Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 19/218,537

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FACILITIES ACCESS BREACH DETECTION AND INFORMATION PROTECTION

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
May 26, 2025
Priority
Feb 28, 2021 — provisional 63/205,652 +1 more
Examiner
HENNING, MATTHEW T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Security Enhancement Systems LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
421 granted / 590 resolved
+11.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
607
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
§103
46.3%
+6.3% vs TC avg
§102
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
§112
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 590 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This office action is in response to the communication filed on 5/26/2025. Claims 1-20 have been examined. Information Disclosure Statement No IDS has been filed in this application. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention, so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-20 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,314,407. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Conclusion Claims 1-20 have been rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW T HENNING whose telephone number is (571)272-3790. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-3PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Korzuch can be reached at (571)272-7589. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW T HENNING/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2491
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 26, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12650930
Track Activities of Endpoints having Secure Memory Devices for Security Operations during Identity Validation
4y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12645817
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR REDACTING AND RETRIEVING DATA IN A VIDEO
4y 4m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12645609
STORAGE DEVICE DELETING ENCRYPTION KEY, METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME, AND METHOD OF OPERATING ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12639478
STORAGE DEVICE HAVING AN RPMB RESET FUNCTION AND RPMB MANAGEMENT METHOD THEREOF
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12639479
STORAGE DEVICE AND COMPUTING DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+18.1%)
3y 5m (~2y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 590 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month