Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 19/219,784

AUTHENTICATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF PHYSICAL OBJECTS USING MICROSTRUCTURAL FEATURES

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
May 27, 2025
Priority
Feb 08, 2023 — provisional 63/483,903 +17 more
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TAUQIR
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Veracity Protocol Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
696 granted / 825 resolved
+24.4% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
857
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
§103
55.5%
+15.5% vs TC avg
§102
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 825 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending for examination in the instant application. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1, 8 and 15 rejected on the ground of non-statutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 7 and 13 of U.S. Patent No. 12469316 B1. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because see the table below: Instant Application: 19246671 U.S. Patent No.: 12469316 B1 1. A method for authentication of a physical object based on microstructural features extracted from patches of a surface of the physical object, the method comprising: processing a plurality of input surfaces of an object by a feature extractor using a deep neural network, wherein the plurality of input surfaces varies in dimensions, and the plurality of input surfaces are processed by the deep neural network from a plurality of images of the object captured by a device camera; outputting by the feature extractor, an input surface from the plurality of input surfaces which is uniformly sized with respect to sizes of the plurality of input surfaces; dividing the input surface of the object into a plurality of micro-surfaces; training the feature extractor on the plurality of micro-surfaces to identify a plurality of microstructural features of the input surface of the object; applying the trained feature extractor on a plurality of surfaces corresponding to a plurality of objects, the plurality of surfaces have different dimensions from the plurality of input surfaces; storing a set of microstructural features of the plurality of surfaces corresponding to the plurality of objects in a database; and using the trained feature extractor for authenticating a plurality of query objects based on the plurality of microstructural features of the input surface corresponding to each query object, wherein the authentication includes matching the plurality of microstructural features obtained from images of a query object with the set of microstructural features of the plurality of objects stored in the database. 1. A method for authentication of a physical object based on microstructural features extracted from patches of a surface of the physical object, the method comprising: processing a plurality of input surfaces of an object by a feature extractor using a deep neural network, wherein the plurality of input surfaces varies in dimensions, and the plurality of input surfaces are processed by the deep neural network from a plurality of images of the object captured by a device camera; outputting by the feature extractor, an input surface from the plurality of input surfaces which is uniformly sized with respect to sizes of the plurality of input surfaces wherein the feature extractor describes the input surface as a one-dimensional feature vector; dividing the input surface of the object into a plurality of micro-surfaces; training the feature extractor on the plurality of micro-surfaces to identify a plurality of microstructural features of the input surface of the object; applying the trained feature extractor on a plurality of surfaces corresponding to a plurality of objects, the plurality of surfaces have different dimensions from the plurality of input surfaces; storing a set of microstructural features of the plurality of surfaces corresponding to the plurality of objects in a database; and using the trained feature extractor for authenticating a plurality of query objects based on the plurality of microstructural features of the input surface corresponding to each query object, wherein the authentication includes matching the plurality of microstructural features obtained from images of a query object with the set of microstructural features of the plurality of objects stored in the database. 8. A system for authentication of a physical object based on microstructural features extracted from patches of a surface of the physical object, the system comprises: a backend module including machine learning (ML) models configured to process a plurality of input surfaces of an object by a feature extractor of the ML models using a deep neural network, wherein the plurality of input surfaces varies in dimensions, and the plurality of input surfaces are processed by the deep neural network from a plurality of images of the object captured by a device camera, and the backend module is configured to: receive by the feature extractor, an input surface from the plurality of input surfaces which is uniformly sized with respect to sizes of the plurality of input surfaces; divide the input surface of the object into a plurality of micro-surfaces; train the feature extractor on the plurality of micro-surfaces to identify a plurality of microstructural features of the input surface of the object; apply the trained feature extractor on a plurality of surfaces corresponding to a plurality of objects, the plurality of surfaces have different dimensions from the plurality of input surfaces; store a set of microstructural features of the plurality of surfaces corresponding to the plurality of objects in a database; and use the trained feature extractor for authenticating a plurality of query objects based on the plurality of microstructural features of the input surface corresponding to each query object, wherein the authentication includes matching the plurality of microstructural features obtained from images of a query object with the set of microstructural features of the plurality of objects stored in the database. 