Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/217,590

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 23, 2025
Examiner
CRAWLEY, KEITH L
Art Unit
2626
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Alps Alpine Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allow Rate
340 granted / 577 resolved
-3.1% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
604
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
53.6%
+13.6% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 577 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. If Applicant fails to provide a sufficiently descriptive title, Examiner will do so upon allowance of the claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Liu et al. (US 2021/0223648). Regarding claim 1, Liu discloses a display device comprising: a first display unit having a plurality of openings, the first display unit being configured to switch between black and a predetermined pattern in response to application of a voltage (abstract, figs. 1-5, ¶ 36-43, display with light emitting portions P1 and openings P2, first and second display modes disclosed wherein P1 displays an image and P2 is off or P2 displays an image and P1 is off); a second display unit disposed adjacent to a rear side of the first display unit at a position where display contents are visible through the plurality of openings (figs. 1-5, ¶ 36-43, display with light emitting portions P2); and a switching unit configured to switch the first display unit to black display when the second display unit is turned on, and to switch the first display unit to a display state of the pattern when the second display unit is turned off (figs. 1-5, ¶ 36-43, display with light emitting portions P1 and openings P2, first and second display modes disclosed wherein P1 displays an image and P2 is off or P2 displays an image and P1 is off; see also fig. 11, ¶ 51). Regarding claim 2, Liu discloses wherein the first display unit is an electronic paper configured to maintain the display state of the pattern when the application of the voltage is stopped (figs. 1-5, ¶ 36-43, electronic ink microcapsules disclosed; see also ¶ 62). Regarding claim 4, Liu discloses wherein the first display device is disposed so as to overlap a black matrix of the second display unit (figs. 1-5, ¶ 36-43, black matrix BM). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liu in view of Wu et al. (US 2024/0176204). Regarding claim 3, Liu fails to disclose wherein the pattern is a woodgrain pattern. Wu teaches wherein the pattern is a woodgrain pattern (fig. 8, ¶ 71-74, electronic paper displays wood grain pattern to present a complete wood veneer appearance; see also figs. 30-31). Liu and Wu are both directed to stacked displays with electronic paper. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the device of Liu with the pattern of Wu since such a modification increases the harmony between the display and the surrounding decorative environment and improves the visual effect (Wu, ¶ 73). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: See attached Notice of References Cited. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEITH L CRAWLEY whose telephone number is (571)270-7616. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 10-6 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Temesghen Ghebretinsae can be reached at 571-272-3017. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KEITH L CRAWLEY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2626
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2025
Application Filed
Jan 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597388
DISPLAY DEVICE AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF USING AN UPDATE VOLTAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591341
DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING POSITION INPUT SYSTEM WITH PATTERN PROTECTION LAYER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592205
TUNING OF LOCAL DIMMING FUNCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12567365
DISPLAY APPARATUS, AND ADJUSTMENT METHOD AND FORMATION METHOD THEREOF USING BRIGHTNESS CHANGE RATE TO DETERMINE A POWER VOLTAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12547279
ILLUMINATED TOUCHPAD HAVING PARALLAX BARRIER LIGHT SOURCE MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+26.4%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 577 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month