044254
Examiner
IJAZ, MUHAMMAD
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Takashima & Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
771 granted / 1039 resolved
+14.2% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
1066
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
39.1%
-0.9% vs TC avg
§102
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
§112
32.4%
-7.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1039 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Application Status Claims 1-15 are pending and have been examined in this application. This communication is the first action on the merits. Claims 1-15 are rejected herein. Information Disclosure Statement As of the date of this action, information disclosure statements (IDS) have been filed on 05/22/2025, 08/25/2025 and on 01/05/2026 and reviewed by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. The recitations of claims 1 and 7 wherein “…a plate-shaped photovoltaic module…” renders the claim indefinite because the shape of a plate vary greatly, Thus, one would not know at which shape the infringement would occur. Claims 1 and 7 are further indefinite because the recitation wherein “…the support member being arranged on the mounting target object;…a pressing member including a base portion fastened to the mounting target object by a fastening member….” is creating ambiguity as to whether the Applicant intends to positively claim the mounting target object or whether the mounting target object is functionally recited. For purposes of examination, the Examiner has interpreted the mounting target object as being a positively required structure of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is further indefinite because it is unclear what scope the recitation “…regulating movement of the photovoltaic module…” intends to entail. Dependent claims 2-6 and 8-16 are rejected based on their respective dependencies. Appropriate correction/explanation is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-16 as best understood would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See attached PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUHAMMAD IJAZ whose telephone number is (571)272-6280. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 11:00 am-10:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Liu can be reached at 5712728227. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MUHAMMAD IJAZ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3631 /Muhammad Ijaz/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3631
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 22, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704148
PIVOT CHANNEL NUT DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12687252
CORROSION RESISTANT TUBE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12680321
FRAMEWORK SUPPORT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669198
FASTENING ELEMENT OF A T-SHAPED PROFILE HOSE, CONNECTION ARRANGEMENT WITH THE FASTENING ELEMENT, SETTING DEVICE AS WELL AS MANUFACTURING AND CONNECTION METHOD
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663113
COMPACT STAND
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.6%)
2y 0m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1039 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month