Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/217,653

ELECTRONIC DEVICE WHICH TRANSMITS MEDIA CONTENT, AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 23, 2025
Priority
Nov 25, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0160328 +2 more
Examiner
RIAZ, SAHAR AQIL
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
372 granted / 497 resolved
+14.8% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
508
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
§103
55.6%
+15.6% vs TC avg
§102
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 497 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 5/23/2025 and 1/15/2026 is being considered by the examiner. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7-10 and 17-18 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6, 11-16, and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kafle et al. US Patent Publication No. 2015/0172757 in view of Sheynman et al. US Patent Publication No. 2004/0128324. Regarding Claim 1, Kafle discloses an electronic device comprising: a communication circuit; memory, comprising one or more storage media, storing instructions; and at least one processor communicatively coupled to the communication circuit and the memory, wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, individually or collectively, cause the electronic device to [Figure 2 & [0040-0043]]: transmit, via the communication circuit, capability information of the electronic device and a request for transmitting capability information of an external electronic device to the external electronic device [Figure 6A], obtain, via the communication circuit, the capability information of the external electronic device from the external electronic device [[0064]; At step 665, the source 600 may exchange a capability information between itself and the sink or sinks 610 selected during the discovery phase. Such capability information may include, among other things, a multimedia codec, a multimedia format, a minimum latency or buffer capability, or supported multicast mechanisms (e.g., DMS or GCR). The source 600 may use RTSP OPTIONS followed by GET_PARAMETER commands by including the group session management information to exchange and set the capability information], based on the obtained capability information of the external electronic device, generate the source 600 may determine the optimal parameters for the group session based on the capability information exchange between the sink or sinks selected in the above steps. The source 600 may additionally generate a session ID for the group session], and transmit, via the communication circuit, the generated source transmits the content to the sink]. Kafle fails to clearly disclose generating preview content and transmitting it to the external electronic device. In an analogous art, Sheynman discloses generating preview content to be output from the external electronic device [Figure 1 & [0020]] and transmit, via the communication circuit, the generating preview content to the external electronic device [Figure 1 & [0028]]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teachings of Kafle and Sheynman, before the effective filing date of the invention in order to provide content rights protection [Sheynman 0017]. Regarding Claim 11, Kafle disclose a method performed by an electronic device, the method comprising: transmitting, via a communication circuit of the electronic device, capability information of the electronic device and a request for transmitting capability information of an external electronic device to the external electronic device [Figure 6A]; obtaining, via the communication circuit, the capability information of the external electronic device from the external electronic device [[0064]; At step 665, the source 600 may exchange a capability information between itself and the sink or sinks 610 selected during the discovery phase. Such capability information may include, among other things, a multimedia codec, a multimedia format, a minimum latency or buffer capability, or supported multicast mechanisms (e.g., DMS or GCR). The source 600 may use RTSP OPTIONS followed by GET_PARAMETER commands by including the group session management information to exchange and set the capability information]; based on the obtained capability information of the external electronic device, generating the source 600 may determine the optimal parameters for the group session based on the capability information exchange between the sink or sinks selected in the above steps. The source 600 may additionally generate a session ID for the group session]; and transmitting, via the communication circuit, the generated preview content to the external electronic device [Figures 5, 6B [0057] & [0077]; source transmits the content to the sink]. Kafle fails to clearly disclose generating In an analogous art, Sheynman discloses generating preview content to be output from the external electronic device [Figure 1 & [0020]] and transmit, via the communication circuit, the generating preview content to the external electronic device [Figure 1 & [0028]]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teachings of Kafle and Sheynman, before the effective filing date of the invention in order to provide content rights protection [Sheynman 0017]. Regarding Claim 19, Kafle discloses one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media storing one or more computer programs including computer-executable instructions that, when executed by one or more processors of an electronic device individually or collectively, cause the electronic device to perform operations, the operations comprising [0190]: transmitting, via a communication circuit of the electronic device, capability information of the electronic device and a request for transmitting capability information of an external electronic device to the external electronic device [Figure 6A]; obtaining, via the communication circuit, the capability information of the external electronic device from the external electronic device [[0064]; At step 665, the source 600 may exchange a capability information between itself and the sink or sinks 610 selected during the discovery phase. Such capability information may include, among other things, a multimedia codec, a multimedia format, a minimum latency or buffer capability, or supported multicast mechanisms (e.g., DMS or