Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 19/219,643

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING VIDEO SIGNAL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 27, 2025
Priority
Jun 08, 2018 — RE 10-2018-0065897 +4 more
Examiner
HOLDER, ANNER N
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
KT Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
594 granted / 754 resolved
+18.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
775
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
§103
53.9%
+13.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
§112
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 754 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 07/13/26 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 14-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zheng et al. US 2013/0114717 in view of Yamamoto et al. US 2015/0312588. As to claim 14, Zheng teaches a method of decoding a video, the method comprising: deriving a plurality of merge candidates for a current block; [figs. 5-7; ¶ 0076; ¶ 0138-0139; ¶ 0154-0162] constructing a merge candidate list by adding the plurality of merge candidates thereto, wherein during the construction of the merge candidate list, a new merge candidate generated based on two of the plurality of merge candidates is further added to the merge candidate list; [¶ 0155-0162; ¶ 0174-0176] selecting a first merge candidate and a second merge candidate from the merge candidate list; [¶ 0155-0162] and obtaining prediction samples of the current block based on first motion information derived from the first merge candidate and second motion information derived from the second merge candidate, [¶ 0175-0176] wherein: first index information, specifying the first merge candidate, is explicitly signaled via a bitstream, [¶ 0028-0029; ¶ 0076; ¶ 0155-0162] Zheng does not explicitly teach a merge candidate that has a smallest index or has an index by adding an offset to an index of the first merge candidate is determined as the second merge candidate. Yamamoto teaches a merge candidate that has a smallest index or has an index by adding an offset to an index of the first merge candidate is determined as the second merge candidate. [¶ 0538; ¶ 0539] It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate the techniques of Yamamoto with the teachings of Zheng allowing for improved coding efficiency. As to claim 15, Zheng (modified by Yamamoto) teaches the limitations of claim 1. Zheng teaches wherein in response to the second merge candidate has both LO motion information and L1 motion information, the second motion information is inherited from either of the LO motion information and L1 motion information. [¶ 0175-0176] As to claim 16, Zheng teaches a method of encoding a video, the method comprising: deriving a plurality of merge candidates for a current block; [figs. 5-7; ¶ 0076; ¶ 0138-0139; ¶ 0154-0162] constructing a merge candidate list by adding the plurality of merge candidates thereto, wherein during the construction of the merge candidate list, a new merge candidate generated based on two of the plurality of merge candidates is further added to the merge candidate list; [¶ 0155-0162; ¶ 0174-0176] selecting a first merge candidate and a second merge candidate list from the merge candidate list; [¶ 0155-0162] and obtaining prediction samples of the current block based on first motion information derived from the first merge candidate and second motion information derived from the second merge candidate, [¶ 0175-0176] wherein: first index information, specifying the first merge candidate, is explicitly encoded into a bitstream, [¶ 0028-0029; ¶ 0076; ¶ 0155-0162] Zheng does not explicitly teach a merge candidate that has a smallest index or has an index by adding an offset to an index of the first merge candidate is determined as the second merge candidate. Yamamoto teaches a merge candidate that has a smallest index or has an index by adding an offset to an index of the first merge candidate is determined as the second merge candidate. [¶ 0538; ¶ 0539] It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate the techniques of Yamamoto with the teachings of Zheng allowing for improved coding efficiency. As to claim 17, Zheng (modified by Yamamoto) teaches the limitations of claim 16. Zheng teaches wherein in response to the second merge candidate has both LO motion information and L1 motion information, the second motion information is inherited from either of the LO motion information and L1 motion information. [¶ 0175-0176] As to claim 18, Zheng teaches a device of storing compressed video data, comprising: a processor to generate the compressed video data by encoding a video; [¶ 0046; fig. 1] and a memory to store the compressed video data, [fig. 1; ¶ 0036; ¶ 0045] wherein generating the compressed video data comprises: deriving a plurality of merge candidates for a current block; [figs. 5-7; ¶ 0076; ¶ 0138-0139; ¶ 0154-0162] constructing a merge candidate list by adding the plurality of merge candidates thereto, wherein during the construction of the merge candidate list, a new merge candidate generated based on two of the plurality of merge candidates is further added to the merge candidate list; [¶ 0155-0162; ¶ 0174-0176] selecting a first merge candidate and a second merge candidate list from the merge candidate list; [¶ 0155-0162] and obtaining prediction samples of the current block based on first motion information derived from the first merge candidate and second motion information derived from the second merge candidate, [¶ 0175-0176] wherein: first index information, specifying the first merge candidate, is explicitly encoded into a bitstream, [¶ 0028-0029; ¶ 0076; ¶ 0155-0162] Zheng does not explicitly teach a merge candidate that has a smallest index or has an index by adding an offset to an index of the first merge candidate is determined as the second merge candidate. Yamamoto teaches a merge candidate that has a smallest index or has an index by adding an offset to an index of the first merge candidate is determined as the second merge candidate. [¶ 0538; ¶ 0539] It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to incorporate the techniques of Yamamoto with the teachings of Zheng allowing for improved coding efficiency. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANNER HOLDER whose telephone number is (571)270-1549. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Ustaris can be reached at 571.272.7383. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANNER HOLDER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2483
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 27, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707079
IMAGE DECODING METHOD AND DEVICE ON BASIS OF AFFINE MOTION PREDICTION USING CONSTRUCTED AFFINE MVP CANDIDATE IN IMAGE CODING SYSTEM
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12705576
TRACKING INVENTORY ITEMS IN A STORE FOR RE-STOCKING OF INVENTORY ITEMS TO BE RE-STOCKED
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707073
STORING MISALIGNED REFERENCE PIXEL TILES
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701239
SELECTIVE TRANSFORM SET IN VIDEO CODING
1y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12694617
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED AERIAL MAPPING WITH AERIAL VEHICLES
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+13.5%)
3y 2m (~1y 11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 754 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month