Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 19/219,028

APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING SHEETS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 27, 2025
Priority
May 27, 2024 — JP 2024-085904 +1 more
Examiner
JALLOW, EYAMINDAE CHOSSAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Duplo Seiko Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
571 granted / 728 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
741
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
60.5%
+20.5% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 728 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement 2. The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on May 27th 2025 and April 30th 2026 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 3. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 4. Claims 2-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 recites the limitation “the user” in line 7. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter 5. Claim 1 is allowed. Regarding claim 1, the most relevant prior art is Hidenori et al. (JP 2023-115754 A; “Hidenori”; refer to attached translation). Hidenori discloses an apparatus (1) for processing sheets (S) comprising: a conveyor (2, 27, 28) that conveys a sheet (S) on which a plurality of fold lines (C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, Cf, Cw) are set (Fig. 5; pg. 3 para. 1); a folder (7) that folds the sheet (S) conveyed by the conveyor (2, 27, 28) along the fold lines (pg. 2 para. 1); an applicator (31) that applies an adhesive to the sheet (S; pg. 7 para. 4); and a controller (9) configured to control the conveyor (2, 27, 28; pg. 6 para. 5), the folder (7; pg. 2 para. 10), and the applicator (31; pg. 5 para. 13), wherein the controller (9) includes: an acquirer configured to acquire processing information of the sheet (S; pg. 5 para. 13). Hidenori fails to disclose a fold line determinator configured to determine, based on the processing information acquired by the acquirer, which one of the plurality of fold lines along which the sheet is to be folded by the folder; and a folding controller configured to control the folder to fold the sheet in accordance with determination of the fold line determinator. It would not have been obvious to modify Hidenori with the aforementioned limitation because the addition of the folding controller would provide a redundant function for the CPU of Hidenori. 6. Claims 2-12 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion 7. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EYAMINDAE JALLOW whose telephone number is (571)270-1927. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday from 7:30am-5:00pm and alternating Fridays from 7:30am-4:00pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, SHELLEY SELF, can be reached on (571)272-4524. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571)273-8300. 8. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /EYAMINDAE C JALLOW/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 27, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12735280
HANDLING OF FOOD PRODUCTS
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728492
DEVICE FOR MECHANICAL OVERLOAD PROTECTION AND PRODUCTION PROCESS FOR SAME
1y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12721624
SURGICAL STAPLER WITH FIRING LOCKOUT FEATURE COUPLED TO END EFFECTOR RETAINER
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12714125
A STICK HANDLING APPARATUS, AN ICE CREAM PRODUCTION SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR PRODUCING ICE CREAM
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12715640
HEAT SHRINK PACKAGING SYSTEM
1y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+20.1%)
2y 10m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 728 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month