7. A system for authentication of a physical object based on microstructural features extracted from patches of a surface of the physical object, the system comprises: a backend module including machine learning (ML) models configured to process a plurality of input surfaces of an object by a feature extractor of the ML models using a deep neural network, wherein the plurality of input surfaces varies in dimensions, and the plurality of input surfaces are processed by the deep neural network from a plurality of images of the object captured by a device camera, and the backend module is configured to: receive by the feature extractor, an input surface from the plurality of input surfaces which is uniformly sized with respect to sizes of the plurality of input surfaces wherein the feature extractor describes the input surface as a one-dimensional feature vector; divide the input surface of the object into a plurality of micro-surfaces; train the feature extractor on the plurality of micro-surfaces to identify a plurality of microstructural features of the input surface of the object; apply the trained feature extractor on a plurality of surfaces corresponding to a plurality of objects, the plurality of surfaces have different dimensions from the plurality of input surfaces; store a set of microstructural features of the plurality of surfaces corresponding to the plurality of objects in a database; and use the trained feature extractor for authenticating a plurality of query objects based on the plurality of microstructural features of the input surface corresponding to each query object, wherein the authentication includes matching the plurality of microstructural features obtained from images of a query object with the set of microstructural features of the plurality of objects stored in the database. 15. A computer-program product tangibly embodied in a non-transitory machine- readable storage medium, including instructions configured to cause a data processing apparatus to perform operations, for authenticating a physical object based on microstructural features extracted from patches of a surface of the physical object, the operations comprising: processing a plurality of input surfaces of an object by a feature extractor using a deep neural network, wherein the plurality of input surfaces varies in dimensions, and the plurality of input surfaces are processed by the deep neural network from a plurality of images of the object captured by a device camera; outputting by the feature extractor, an input surface from the plurality of input surfaces which is uniformly sized with respect to sizes of the plurality of input surfaces; dividing the input surface of the object into a plurality of micro-surfaces; training the feature extractor on the plurality of micro-surfaces to identify a plurality of microstructural features of the input surface of the object; applying the trained feature extractor on a plurality of surfaces corresponding to a plurality of objects, the plurality of surfaces have different dimensions from the plurality of input surfaces; storing a set of microstructural features of the plurality of surfaces corresponding to the plurality of objects in a database; and using the trained feature extractor for authenticating a plurality of query objects based on the plurality of microstructural features of the input surface corresponding to each query object, wherein the authentication includes matching the plurality of microstructural features obtained from images of a query object with the set of microstructural features of the plurality of objects stored in the database. 13. A computer-program product tangibly embodied in a non-transitory machine-readable storage medium, including instructions configured to cause a data processing apparatus to perform operations, for authenticating a physical object based on microstructural features extracted from patches of a surface of the physical object, the operations comprising: processing a plurality of input surfaces of an object by a feature extractor using a deep neural network, wherein the plurality of input surfaces varies in dimensions, and the plurality of input surfaces are processed by the deep neural network from a plurality of images of the object captured by a device camera; outputting by the feature extractor, an input surface from the plurality of input surfaces which is uniformly sized with respect to sizes of the plurality of input surfaces wherein the feature extractor describes the input surface as a one-dimensional feature vector; dividing the input surface of the object into a plurality of micro-surfaces; training the feature extractor on the plurality of micro-surfaces to identify a plurality of microstructural features of the input surface of the object; applying the trained feature extractor on a plurality of surfaces corresponding to a plurality of objects, the plurality of surfaces have different dimensions from the plurality of input surfaces; storing a set of microstructural features of the plurality of surfaces corresponding to the plurality of objects in a database; and using the trained feature extractor for authenticating a plurality of query objects based on the plurality of microstructural features of the input surface corresponding to each query object, wherein the authentication includes matching the plurality of microstructural features obtained from images of a query object with the set of microstructural features of the plurality of objects stored in the database. The difference being that the instant claims are broader than the conflicting claims and the conflicting claims contain the limitation e.g., the feature extractor describes the input as a one-dimensional feature vector. Hence the conflicting claims are a species of a genus of the instant claims. The instant claims merely broaden the scope of the conflicting claims. It is well settled that broadening the scope of claims would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of the narrower issued claims. In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982) and In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993). The dependent claims carry the deficiencies from the base claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Please see the attached PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TAUQIR HUSSAIN whose telephone number is (571)270-1247. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:00 - 8:00 with IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vivek Srivastava can be reached at 571 272-7304. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Tauqir Hussain/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2449
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 27, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 06, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12701105
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ANALYZING REAL-TIME DATA FROM HETEROGENEOUS COLLABORATION PLATFORMS TO IDENTIFY RISK
4y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12694085
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PERFORMING AUTHENTICATION BY USING BIOMETRIC DATA OF USER, AND METHOD THEREFOR
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12684034
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AGGREGATION OF CLOUD STORAGE
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684197
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CONTENT DELIVERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12670297
PRIVACY PROTECTION OF DIGITAL IMAGE DATA ON A SOCIAL NETWORK
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+26.1%)
3y 0m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 825 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month