Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/217,567

MULTI-OPERATOR CORE SASE FOR 5G SASE

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
May 23, 2025
Priority
Apr 15, 2024 — provisional 63/634,210 +4 more
Examiner
SALL, EL HADJI MALICK
Art Unit
2457
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Palo Alto Networks Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
843 granted / 925 resolved
+33.1% vs TC avg
Minimal -8% lift
Without
With
+-8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
935
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.8%
+2.8% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 925 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This action is in response to the application filed on May 23, 2025. Claims 1-21 are pending. Claims 1-21 represent MULTI-OPERATOR CORE SASE FOR 5G SASE. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. 19/217,567 12,695,792 12,676,896 1. A system, comprising: a processor configured to: receive mobile network traffic, at a Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) cloud network, via a service provider interconnect between a plurality of mobile service provider networks and the SASE cloud network; monitor the mobile network traffic at the SASE cloud network from the plurality of mobile service provider networks for a tenant of a SASE cloud network provider; enforce a security policy based on one or more parameters associated with the mobile network traffic, wherein the security policy is associated with the tenant of the SASE cloud network provider; and forward secured data plane traffic from the SASE cloud network to its original destination if allowed by the security policy, and block or drop the secured data plane traffic from the SASE cloud network if not allowed by the security policy; and a memory coupled to the processor and configured to provide the processor with instructions. 1. A system, comprising: a processor configured to: receive traffic associated with a User Equipment (UE) from a mobile core network at a Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) cloud network; enforce a security policy on data plane traffic associated with the UE based on contextual information associated with the UE to provide secured data plane traffic; and forward the secured data plane traffic from the SASE cloud network to its original destination; and a memory coupled to the processor and configured to provide the processor with instructions. 1. A system, comprising: a processor configured to: receive traffic associated with a User Equipment (UE) from a mobile core network at a Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) cloud network; extract contextual information associated with the traffic to determine a security policy to apply to the traffic; and enforce the security policy on data plane traffic associated with the UE based on the contextual information associated with the UE to provide secured data plane traffic; and a memory coupled to the processor and configured to provide the processor with instructions. 12,676,896 1. A system, comprising: a processor configured to: receive traffic associated with a User Equipment (UE) from a mobile core network at a Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) cloud network; extract contextual information from the traffic, wherein: the contextual information includes the following: subscriber-ID, Network Slice ID, equipment-ID, and other information; the subscriber-ID includes one or more of the following: International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI) and/or Subscription Permanent Identifier (SUPI); the equipment-ID includes one or more of the following: International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI) and/or Permanent Equipment Identifier (PEI); the Network Slice ID includes the following: Single Network Slice Selection Assistance Information (S-NSSAI); and the other information includes one or more of the following: User Equipment (UE) IP, Access Point Name (APN), Data Network Name (DNN), and/or Radio Access Technology (RAT) Type information; enforce a security policy on data plane traffic associated with the UE based on the contextual information associated with the UE to provide secured data plane traffic; forward the secured data plane traffic from the SASE cloud network to the mobile core network, wherein the secured data plane traffic egresses the mobile core network for its original destination; and a memory coupled to the processor and configured to provide the processor with instructions.. 2. Claims 1-21 of the instant application are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20, 1-18 and 1-23 of U.S. Patent No(s). 12,695,791; 12,676,896 and 12,676,896, respectively, issued to Ranade. Although the conflicting set of claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because a comparison between the set of claims shows that the instant claims 1-20 are anticipated by claims 1-20, 1-18 and 1-23 of ‘791, ‘896 and ‘596, respectively. This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection because the patentably indistinct claims have not in fact been patented. Conclusion 3. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EL HADJI SALL whose telephone number is (571)272-4010. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00-8:30 (flexible). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ario Etienne can be reached at 5712724001. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EL HADJI M SALL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2457
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750422
ALLOCATION OF SERVER RESOURCES IN REMOTE-ACCESS COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748878
ENCRYPTED INFORMATION RETRIEVAL
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743490
OPERATING SYSTEM-LEVEL ASSISTIVE FEATURES FOR CONTEXTUAL PRIVACY
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744806
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING CYBERSECURITY BY GENERATING ACTIVITY REPORTS USING MACHINE-LEARNING MODELS
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743467
DATA PROCESSING METHOD, DATA PROCESSING DEVICE, DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (-8.3%)
2y 7m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 925 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month