GCR). The source 600 may use RTSP OPTIONS followed by GET_PARAMETER commands by including the group session management information to exchange and set the capability information]; based on the obtained capability information of the external electronic device, generating the source 600 may determine the optimal parameters for the group session based on the capability information exchange between the sink or sinks selected in the above steps. The source 600 may additionally generate a session ID for the group session]; and transmitting, via the communication circuit, the generated preview content to the external electronic device [Figures 5, 6B [0057] & [0077]; source transmits the content to the sink]. Kafle fails to clearly disclose generating In an analogous art, Sheynman discloses generating preview content to be output from the external electronic device [Figure 1 & [0020]] and transmit, via the communication circuit, the generating preview content to the external electronic device [Figure 1 & [0028]]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teachings of Kafle and Sheynman, before the effective filing date of the invention in order to provide content rights protection [Sheynman 0017]. Regarding Claims 2, 12 and 20, the combination of Kafle and Sheynman discloses an electronic device, wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, further cause the electronic device to: search for an external electronic device for transmission of media content from the electronic device, and identify whether the generated preview content exists for the media content [Kafle [0057] & [0060] & Sheynman [0031]]. Regarding Claims 3 and 13, the combination of Kafle and Sheynman discloses an electronic device wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, further cause the electronic device to, in case that the generated preview content exists for the media content, process the generated preview content based on the capability information of the external electronic device [Kafle [0057] & [0060] & Sheynman [0031]]. Regarding Claims 4 and 14, the combination of Kafle and Sheynman discloses an electronic device wherein the capability information received from the external electronic device comprises information related to at least one of a codec, frames per second (FPS), resolution, chipset, storage capacity, and network communication, of the external electronic device [Kafle 0064]. Regarding Claims 5 and 15, the combination of Kafle and Sheynman discloses an electronic device wherein the capability information received from the external electronic device comprises information related to quality of the preview content that the external electronic device is capable of receiving [Kafle [0065]]. Regarding Claims 6 and 16, the combination of Kafle and Sheynman discloses an electronic device wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor individually or collectively, further cause the electronic device to, based on the obtained capability information of the external electronic device, adjust an amount of the preview content to be transmitted to the external electronic device [Kafle [0057] & Sheynman [0024]]. Relevant Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Uhm et al. US Patent Publication No. 2023/0169723 - An electronic device includes a camera, a communication circuit, and at least one processor configured to receive, via the communication circuit, information related to content reproduced by an external display device, obtain, by the camera, a first image including the external display device, based on the external display device being identified to be outside of an identifiable range of the camera, generate a virtual object corresponding to the external display device, obtain the content reproduced by the external display device, based on the information related to the content reproduced by the external display device, and reproduce the obtained content within an area of the virtual object. Jung et al. US Patent Publication No. 2023/0389097 - An electronic device and a method of operating an electronic device are provided. The device includes a communication circuit and a processor operatively connected to the communication circuit. The processor is configured to receive, in a connected state with an access point (AP), information on an external electronic device related to a first communication scheme for data transmission and/or reception between the external electronic device connected to the AP and the electronic device and information on the external electronic device related to a second communication scheme different from the first communication scheme, set up a first session supported by the first communication scheme with the external electronic device, based on the information on the external electronic device related to the first communication scheme, discover the external electronic device, based on the information on the external electronic device related to the second communication scheme according to the electronic device satisfying a predetermined condition, set up a second session, based on data related to the second communication scheme, and transmit and/or receive the data through the second session. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAHAR A RIAZ whose telephone number is (571)270-3005. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9 am to 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Bruckart can be reached at 571-272-3982. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAHAR AQIL RIAZ/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2424
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707132
INTERACTIVE LIVE MEDIA SYSTEMS AND METHODS
4y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701281
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING VIDEO SUGGESTIONS
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695961
METHOD, APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE OF PAGE DISPLAY FOR APPLICATION
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689804
INTERACTION METHOD AND DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12671864
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING ACCESS TO MEDIA ASSETS USING TWO-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+15.9%)
3y 1m (~1y 11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 497 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month